B-Man Posted September 12, 2015 Share Posted September 12, 2015 (edited) Stunning: Justice Department lawyers argue Hillary Clinton had the right to delete any emails she chose: … http://dlvr.it/C7WxCG Using laugh-out-loud justification, Justice Department lawyers have asserted to a federal judge that Hillary Clinton should be trusted to decide what records she chooses to delete, with no outside review. Ruby Kramer of Buzzfeed is correct: a brief filed by Justice Department attorneys on Wednesday, was “little-noticed.” Yet it contains a shocking position for federal lawyers to assert to a court. Department of Justice lawyers outlined a comprehensive defense of the contentious decision by Hillary Clinton to wipe the private email server she used as secretary of state: The attorneys assert that, regardless of whether she used a personal or government account, Clinton was within her legal right to handpick the emails that qualified as federal records — and to delete the ones she deemed personal. {snip} Jazz Shaw of Hot Air had exactly the same reaction that first occurred to me: Say… I wonder if the IRS would be willing to allow me to go through all of my tax documents, decide which ones were “relevant” and just toss the rest in the old burn barrel? I mean, there’s no reason to think I wasn’t being honest and forthcoming, so pesky little details such as those should be left to my discretion. Even more to the point, if something of interest to the police takes place on my property and it’s captured by my security cameras, I suppose I can decide which footage is relevant and worthy of retention. But we are being silly by pretending that the same rules would apply to us as to Hillary Clinton. Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/09/stunning_justice_department_lawyers_argue_hillary_clinton_had_the_right_to_delete_any_emails_she_chose.html#ixzz3lYGGTHm3 Hey........that Nixon..............he can erase any 18 minutes that he wants....................amirite Obama Administration ? Did Terrorists Access Hillary’s Home Server? It is now generally taken as a given that Russian and Chinese spies were reading Hillary Clinton’s official email correspondence while she was Secretary of State. Breaking into an unsecured home server is child’s play for those countries’ intelligence agencies. But this story from Great Britain raises an even more chilling possibility: Jihadists in Syria have hacked into ministerial email accounts in a sophisticated espionage operation. More at the link.............. Edited September 12, 2015 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 Hillary's new look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/tech-company-no-indication-that-clintons-e-mail-server-was-wiped/2015/09/12/10c8ce52-58c6-11e5-abe9-27d53f250b11_story.html?tid=trending_strip_2 It depends what your definition of wiped is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 In any event, Hill'ry doesn't wipe, she has people for that. They are instructed to wipe from the front AND the back, but to never mention to Hill'ry which direction was the final direction. That being the case, she can always issue the "What difference does it make" comment as needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted September 13, 2015 Share Posted September 13, 2015 http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/tech-company-no-indication-that-clintons-e-mail-server-was-wiped/2015/09/12/10c8ce52-58c6-11e5-abe9-27d53f250b11_story.html?tid=trending_strip_2 It depends what your definition of wiped is... Lots of ways and points in time to remove data, but much of the public and the media will buy this story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 ...and the beat goes on. Hillary Clinton´s Google cache Poitico, by Josh Gerstein Original Article Classified emails passed through commercial email services like Google and AOL on their path to or from a private server maintained by Hillary Clinton when she was secretary of state, but so far, the government appears to have done little to retrieve or secure the messages.A POLITICO review of Clinton emails made public by the State Department shows that at least 55 messages now deemed to include classified information appear to have been sent to or from private accounts other than Clinton’s. That number is certain to grow substantially as State processes all Clinton emails More at link HILLARY CLINTON’S MALE VOTER PROBLEM. “Clinton is also getting swamped among Democratic men. She trails among them 48-29, while leading among women by a similar margin, 49-35.” Hell, she couldn’t even ensure Bill’s loyalty. How low can she sink ?............................this low........am I right ? MSNBC Panel: Hillary Should be More Authentic Like… Sarah Palin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 14, 2015 Share Posted September 14, 2015 Hillary Clinton upped the shameless factor again today with tweets about sexual assault. Lack of self-awareness, anyone? Hillary Clinton ✔ @HillaryClinton "To every survivor of sexual assault...You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed. We're with you." —Hillary Legal Insurrection @LegInsurrection .@HillaryClinton did they have right to be believed? pic.twitter.com/ju7kmRmkXA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 And then there is this: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/20/exclusive-hillary-clinton-took-me-through-hell-rape-victim-says.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 And then there is this: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/20/exclusive-hillary-clinton-took-me-through-hell-rape-victim-says.html There's only one thing slimmer than a defense attorney and that's a defense attorney that gets into politics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 There's only one thing slimmer than a defense attorney and that's a defense attorney that gets into politics... ...while on a diet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 ...while on a diet. Dammitt!! Ok no more posting on the bike at the gym Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 A Pro-Clinton Super PAC Is Going Negative On Bernie Sanders : http://huff.to/1M83IyQ I'm stunned -- like you are -- David Brock isn't taking the high road. His attack on Sanders is so so unlike him................