IDBillzFan Posted May 12, 2015 Posted May 12, 2015 But you know she's going to get major help from the moderators. Mitt Romney kicked Obama's azz in the first debate and he left Jim Leher's head spinning like a dervish. Candy Crowley rescued B. O. in the second, and Mitt never recovered his momentum. Whomever is the R. nominee, they need to learn from that experience and expect the media to sabotage the debates. A preemptive strategy must be employed, and I like what OC proposed. I think whomever it is so hit the audience with a litany of ways that they are unlike Ms. Clinton. I don't control a 2 billion dollar charitable trust The charities I contribute to use more than 10 cents on the contributed dollar for charitable work Haven't accepted donations from foreigners and foreign governments Didn't blame the death of 4 Americans on a disgusting Internet video and on, and on, and on... Never went muff diving with Yoko Ono.
OCinBuffalo Posted May 12, 2015 Posted May 12, 2015 Never went muff diving with Yoko Ono. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5YIJ1pZEBc We always thought Hillary was Bill's Yoko Ono. Now it seems Hillary was also Yoko Ono's Yoko Ono.
Doc Posted May 12, 2015 Posted May 12, 2015 No they don't. Deep down liberals know HiIllary is a scumbag. But she's their scumbag. So any relevant details must be ignored for the greater good you know. Yep. She's little different from Romney except for being a worse candidate, but they'll still pull for her no matter what. Oh man so am I. The only weak debater amongst the GOP field is: I don't know. It doesn't matter who wins, all of them will tear her up. The real danger is not Hillary, it's the R political consultants who tell the R nominee to nerf his/her remarks for the "optics", i.e. "don't want to be seen as verbally berating a woman". F that. You now how no matter what the 1st question in a debate is, they never answer it without doing their own thing first? I advise the R candidate to start with: "I'm gonig to warn all of you right now that I am going to be very tough on my opponent. I am not a sexist, and therefore it would be wrong of me to take it easy on her because she is a woman. Since she hasn't done any explaining to the press, she's going to have to do some here, and that is going to be the theme tonight". Wham, and go right into attack mode. It's the Reagan age/experince thing, just inverted. I'd go right after it in debate 1, sentence 2, right after the usual "I want to thank everyone" crap. That's what Fiorina is there for. And if not, I'd leave the sexism thing for the attack ads. But you know she's going to get major help from the moderators. Mitt Romney kicked Obama's azz in the first debate and he left Jim Leher's head spinning like a dervish. Candy Crowley rescued B. O. in the second, and Mitt never recovered his momentum. Whomever is the R. nominee, they need to learn from that experience and expect the media to sabotage the debates. A preemptive strategy must be employed, and I like what OC proposed. I think whomever it is so hit the audience with a litany of ways that they are unlike Ms. Clinton. I don't control a 2 billion dollar charitable trust The charities I contribute to use more than 10 cents on the contributed dollar for charitable work Haven't accepted donations from foreigners and foreign governments Didn't blame the death of 4 Americans on a disgusting Internet video and on, and on, and on... I didn't pay my female staffers 72 cents on the dollar compared to my male staffers I didn't vote for the Iraq war
3rdnlng Posted May 12, 2015 Posted May 12, 2015 Dear Abby,My husband is a liar and a cheat. He has cheated on me from the beginning, and, when I confront him, he denies everything. What's worse, everyone knows that he cheats on me. It is so humiliating. Also, since he lost his job 14 years ago, he hasn't even looked for a new one. All he does all day is smoke cigars, cruise around and shoot the bull with his buddies, while I have to work to pay the bills. Since our daughter went away to college he doesn't even pretend to like me, and even hints that I may be a lesbian. What should I do? Signed: Clueless Dear Abby Responds To This Pathetic Soul Dear Clueless: Grow up and dump him. Good grief woman, you're running for President of the United States.
IDBillzFan Posted May 12, 2015 Posted May 12, 2015 I think with all the problems Hillary has been running into, and her clear inability to answer any questions for fear of botching the whole thing again, there's really only one thing to do. Sing along. It's a very catchy tune.
Nanker Posted May 12, 2015 Author Posted May 12, 2015 Never went muff diving with Yoko Ono. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5YIJ1pZEBc We always thought Hillary was Bill's Yoko Ono. Now it seems Hillary was also Yoko Ono's Yoko Ono. I didn't pay my female staffers 72 cents on the dollar compared to my male staffers I didn't vote for the Iraq war Good work gents!
Chef Jim Posted May 12, 2015 Posted May 12, 2015 I think with all the problems Hillary has been running into, and her clear inability to answer any questions for fear of botching the whole thing again, there's really only one thing to do. Sing along. It's a very catchy tune. I !@#$ing hate you.
IDBillzFan Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 NOW: Obama was sexist toward Fauxcahontas Warren because he called her by her first name. I thought all the sexist talk was supposed to be saved for critics of Hillary. If they start using it on Fauxcahontas AND Hillary, it will soon be just another overused cliche with no value. Like calling someone a racist.
DC Tom Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 Me too. That song was terrible. That song's quite the paradox: it makes me want to kill myself, yet makes suicide redundant.
Doc Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 I now know what Rebecca Black has been doing since her "Friday" hit.
B-Man Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 How a super PAC plans to coordinate directly with Hillary Clinton’s campaign By Mattea Gold http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/05/12/how-a-super-pac-plans-to-coordinate-directly-with-hillary-clintons-campaign/ Hillary Clinton’s campaign plans to work in tight conjunction with an independent rapid-response group financed by unlimited donations, another novel form of political outsourcing that has emerged as a dominant practice in the 2016 presidential race. On Tuesday, Correct the Record, a pro-Clinton rapid-response operation, announced it was splitting off from its parent American Bridge and will work in coordination with the Clinton campaign as a stand-alone super PAC. The group’s move was first reported by the New York Times. That befuddled many campaign finance experts, who noted that super PACs, by definition, are political committees that solely do independent expenditures, which cannot be coordinated with a candidate or political party. Several said the relationship between the campaign and the super PAC would test the legal limits. But Correct the Record believes it can avoid the coordination ban by relying on a 2006 Federal Election Commission regulation that declared that content posted online for free, such as blogs, is off limits from regulation. The “Internet exemption” said that such free postings do not constitute campaign expenditures, allowing independent groups to consult with candidates about the content they post on their sites. By adopting the measure, the FEC limited its online jurisdiction to regulating paid political ads. The rules “totally exempt individuals who engage in political activity on the Internet from the restrictions of the campaign finance laws. The exemption for individual Internet activity in the final rules is categorical and unqualified,” then-FEC Chairman Michael E. Toner said at the time, according to a 2006 Washington Post story. The pro-Clinton group plans to keep its activities within the bounds of the Internet exemption by disseminating information about Clinton on its Web site and through its Facebook and Twitter accounts, officials said. The group will be registered as a super PAC, but does not intend to spend any money on ads or other expenditures that would constitute independent political activity. However, the FEC rules specify that online activities are exempted from campaign finance rules if they are conducted by "uncompensated" individuals, campaign finance lawyers noted. It is unclear how Correct the Record, whose staff will be paid, plans to navigate that restriction. "The moment anyone is paid to engage in Internet activity it falls outside of that exemption," said Jason Torchinsky, an election law attorney . "If you are a super PAC paying people and coordinating your activities with the campaign, you are not covered by the individual Internet exemption and are making impermissible in-kind contributions." .
reddogblitz Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 (edited) That's what the Clinton's do. Several said the relationship between the campaign and the super PAC would test the legal limits. Edited May 13, 2015 by reddogblitz
B-Man Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 Run, Liz. Run! Now, Now........didn't you hear ?...............calling her liz is "sexist" NOW President called President Obama “sexist” for saying Elizabeth Warren is a “politician like everybody else,”–which, by the way is redonkulous, since saying a female politician is “like everybody else” is utterly gender-neutral– Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) joined the fight, suggesting that it was calling Warren by her first name that was “disrespectful.” It’s kind of fun to watch the Democrats get all stuck to their own progressive Tar Baby. .
reddogblitz Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 (edited) Run, Liz. Run! Be careful what you ask for. IMHO Liz could snatch the nomination away from Hillary. Her populist talk is very popular right now for good reason. But she's not a johnny come lately like Hillary on the subject. She could follow Barack Obama's 2008 blueprint as the outsider coming in to do things differently. She could get the you the youth mobilized like Barack did. And my own 2 cents, if she were to promise to take MJ off of the schedule 1 list (which according to my understanding (could be wrong), the president could do on her own), she would be hard to beat. Edited May 13, 2015 by reddogblitz
Chef Jim Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 Now, Now........didn't you hear ?...............calling her liz is "sexist" NOW President called President Obama “sexist” for saying Elizabeth Warren is a “politician like everybody else,”–which, by the way is redonkulous, since saying a female politician is “like everybody else” is utterly gender-neutral– Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) joined the fight, suggesting that it was calling Warren by her first name that was “disrespectful.” It’s kind of fun to watch the Democrats get all stuck to their own progressive Tar Baby. . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0CprVYsG0k
IDBillzFan Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 Be careful what you ask for. I'm certain what the American people will be clamoring for in the 2016 election will be a one-term Senator whose entire professional career was built on affirmative action,includes literally zero executive experience, and whose only experience running anything is limited to a political campaign, and a mouth telling everyone that they're not responsible for their crappy lives. Run, Liz. Run.
reddogblitz Posted May 13, 2015 Posted May 13, 2015 I'm certain what the American people will be clamoring for in the 2016 election will be a one-term Senator whose entire professional career was built on affirmative action,includes literally zero executive experience, and whose only experience running anything is limited to a political campaign, and a mouth telling everyone that they're not responsible for their crappy lives. Run, Liz. Run. Sounds a lot like Barack Obama circa 2008. How'd that turn out?
Recommended Posts