Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Repeating yourself over and over again? Yup, a 12 year old boy/girl

 

Why you picking on girls, dude?

 

No I'm picking on a pathetic 40 year old (still hard to believe) that acts like a girl.

 

Both parties are corrupt. Who are you kidding.

Posted

Ya, ya, ya, and she murdered Vince Foster, too. You are still angry as all hell about that, aren't you? Or have you moved on? You loser

This motivates me to donate money to a research organization that examines the liberal brain with the aim to develop methods of correcting or eliminating that birth defect.

Posted

This motivates me to donate money to a research organization that examines the liberal brain with the aim to develop methods of correcting or eliminating that birth defect.

liberal brains do most of the research at such centers.

Posted

 

If Sandy Berger got probation for hiding TS material in his socks, I can't see much happening to Hillary.

 

 

Unless Obama is clearing the decks for Joe Biden.

Posted

COMIC CANARIES IN THE POLITICAL COAL MINE:

Steven Hayward at Power Line ponders how the “Late-Nite Comic Indicator” portends trouble for Hillary Clinton:

 

From last night, Conan:

A new poll shows that Hillary Clinton is only six points ahead of Bernie Sanders. Today a very confident Hillary said, “Oh, please. Like I’m going to lose the Democratic nomination to a left-wing senator nobody’s ever heard of?”

 

 

 

And then Jimmy Fallon on The Tonight Show:

 

Hillary Clinton has a $350 billion plan that she says will make college more affordable. Which has to be better than my parents’ plan to make college affordable: “Be good at sports.”

A PAC supporting Hillary Clinton just received an anonymous donation of $1 million. Which means that if she wins any of us can say that it was us that gave her the million bucks and hit her up for a favor.

What’s really interesting is that this million
-dollar donation from an anonymous donor came just two weeks after Hillary spoke out against, quote, “the endless flow of secret, unaccountable money” into campaigns. Then she said, “Starting now! Unaccountable money is awful. Cash it quick!”

 

 

Drip, drip, drip. . .

Posted

COMIC CANARIES IN THE POLITICAL COAL MINE:

Steven Hayward at Power Line ponders how the “Late-Nite Comic Indicator” portends trouble for Hillary Clinton:

 

From last night, Conan:

A new poll shows that Hillary Clinton is only six points ahead of Bernie Sanders. Today a very confident Hillary said, “Oh, please. Like I’m going to lose the Democratic nomination to a left-wing senator nobody’s ever heard of?”

 

 

 

And then Jimmy Fallon on The Tonight Show:

 

Hillary Clinton has a $350 billion plan that she says will make college more affordable. Which has to be better than my parents’ plan to make college affordable: “Be good at sports.”

A PAC supporting Hillary Clinton just received an anonymous donation of $1 million. Which means that if she wins any of us can say that it was us that gave her the million bucks and hit her up for a favor.

What’s really interesting is that this million-dollar donation from an anonymous donor came just two weeks after Hillary spoke out against, quote, “the endless flow of secret, unaccountable money” into campaigns. Then she said, “Starting now! Unaccountable money is awful. Cash it quick!”

 

 

Drip, drip, drip. . .

 

It's amazing to me how libs mock the Republican field when there is so much material just with Hillary and Bernie.

 

Feel the Bern!!!

Posted

This Hillary story isn't even among the two dozen stories on the front page of NY Times Mobil. For those who deny the left wing bias in the media, do you honestly believe a Republican presidential front runner accused of felonies, and already caught in lies regarding those felonies, would fly under the radar?

Posted

Top secret. SI. TK. NOFORN.

 

FUBAR'd

 

In short: Information at the “TOP SECRET//SI//TK//NOFORN” level is considered exceptionally highly classified and must be handled with great care under penalty of serious consequences for mishandling. Every person who is cleared and “read on” for access to such information signs reams of paperwork and receives detailed training about how it is to be handled, no exceptions—and what the consequences will be if the rules are not followed.

 

In the real world, people with high-level clearances are severely punished for willfully violating such rules. At a minimum, those suspected of mishandling things like NSA “signals intelligence”—intercepts calls, emails, and the like—have their clearances suspended pending the outcome of the investigation into their misconduct. Any personal items—computers, electronics—where federal investigators suspect the classified wound up, wrongly, will be impounded and searched. If it has TOP SECRET//SI information on it, “your” computer now belongs to the government, since it is considered classified.

 

And this is the Daily Beast reporting this.

 

But hey...how 'bout that GOP clown car, amirite? :lol:

 

 

Posted

Would Republicans who don't like Trump vote for Clinton in the general election? I doubt it.

 

Tell me if I'm wrong, but I could see some Republicans who don't like Trump voting for Sanders if he won the ticket. Bernie is much less unlikable than Trump, and Clinton too.

 

Those likability and familiarity numbers will be really interesting to watch.

Posted (edited)

Would Republicans who don't like Trump vote for Clinton in the general election? I doubt it.

 

Tell me if I'm wrong, but I could see some Republicans who don't like Trump voting for Sanders if he won the ticket. Bernie is much less unlikable than Trump, and Clinton too.

 

Those likability and familiarity numbers will be really interesting to watch.

Can't imagine any repubes voting for a socialist. And if comes down to like-ability versus politics, Im guessing faced with a choice of Trump's 1st lady ...

 

 

Melania+Trump+Donald+Trump+married+HpaHx

 

.... or president Hillary ...

 

hillaryscowl2.jpg

 

 

... most go with team Trump

Edited by JTSP
Posted (edited)

Just picture this person standing at the podium at the UN, sitting in THE chair in the White House War Room, one-on-one with Vlad Putin, giving direction the the Joint Chiefs of Staff,

 

Well, it isn't a pretty picture, is it.

post-9932-0-18352200-1439464543_thumb.jpg

Edited by Keukasmallies
Posted

really? we're down to physical attractiveness as a qualification? i'm guessing abe lincoln wouldn't have earned yall's vote. otoh, it does explain reagan's the popularity among cons. who ever said cons were superficial?

Posted

really? we're down to physical attractiveness as a qualification? i'm guessing abe lincoln wouldn't have earned yall's vote. otoh, it does explain reagan's the popularity among cons. who ever said cons were superficial?

Cankles

Posted

really? we're down to physical attractiveness as a qualification?

 

Because looking like Tim Conway's Dorf character really helped John McCain.

 

You're fooling yourself if you don't think attractiveness plays a role. You may not like it, but it's a simple reality, especially with Generation Selfie.

×
×
  • Create New...