reddogblitz Posted October 23, 2015 Posted October 23, 2015 I'll do what I always do. If I don't like either major party candidate then I'll vote for a 3rd party candidate. You can't complain about the 2 party system if you always vote for one of them.
Dorkington Posted October 23, 2015 Posted October 23, 2015 (edited) I'll do what I always do. If I don't like either major party candidate then I'll vote for a 3rd party candidate. You can't complain about the 2 party system if you always vote for one of them. Ideally, that's the way it should be. And it might be what I do this year. (or I might not vote at all, because it's feeling more and more useless) Edited October 23, 2015 by Dorkington
meazza Posted October 23, 2015 Posted October 23, 2015 (edited) Ideally, that's the way it should be. And it might be what I do this year. (or I might not vote at all, because it's feeling more and more useless) Move to Canada. There are some nice places to rent in Nunavut Edited October 23, 2015 by meazza
Canadian Bills Fan Posted October 23, 2015 Posted October 23, 2015 Move to Canada. There are some nice places to rent in Nunavut Even thats too "Canadian" for me CBF
meazza Posted October 23, 2015 Posted October 23, 2015 That's in the heart of summer right? lol probably.
B-Man Posted October 25, 2015 Posted October 25, 2015 Hillary Clinton Owns the War in Libya (And Its Horrible Aftermath) by David Harsanyi Original Article Bill Clinton makes his 2016 campaign debut in Iowa CBS News, by Hannah Fraser-Chanpong Original Article AMERICA’S TEST: IMAGINING A CLINTON VERSUS CARSON ELECTION. You may say Roger Simon is a dreamer, but he’s not the only one: If you close your eyes and see Carson and Clinton standing together on a stage, you are almost envisioning a confrontation between good and evil, the forces of light and darkness, with the black man being light, of course. I know that sounds Manichean, but there is no question that Carson is the kind of person the Founders had in mind to lead our country, the private citizen who had led a noble life come to serve the public, a soft-spoken American Cincinnatus from Johns Hopkins by way of the Detroit ghetto. Yes, they might have been surprised to find that he is black, but I suspect some of them would not have been that surprised. And, although you may not agree with everything Carson says, it’s clear his convictions come from the heart. They are not “political.” Hillary Clinton is the antithesis. Deep down, everyone knows it. Read the whole thing.
/dev/null Posted October 25, 2015 Posted October 25, 2015 On a lighter side, Monday is Hillary's birthday. So lets put all the partisan bickering aside for a moment and wish her a happy 50th anniversary of her 18th birthday.
4merper4mer Posted October 26, 2015 Posted October 26, 2015 (edited) Which means she'll be 69 next year. Poojer posted here last week. This seems like a question for him. Edited October 26, 2015 by 4merper4mer
B-Man Posted October 26, 2015 Posted October 26, 2015 (edited) Celebrate her birthday in style ! We're at the point in US history where one major political party (dems) defines a "great week" by getting away with lies and not being indicted. . Edited October 26, 2015 by B-Man
B-Man Posted October 27, 2015 Posted October 27, 2015 Clinton previews her lame ‘everything is sexism’ strategy. Conservatives knew this was coming. Just as President Obama and his surrogates found racism in every criticism or disagreement with the commander in chief, Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton is now finding sexism in everyday remarks. At the first Democratic presidential debate, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders said that “all the shouting in the world” would not solve gun violence. What Americans heard: “As a senator from a rural state, what I can tell Secretary Clinton, that all the shouting in the world is not going to do what I would hope all of us want, and that is keep guns out of the hands of people who should not have those guns and end this horrible violence that we are seeing.” What Hillary Clinton heard: SEXISM!!!!!!!1!!1!! {snip} Sanders, of course, disagreed with Clinton's characterization of his remarks, and said in a Sunday interview that "what the secretary is doing there is taking words and misapplying them." Prepare for another 12 months of this, if Clinton is indeed the Democratic nominee. Well, it’s not as if she can run on her record, you know.
keepthefaith Posted October 27, 2015 Posted October 27, 2015 (edited) Is there a Hillary supporter reading this that can help me understand why they think she is remotely qualified to be President let alone the Democrat nominee? It's fair to say that she isn't honest, has experience but no real accomplishments and is a far cry from the "common man" that Democrats say they represent. Is it that she plays for your team and is the best that your team can put forth or is it more about hatred for the other side (Republicans)? Does she even understand the big fiscal issues we face as a nation and does she have any solutions to solve those? Solutions that don't simply deploy the old tired greater taxing and spending tools? Does she know anything about growing an economy and does she have a plan for that? Can we excuse her poor record as SOS and believe that as a President she will do much better on foreign policy matters? Is she really going to go farther than Obama on helping illegal immigrants get citizenship while at the same time making it harder for Americans on the lower part of the economic scale get jobs? Please, somebody from the left, help me understand. Edited October 27, 2015 by keepthefaith
Doc Posted October 27, 2015 Posted October 27, 2015 Is there a Hillary supporter reading this that can help me understand why they think she is remotely qualified to be President let alone the Democrat nominee? It's fair to say that she isn't honest, has experience but no real accomplishments and is a far cry from the "common man" that Democrats say they represent. Is it that she plays for your team and is the best that your team can put forth or is it more about hatred for the other side (Republicans)? Does she even understand the big fiscal issues we face as a nation and does she have any solutions to solve those? Solutions that don't simply deploy the old tired greater taxing and spending tools? Does she know anything about growing an economy and does she have a plan for that? Can we excuse for poor record as SOS and believe that as a President she will do much better on foreign policy matters? Is she really going to go farther than Obama on helping illegal immigrants get citizenship while at the same time making it harder for Americans on the lower part of the economic scale get jobs? Please, somebody from the left, help me understand. Questions answered.
reddogblitz Posted October 27, 2015 Posted October 27, 2015 (edited) Is there a Hillary supporter reading this that can help me understand why they think she is remotely qualified to be President let alone the Democrat nominee? It's fair to say that she isn't honest, has experience but no real accomplishments and is a far cry from the "common man" that Democrats say they represent. Is it that she plays for your team and is the best that your team can put forth that you think can win or is it more about hatred for the other side (Republicans)? Does she even understand the big fiscal issues we face as a nation and does she have any solutions to solve those? Solutions that don't simply deploy the old tired greater taxing and spending tools? Does she know anything about growing an economy and does she have a plan for that? Can we excuse for poor record as SOS and believe that as a President she will do much better on foreign policy matters? Is she really going to go farther than Obama on helping illegal immigrants get citizenship while at the same time making it harder for Americans on the lower part of the economic scale get jobs? Please, somebody from the left, help me understand. Fixed and answered. One more to add. Hillary voted for the Iraq War. Why is this now acceptable? Edited October 27, 2015 by reddogblitz
DC Tom Posted October 27, 2015 Posted October 27, 2015 One more to add. Hillary voted for the Iraq War. Why is this now acceptable? "What have you done for me lately?" That, and the litmus test of a single vote - even one as important as OIF - is pretty stupid.
B-Man Posted October 30, 2015 Posted October 30, 2015 All too believable............................. Elliot Spitzer: I buried plan to give illegal immigrants licenses to help Hillary by Geoff Earle Original Article
reddogblitz Posted October 30, 2015 Posted October 30, 2015 (edited) All too believable............................. Elliot Spitzer: I buried plan to give illegal immigrants licenses to help Hillary by Geoff Earle If Spitzer did indeed scuttle a plan he thought was good for the Original Article If Ellliot did indeed scuttle a plan he thought would be beneficial to the residents of his state in order to help Hillary get elected, then he's even more of a scum bag than I thought. Edited October 30, 2015 by reddogblitz
keepthefaith Posted October 30, 2015 Posted October 30, 2015 If Ellliot did indeed scuttle a plan he thought would be beneficial to the residents of his state in order to help Hillary get elected, then he's even more of a scum bag than I thought. Except he made the right decision not to grant driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. Unfortunately he was right for the wrong reason.
Recommended Posts