Jump to content

Hillary's Campaign Kickoff


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

 

Geez. All the great Hillary metaphors I'm missing by not having kids.....oh crap. It would be grandkids now wouldn't it. WTF am I thinking. My grandkids would would be teenagers by now. :cry:

 

The days of animated movies being just for kids are long gone.

 

I'm not a Seinfeld fan, but "Bee Movie" is pretty damn funny. A bee finds out humans are keeping bees in camps just to make honey, so he sues the honey industry. By the time he gets Sting on the stand...well...it starts going down the road of Critical Bee Theory.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The days of animated movies being just for kids are long gone.

 

I'm not a Seinfeld fan, but "Bee Movie" is pretty damn funny. A bee finds out humans are keeping bees in camps just to make honey, so he sues the honey industry. By the time he gets Sting on the stand...well...it starts going down the road of Critical Bee Theory.

 

 

Want to watch a good "Bee" show? Black Mirror - Hated in the Nation on Netflix. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Donald Trump.

You're not really my kind of guy, but I give you props that you beat The Bushes, The Clintons, and The Obamas in succession.

 

Right?

 

That in and of itself has earned some respect from me. That and his reinforcing of the movement to end elitist technocratic globalism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patriots release................... :lol:

 

New Freedom Of Information Act release: Obama admin knew immediately Benghazi was “direct breaching” terror attack, not “under cover of protest”

 

 

Perhaps the subject of the terror attack on the US consulate in Benghazi will become more academic than political after the 2016 election denied Hillary Clinton the presidency.

 

For now, though, documents continue to emerge that contradict the narrative created by Hillary and the Barack Obama White House about the nature of the attack. Yesterday, Judicial Watch received 54 more pages from its FOIA lawsuits and came across a bombshell buried in them. Notes of a State Department briefing for Congressional aides on the day after the attack show Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy acknowledging that the attack was not a protest gone bad, or even an attack under the cover of protest.

 

It was, Kennedy told the Congressional aides, “a direct breaching attack”

That’s highly significant. Kennedy’s description of events in these notes matches pretty well with the final recap, although it appears to elide over the fact that it was two separate attacks over 13 hours rather than just one attack. It’s accurate on the “direct breaching attack” and the use of medium weaponry, all indications of a planned attack, and Kennedy even points out that a terror group had taken credit for the attack without naming it (Ansar al-Shariah, which later turned out to be accurate).

By September 12th, the State Department knew full well that there was no factual basis to claim that it was anything other than a planned terrorist attack and had already told Congress the same thing. And yet, State and the White House had Rice make that case anyway, less than two months before the 2012 presidential election.

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patriots release................... :lol:

 

New Freedom Of Information Act release: Obama admin knew immediately Benghazi was direct breaching terror attack, not under cover of protest

 

 

Perhaps the subject of the terror attack on the US consulate in Benghazi will become more academic than political after the 2016 election denied Hillary Clinton the presidency.

 

For now, though, documents continue to emerge that contradict the narrative created by Hillary and the Barack Obama White House about the nature of the attack. Yesterday, Judicial Watch received 54 more pages from its FOIA lawsuits and came across a bombshell buried in them. Notes of a State Department briefing for Congressional aides on the day after the attack show Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy acknowledging that the attack was not a protest gone bad, or even an attack under the cover of protest.

 

It was, Kennedy told the Congressional aides, a direct breaching attack

Thats highly significant. Kennedys description of events in these notes matches pretty well with the final recap, although it appears to elide over the fact that it was two separate attacks over 13 hours rather than just one attack. Its accurate on the direct breaching attack and the use of medium weaponry, all indications of a planned attack, and Kennedy even points out that a terror group had taken credit for the attack without naming it (Ansar al-Shariah, which later turned out to be accurate).

By September 12th, the State Department knew full well that there was no factual basis to claim that it was anything other than a planned terrorist attack and had already told Congress the same thing. And yet, State and the White House had Rice make that case anyway, less than two months before the 2012 presidential election.

at this point what difference does it make.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...