Doc Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Sounds a lot like Barack Obama circa 2008. How'd that turn out? Bad. Very bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Sounds a lot like Barack Obama circa 2008. Ya think?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Bad. Very bad. Remember, though, that the people who would vote for Liz are the same people who believe Barry has done a great job and that all of his critics simply hate his skin color. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Remember, though, that the people who would vote for Liz are the same people who believe Barry has done a great job and that all of his critics simply hate his skin color. Thanks for making my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) joined the fight, suggesting that it was calling Warren by her first name that was “disrespectful.” . So sayeth Queen...uh...Windsor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 13, 2015 Share Posted May 13, 2015 Thanks for making my point. Your point was that there is no way there are enough votes for Liz to win? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 (edited) Why isn't Hillary held to the same standard as Bob McDonnell? http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/387154/mcdonnells-go-down-nearly-all-felony-counts-tim-cavanaugh Edited May 14, 2015 by Rob's House Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Why isn't Hillary held to the same standard as Bob McDonnell? http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/387154/mcdonnells-go-down-nearly-all-felony-counts-tim-cavanaugh Because the McDonnells accepted the money directly, without laundering it through a charitable organization first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Because the McDonnells accepted the money directly, without laundering it through a charitable organization first. Yes, the Clintons were/are much better at the corruption game and should be given a pass based on their skill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Bloomberg - Kim Dotcom: Assange Will Be Clinton's Worst Nightmare http://bloom.bg/1PkjHPk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 Because the McDonnells accepted the money directly, without laundering it through a charitable organization first. Pretty much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 14, 2015 Share Posted May 14, 2015 SO WITH ALL THE TALK ABOUT JEB BUSH AND THE IRAQ QUESTION, HERE’S MINE FOR HILLARY: Given that before the troop pullout in 2011, even the Obama Administration was touting Iraq as a big success — if you had it to do over again, would you yank the troops out and leave Iraq to ISIS? Think anyone will ask her? Of course, first they’d have to ask her anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted May 14, 2015 Author Share Posted May 14, 2015 Bloomberg - Kim Dotcom: Assange Will Be Clinton's Worst Nightmare http://bloom.bg/1PkjHPk How many days does that guy have left before the Clintons arrange for his, ah, er, ah, hem... removal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 (edited) I dont begrudge anyone earning money, but geez these Clinton's sure are milking the speaker circuit. They made $30 million over last 16 months for paid speaking engagements to banks, corporations and other organizations. Since 2001 they've made $125 million. http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/05/16/us/politics/clintons-reportedly-earned-30-million-in-the-last-16-months.html?_r=0&referrer= Edited May 16, 2015 by JTSP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted May 16, 2015 Author Share Posted May 16, 2015 I dont begrudge anyone earning money, but geez these Clinton's sure are milking the speaker circuit. They made $30 million over last 16 months for paid speaking engagements to banks, corporations and other organizations. Since 2001 they've made $125 million. http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/05/16/us/politics/clintons-reportedly-earned-30-million-in-the-last-16-months.html?_r=0&referrer= Really? Holy schnikies! Just wait till the mainstream media gets ahold of that story. She's finished, I tell ya. Finished! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Really? Holy schnikies! Just wait till the mainstream media gets ahold of that story. She's finished, I tell ya. Finished! Google "Hillary broke" and you find more stories about her regretting and apologizing for her "misstatement" than you do about the statement itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Google "Hillary broke" and you find more stories about her regretting and apologizing for her "misstatement" than you do about the statement itself. I think anyone paying attention to Google knows their plan for 2016. They drive the search results and can place whatever they prefer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 I think anyone paying attention to Google knows their plan for 2016. They drive the search results and can place whatever they prefer. Don't worry, they'll bury messy webpages like this a few dozen pages deep where nobody will notice them: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00237 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Don't worry, they'll bury messy webpages like this a few dozen pages deep where nobody will notice them: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00237 Im going to make my own bumper sticker. Sen. Clinton Voted for The Iraq War Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Im going to make my own bumper sticker. Sen. Clinton Voted for The Iraq War Maybe you can get a two for one deal and get a cheap bumper sticker that says you are a one trick pony too. Two administrations waged it but only one made it a useless endeavor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts