Keukasmallies Posted August 20, 2015 Posted August 20, 2015 So to recap: U.S. Secretary of State received classified intelligence stored on an unsecured server located in a bathroom closet of a walk-up apartment. "I know Nothing ! " What an excellent comment and comparison: Both play at the part, both demonstrate little or no clue about the situation around them, neither was more than a bit player. In Hill'ry's case, "I know nothing" is both literal and figurative when applied to the entire range of questions confronting her.
B-Man Posted August 20, 2015 Posted August 20, 2015 Hillary's Qualifications How did it happen that, in this the land of Washington, Jefferson, Madison et al, someone so fundamentally dishonest and so unbelievably incompetent should not only aspire to be its president, but should actually be taken seriously in this aspiration by one of the country’s two major parties? I cannot recall any presidential contender from either party over the past 60 years as fundamentally undeserving of such a distinction as Hillary Clinton. So let’s just look at the only two things that she is relying on to stake her claim -- her gender and her marriage (i.e. her husband). Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/08/hillarys_qualifications.html#ixzz3jMhB8KY6 #COVERUP: Clinton aides’ BlackBerrys likely destroyed.
DC Tom Posted August 20, 2015 Posted August 20, 2015 #COVERUP: Clinton aides’ BlackBerrys likely destroyed. "But it's wrong when I do it????" -Brady
IDBillzFan Posted August 20, 2015 Posted August 20, 2015 (edited) Hillary's Qualifications How did it happen that, in this the land of Washington, Jefferson, Madison et al, someone so fundamentally dishonest and so unbelievably incompetent should not only aspire to be its president, but should actually be taken seriously in this aspiration by one of the country’s two major parties? I cannot recall any presidential contender from either party over the past 60 years as fundamentally undeserving of such a distinction as Hillary Clinton. So let’s just look at the only two things that she is relying on to stake her claim -- her gender and her marriage (i.e. her husband). I saw a Monica Crowley article suggesting Obama is behind all of this email leak stuff to wreck Hillary so Joe Biden could run one term, with Fauxohantus as VP...to keep the Obama transformation going. Usually I find that stuff a bit nutty, but with Biden's one-term trial balloon, and Warren laying low, I don't think it's too far-fetched. Edited August 20, 2015 by LABillzFan
IDBillzFan Posted August 20, 2015 Posted August 20, 2015 A woman of the people...a fighter for the middle class...someone who listens to her staged constituents. Good ol' Hillary. Oh, and she takes the K Street cash like no others.
Tiberius Posted August 20, 2015 Posted August 20, 2015 A woman of the people...a fighter for the middle class...someone who listens to her staged constituents. Good ol' Hillary. Oh, and she takes the K Street cash like no others. Looks like she has a healthy relationship with corporate America. Hard to label her a socialist
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted August 20, 2015 Posted August 20, 2015 Looks like she has a healthy relationship with corporate America. Hard to label her a socialist staggering.
DC Tom Posted August 20, 2015 Posted August 20, 2015 Looks like she has a healthy relationship with corporate America. Hard to label her a socialist Can you expound on this further?
Azalin Posted August 20, 2015 Posted August 20, 2015 Can you expound on this further? Stop obfuscating.
Magox Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 (edited) Bombshell report from Reuters. This story will be discussed quite a bit. For months, the U.S. State Department has stood behind its former boss Hillary Clinton as she has repeatedly said she did not send or receive classified information on her unsecured, private email account, a practice the government forbids. While the department is now stamping a few dozen of the publicly released emails as "Classified," it stresses this is not evidence of rule-breaking. Those stamps are new, it says, and do not mean the information was classified when Clinton, the Democratic frontrunner in the 2016 presidential election, first sent or received it. But the details included in those "Classified" stamps — which include a string of dates, letters and numbers describing the nature of the classification — appear to undermine this account, a Reuters examination of the emails and the relevant regulations has found. The new stamps indicate that some of Clinton's emails from her time as the nation's most senior diplomat are filled with a type of information the U.S. government and the department's own regulations automatically deems classified from the get-go — regardless of whether it is already marked that way or not. In the small fraction of emails made public so far, Reuters has found at least 30 email threads from 2009, representing scores of individual emails, that include what the State Department's own "Classified" stamps now identify as so-called 'foreign government information.' The U.S. government defines this as any information, written or spoken, provided in confidence to U.S. officials by their foreign counterparts. This sort of information, which the department says Clinton both sent and received in her emails, is the only kind that must be "presumed" classified, in part to protect national security and the integrity of diplomatic interactions, according to U.S. regulations examined by Reuters. "It's born classified," said J. William Leonard, a former director of the U.S. government's Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO). Leonard was director of ISOO, part of the White House's National Archives and Records Administration, from 2002 until 2008, and worked for both the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. Edited August 21, 2015 by Magox
Ozymandius Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 Looks like she has a healthy relationship with corporate America. Hard to label her a socialist Actually, cronyism goes hand-in-hand with socialism. You can't get anything done unless you're connected with (i.e. bribed) government officials. Dummy.
Magox Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 Actually, cronyism goes hand-in-hand with socialism. You can't get anything done unless you're connected with (i.e. bribed) government officials. Dummy. But you support the king of cronyism. I don't get it, are you a socialist?
Ozymandius Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 But you support the king of cronyism. I don't get it, are you a socialist? I'm supporting the candidate who is honest about cronyism and is now campaigning for office without accepting bribes. You've moved onto Rubio apparently, but you don't get it, your candidate isn't really Rubio. It's Sheldon Adelson. Rubio is Adelson's biotch. BTW, anyone who likes to gamble on the internet needs to be against Rubio. Adelson will make sure that Rubio bans internet gambling.
Tiberius Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 So Hillary is a corporate communist now? Staggering!
Ozymandius Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 So Hillary is a corporate communist now? Staggering! If it makes you feel better, so is Jeb.
keepthefaith Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 (edited) So Hillary is a corporate communist now? Staggering! Add that to liar, corrupt, old, slow, white, frumpy, with marxist tendencies and without any noteworthy accomplishments. Edited August 21, 2015 by keepthefaith
Chef Jim Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 So Hillary is a corporate communist now? Staggering! Corporate shill more like it.
Chef Jim Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 In what way? She's a !@#$ing politician nimrod. They all are.
Tiberius Posted August 21, 2015 Posted August 21, 2015 She's a !@#$ing politician nimrod. They all are. Ha ha,one question and you lose it and start with the name calling! What a light weight
Recommended Posts