Nanker Posted January 26, 2017 Author Share Posted January 26, 2017 Can she get on the Biggest Loser? The Real Housewives of Chappaqua? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 28, 2017 Share Posted January 28, 2017 (edited) Edited February 13, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 3, 2017 Share Posted February 3, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 4, 2017 Author Share Posted February 4, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 POLITICO: Hillary Clinton Is Running Again. Here’s Proof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 POLITICO: Hillary Clinton Is Running Again. Here’s Proof. Good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 POLITICO: Hillary Clinton Is Running Again. Here’s Proof. Hillary 2020 - Maybe This Time!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 She can raise a **** ton of money and her daughter gets to be the heiress of the power. I don't think "H"'s ego can handle her daughter succeeding at something she failed at, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 Hillary 2020 - Maybe This Time!!! Geez. All the great Hillary metaphors I'm missing by not having kids.....oh crap. It would be grandkids now wouldn't it. WTF am I thinking. My grandkids would would be teenagers by now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 Geez. All the great Hillary metaphors I'm missing by not having kids.....oh crap. It would be grandkids now wouldn't it. WTF am I thinking. My grandkids would would be teenagers by now. The days of animated movies being just for kids are long gone. I'm not a Seinfeld fan, but "Bee Movie" is pretty damn funny. A bee finds out humans are keeping bees in camps just to make honey, so he sues the honey industry. By the time he gets Sting on the stand...well...it starts going down the road of Critical Bee Theory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 The days of animated movies being just for kids are long gone. I'm not a Seinfeld fan, but "Bee Movie" is pretty damn funny. A bee finds out humans are keeping bees in camps just to make honey, so he sues the honey industry. By the time he gets Sting on the stand...well...it starts going down the road of Critical Bee Theory. Want to watch a good "Bee" show? Black Mirror - Hated in the Nation on Netflix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 Want to watch a good "Bee" show? Black Mirror - Hated in the Nation on Netflix. Good one, but not as good as the blackmail episode, which IMO was the best of the series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 Good one, but not as good as the blackmail episode, which IMO was the best of the series. That one my favorite along with The Whole History of You. Need to start a thread #DeathTo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 That one my favorite along with The Whole History of You. Need to start a thread #DeathTo I know, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 14, 2017 Author Share Posted February 14, 2017 Thank you Donald Trump. You're not really my kind of guy, but I give you props that you beat The Bushes, The Clintons, and The Obamas in succession. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 14, 2017 Share Posted February 14, 2017 Thank you Donald Trump. You're not really my kind of guy, but I give you props that you beat The Bushes, The Clintons, and The Obamas in succession. Right? That in and of itself has earned some respect from me. That and his reinforcing of the movement to end elitist technocratic globalism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 (edited) Patriots release................... New Freedom Of Information Act release: Obama admin knew immediately Benghazi was “direct breaching” terror attack, not “under cover of protest” Perhaps the subject of the terror attack on the US consulate in Benghazi will become more academic than political after the 2016 election denied Hillary Clinton the presidency. For now, though, documents continue to emerge that contradict the narrative created by Hillary and the Barack Obama White House about the nature of the attack. Yesterday, Judicial Watch received 54 more pages from its FOIA lawsuits and came across a bombshell buried in them. Notes of a State Department briefing for Congressional aides on the day after the attack show Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy acknowledging that the attack was not a protest gone bad, or even an attack under the cover of protest. It was, Kennedy told the Congressional aides, “a direct breaching attack” That’s highly significant. Kennedy’s description of events in these notes matches pretty well with the final recap, although it appears to elide over the fact that it was two separate attacks over 13 hours rather than just one attack. It’s accurate on the “direct breaching attack” and the use of medium weaponry, all indications of a planned attack, and Kennedy even points out that a terror group had taken credit for the attack without naming it (Ansar al-Shariah, which later turned out to be accurate). By September 12th, the State Department knew full well that there was no factual basis to claim that it was anything other than a planned terrorist attack and had already told Congress the same thing. And yet, State and the White House had Rice make that case anyway, less than two months before the 2012 presidential election. Edited February 15, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 Patriots release................... New Freedom Of Information Act release: Obama admin knew immediately Benghazi was direct breaching terror attack, not under cover of protest Perhaps the subject of the terror attack on the US consulate in Benghazi will become more academic than political after the 2016 election denied Hillary Clinton the presidency. For now, though, documents continue to emerge that contradict the narrative created by Hillary and the Barack Obama White House about the nature of the attack. Yesterday, Judicial Watch received 54 more pages from its FOIA lawsuits and came across a bombshell buried in them. Notes of a State Department briefing for Congressional aides on the day after the attack show Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy acknowledging that the attack was not a protest gone bad, or even an attack under the cover of protest. It was, Kennedy told the Congressional aides, a direct breaching attack Thats highly significant. Kennedys description of events in these notes matches pretty well with the final recap, although it appears to elide over the fact that it was two separate attacks over 13 hours rather than just one attack. Its accurate on the direct breaching attack and the use of medium weaponry, all indications of a planned attack, and Kennedy even points out that a terror group had taken credit for the attack without naming it (Ansar al-Shariah, which later turned out to be accurate). By September 12th, the State Department knew full well that there was no factual basis to claim that it was anything other than a planned terrorist attack and had already told Congress the same thing. And yet, State and the White House had Rice make that case anyway, less than two months before the 2012 presidential election. at this point what difference does it make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts