Nanker Posted December 9, 2016 Author Posted December 9, 2016 Shirley ewe canned bee Sirius. Fast and furious IRS targeting Tea Party groups Saving Private Berghdal Benghazi Murders Youtubegate The Arab Spring The overthrow of Mubarak and Gadaffi Iraq retreat and rise of Isis Can't say Islamic Terrorism Release of Gitmo detainees Solyndra The GM bailout
Taro T Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 What scandals were there? I don't recall any Watergate, Travel gate, Iran Contra, Monica, Paula Jones type of things. Osama was killed on BO's watch. Um, Fast & Furious, & IRS targeting conservative groups just for starters. Not sure where you were going w/ the Bin Laden reference. Ambassador Stevens was killed on his watch as well.
grinreaper Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 What scandals were there? I don't recall any Watergate, Travel gate, Iran Contra, Monica, Paula Jones type of things. Osama was killed on BO's watch. Holy schit, are you serious?
B-Man Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 THEY HAVE LEARNED NOTHING, AND FORGOTTEN NOTHING: Pelosi Confirms Plan to Treat Sanders Progressives as Second-Class Citizens: After Hillary Clinton’s stunning loss, the only thing Democratic elites plan on changing is their party’s marketing strategy.
Nanker Posted December 9, 2016 Author Posted December 9, 2016 Yes. I agree and concur wholeheartedly with Nancy. They just need to get their message heard. That's all. Maybe she can speak more slowly, and have her henchmen read along with her all the while mouthing the words as they read their "correct" message. Please, just keep saying the same things over and over and over again. It's bound to sink in sooner or later. Amirite?
keepthefaith Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 THEY HAVE LEARNED NOTHING, AND FORGOTTEN NOTHING: Pelosi Confirms Plan to Treat Sanders Progressives as Second-Class Citizens: After Hillary Clinton’s stunning loss, the only thing Democratic elites plan on changing is their party’s marketing strategy. She is the consummate politician. Arrogant, interested only in political wins, and not interested in solving anything. Incapable of solving real problems. As fake and incompetent as they come.
IDBillzFan Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 Yes. I agree and concur wholeheartedly with Nancy. They just need to get their message heard. That's all. The funniest part of all of this right now is reading that Obama wants to investigate who hacked into the DNC systems. You see, the problem isn't that the emails showed the world what a bunch of elitist, condescending, racist nutbags the DNC comprises. The problem is that someone SHOWED the world what a bunch of elitist, condescending, racist nutbags the DNC comprises...and that person must be found. I don't know who they are, but they should avoid visiting any parks in the near term.
DC Tom Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 The funniest part of all of this right now is reading that Obama wants to investigate who hacked into the DNC systems. You see, the problem isn't that the emails showed the world what a bunch of elitist, condescending, racist nutbags the DNC comprises. The problem is that someone SHOWED the world what a bunch of elitist, condescending, racist nutbags the DNC comprises...and that person must be found. I don't know who they are, but they should avoid visiting any parks in the near term. Of course, you know what this means? Obama just ordered another investigation in to Hillary's email server.
Deranged Rhino Posted December 9, 2016 Posted December 9, 2016 (edited) The funniest part of all of this right now is reading that Obama wants to investigate who hacked into the DNC systems. You see, the problem isn't that the emails showed the world what a bunch of elitist, condescending, racist nutbags the DNC comprises. The problem is that someone SHOWED the world what a bunch of elitist, condescending, racist nutbags the DNC comprises...and that person must be found. I don't know who they are, but they should avoid visiting any parks in the near term. It is and continues to be a faction of the US intelligence community, both civilian and military. Assange made that clear before he was disappeared. Several other sources from within the intelligence community, including Steve Pieczenik (the real life Jack Ryan whom Clancy based his character on). Pieczenik, who isn't without his own question marks, has been openly calling this a bloodless coup against the Clintons for weeks now. ...But you can't have the president admitting that the intelligence community is fractured and involved in an uprising against his chosen successor. It's "safer" to gin up some anti-Russian rhetoric instead of admitting the truth. Edited December 9, 2016 by Deranged Rhino
B-Man Posted December 11, 2016 Posted December 11, 2016 From yesterday's "runoff" The Democrat Senate nominee in Louisiana couldn’t even crack 40% in run-off. A state that till ’05 had 2 Dem senators. I blame Russian Hackers...............
/dev/null Posted December 11, 2016 Posted December 11, 2016 From yesterday's "runoff" The Democrat Senate nominee in Louisiana couldn’t even crack 40% in run-off. A state that till ’05 had 2 Dem senators. I blame Russian Hackers............... deplorable
/dev/null Posted December 11, 2016 Posted December 11, 2016 From yesterday's "runoff" The Democrat Senate nominee in Louisiana couldn’t even crack 40% in run-off. A state that till ’05 had 2 Dem senators. I blame Russian Hackers............... First Trump breaks the Blue Wall. Now even John Kennedy is a Republican
B-Man Posted December 18, 2016 Posted December 18, 2016 It’s Official: Clinton’s Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California. Democrats who are having trouble getting out of the first stage of grief — denial — aren’t being helped by the fact that, now that all the votes are counted, Hillary Clinton’s lead in the popular vote has topped 2.8 million, giving her a 48% share of the vote compared with Trumps 46%. To those unschooled in how the United States selects presidents, this seems totally unfair. But look more closely at the numbers and you see that Clinton’s advantage all but disappears. As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton’s overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton’s huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump. California is the only state, in fact, where Clinton’s margin of victory was bigger than President Obama’s in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama’s 60%. But California is the exception that proves the true genius of the Electoral College — which was designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections. In recent years, California has been turning into what amounts to a one-party state. Between 2008 and 2016, the number of Californian’s who registered as Democrats climbed by 1.1 million, while the number of registered Republicans dropped by almost 400,000. What’s more, many Republicans in the state had nobody to vote for in November. There were two Democrats — and zero Republicans — running to replace Sen. Barbara Boxer. There were no Republicans on the ballot for House seats in nine of California’s congressional districts. At the state level, six districts had no Republicans running for the state senate, and 16 districts had no Republicans running for state assembly seats. Plus, since Republicans knew Clinton was going to win the state — and its entire 55 electoral votes — casting a ballot for Trump was virtually meaningless, since no matter what her margin of victory, Clinton was getting all 55 votes. I think California needs to be divided into several states. For fairness.
Chef Jim Posted December 18, 2016 Posted December 18, 2016 Well Californias that didn't vote because there were no Republicans to vote for are idiots. With a couple dozen propositions on the ballot and with many to raise our taxes they had every reason to get out and vote.
Tiberius Posted December 18, 2016 Posted December 18, 2016 And California contributes two dollars for every one it takes from Federal government, whereas a Trump state like West Virginia TAKES two dollars from every one they contribute
Chef Jim Posted December 18, 2016 Posted December 18, 2016 And California contributes two dollars for every one it takes from Federal government, whereas a Trump state like West Virginia TAKES two dollars from every one they contribute Gee I wonder why that is?
Recommended Posts