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 Sanders has no chance running as an "Independent Socialist" anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 (edited) WHEN YOU’VE LOST ANDREA MITCHELL: White Women ‘Abandoning’ Hillary Clinton ‘in Droves,’ Mitchell Reports: During Tuesday’s edition of NBC’s Today morning program, news anchor Andrea Mitchell addressed a trend that probably has former secretary of state Hillary Clinton and her campaign staff feeling “trumped:” White women are “abandoning” the Democratic front-runner in the 2016 presidential campaign “in droves.” The host of Andrea Mitchell Reports – which airs at 12 noon weekdays on the MSNBC cable channel — started her report by stating: “Hillary Clinton is reaching out to that group that she’d always counted on: white women voters who are now abandoning her in droves during the last two months. “ Gee, I can’t imagine why women would be turned off by the Clintons. Edited September 16, 2015 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 WHEN YOU’VE LOST ANDREA MITCHELL: White Women ‘Abandoning’ Hillary Clinton ‘in Droves,’ Mitchell Reports: During Tuesday’s edition of NBC’s Today morning program, news anchor Andrea Mitchell addressed a trend that probably has former secretary of state Hillary Clinton and her campaign staff feeling “trumped:” White women are “abandoning” the Democratic front-runner in the 2016 presidential campaign “in droves.” The host of Andrea Mitchell Reports – which airs at 12 noon weekdays on the MSNBC cable channel — started her report by stating: “Hillary Clinton is reaching out to that group that she’d always counted on: white women voters who are now abandoning her in droves during the last two months. “ Gee, I can’t imagine why women would be turned off by the Clintons. The latest SoProg argument to get women to vote for them is the campus rape thing. Campus rapes were something colleges always raised awareness when I was in college in the early 80s, and everyone worked together to ensure women were escorted back to their dorms safely. The rape concerns were not the students, but people coming onto the campus to stalk out girls coming home drunk at night. But in California, campus rape now includes the woman who had a couple of drinks, jumped in bed with a guy, woke up the next morning, realized she made a mistake, and has the guy charged with rape. If you don't have a notarized statement of consent before you touch a girl in college, you're phucked. I'm not saying any of this is right or wrong. I'm just saying I'm glad I'm not a college freshman these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 The latest SoProg argument to get women to vote for them is the campus rape thing. Campus rapes were something colleges always raised awareness when I was in college in the early 80s, and everyone worked together to ensure women were escorted back to their dorms safely. The rape concerns were not the students, but people coming onto the campus to stalk out girls coming home drunk at night. But in California, campus rape now includes the woman who had a couple of drinks, jumped in bed with a guy, woke up the next morning, realized she made a mistake, and has the guy charged with rape. If you don't have a notarized statement of consent before you touch a girl in college, you're phucked. I'm not saying any of this is right or wrong. I'm just saying I'm glad I'm not a college freshman these days. Really? California freshmen have it easy. At Brown, a guy has to get an affirmative statement of consent for each step in the hookup. Failure to do so constituted rape. And, of course, doing so was no guarantee against a rape charge, since any affirmative statement could be nullified by suspicion of impairment or coercion. But if a woman tries to pick you up, and you say no, you've hurt her feelings...and that's harrassment. Had that one actually happen to me in college. So glad I'm ostensibly an adult now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 Really? California freshmen have it easy. At Brown, a guy has to get an affirmative statement of consent for each step in the hookup. Failure to do so constituted rape. And, of course, doing so was no guarantee against a rape charge, since any affirmative statement could be nullified by suspicion of impairment or coercion. But if a woman tries to pick you up, and you say no, you've hurt her feelings...and that's harrassment. Had that one actually happen to me in college. So glad I'm ostensibly an adult now. And I'll add, for me anyway, very happily married adult to your last sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 Really? California freshmen have it easy. At Brown, a guy has to get an affirmative statement of consent for each step in the hookup. Failure to do so constituted rape. And, of course, doing so was no guarantee against a rape charge, since any affirmative statement could be nullified by suspicion of impairment or coercion. But if a woman tries to pick you up, and you say no, you've hurt her feelings...and that's harrassment. Had that one actually happen to me in college. So glad I'm ostensibly an adult now. No girl who goes to Brown is worth that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 No girl who goes to Brown is worth that. No girl/woman is worth that period! That's why god invented masturbation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaryPinC Posted September 16, 2015 Share Posted September 16, 2015 No girl/woman is worth that period! That's why god invented masturbation. God didn't invent it, but after creating man, he certainly knew it was cumming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts