3rdnlng Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Income disparity is a symptom of weak demand for jobs to a great extent. So what would Warren or any others of her ilk do about that? Reroute the wealthy through Sherwood Forest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Income disparity is a symptom of weak demand for jobs to a great extent. So what would Warren or any others of her ilk do about that? Flooding the market with cheap labor(Illegal immigrants) and driving down the price can't be helping either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 (edited) You are making it pretty obvious that you are not the smartest man in the room. You took exception to Hillary being called "Cankles" because it was so hurtful, but you now wish the same thing for potentially hundreds of other woman just because they might be related to someone here? You were widely mocked in this thread for your so called indignation. There was even a new thread started with the sole purpose of mocking you further. So, instead of just being thankful that you only got a little mauled, you return to poke the bear? I think you could also claim to be the only man in the room.Anyone here, including yourself, who mocked my objection to you making fun of a woman's body as part of a political conversation is not anyone who deserves any respect, so pardon me while I laugh at you. I'll go a step further. Should I meet any of you at future Bills games, and you have women with you, I promise to treat them in this way myself, as you've already given your consent, as you obviously find it appropriate. I'll be looking for you, very specifically, 3rd. Edited April 24, 2015 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Anyone here, including yourself, who mocked my objection to you making fun of a woman's body as part of a political conversation is not anyone who deserves any respect, so pardon me while I laugh at you. I'll go a step further. Should I meet any of you at future Bills games, and you have women with you, I promise to treat them in this way myself, as you've already given your consent, as you obviously find it appropriate. I'll be looking for you, very specifically, 3rd. And for some reason I have a feeling my wife would have little challenge kicking your ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 And for some reason I have a feeling my wife would have little challenge kicking your ass.I'll have no trouble pressing charges if she does. Though I'm confident it's a non-issue. Odd, though, this new reaction. I thought you felt this sort of treatment of women appropriate, Chef. You think your wife would object? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I'll have no trouble pressing charges if she does. Though I'm confident it's a non-issue. Odd, though, this new reaction. I thought you felt this sort of treatment of women appropriate, Chef. You think your wife would object? So you'd press charges against a 60 year old woman. I think I found TYTT's picture online Treatment of women?? Seriously? And would my wife object? She's laughing her ass off at you now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Anyone here, including yourself, who mocked my objection to you making fun of a woman's body as part of a political conversation is not anyone who deserves any respect, so pardon me while I laugh at you. I'll go a step further. Should I meet any of you at future Bills games, and you have women with you, I promise to treat them in this way myself, as you've already given your consent, as you obviously find it appropriate. I'll be looking for you, very specifically, 3rd. Just to clarify, are you saying you'll make cracks about her appearance behind her back with other guys, or are you of the belief that Hill-dog peruses these threads? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Just to clarify, are you saying you'll make cracks about her appearance behind her back with other guys, or are you of the belief that Hill-dog peruses these threads?I don't think there's much of a difference. If it's acceptable, then it's acceptable in front of and towards your wife. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I don't think there's much of a difference. If it's acceptable, then it's acceptable in front of and towards your wife. Ok I take it back. My wife won't kick your ass, though I'm pretty sure she could, she'd laugh her ass off at you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 So you'd press charges against a 60 year old woman. I think I found TYTT's picture online Treatment of women?? Seriously? And would my wife object? She's laughing her ass off at you now. I'm sure she is. Mine feels bad for her. And yes, if she attacked me, I'd absolutely press charges. Besides, why would she? I'd only be treating her in a way her husband feels appropriate. If she takes offense, her problem should be with you. Ok I take it back. My wife won't kick your ass, though I'm pretty sure she could, she'd laugh her ass off at you.You and your wife are comfortable with strangers insulting her body? Odd dynamic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I'm sure she is. Mine feels bad for her. And yes, if she attacked me, I'd absolutely press charges. Besides, why would she? I'd only be treating her in a way her husband feels appropriate. If she takes offense, her problem should be with you. What are you basing your comment on the fact that I feel treating women that way is appropriate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 What are you basing your comment on the fact that I feel treating women that way is appropriate? The fact that you've defended that sort of behavior in this this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 The fact that you've defended that sort of behavior in this this thread. Sorry, calling you a putz is not defending them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I don't think there's much of a difference. If it's acceptable, then it's acceptable in front of and towards your wife. There's a tremendous difference. It's a fairly obvious one too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 Sorry, calling you a putz is not defending them.I get it, man. You're a "go along to get along" kind of guy. A true middle of the pack animal. You don't want to rock the boat when folks who you largely agree with step out, because you value your place in the pack. So even when they behave in ways you find personally unacceptable, you won't say anything about it. Further, you'll join the pack in their idiocy, unwilling to say anything opposing, because you value your spot in the middle, and by God, you're going to maintain it. I could never live my life like that. I have no idea how others do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 So now Hillary's rollout has devo!ved into a discussion about who's wife can or can't beat up who. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 There's a tremendous difference. It's a fairly obvious one too.Only to the man not honest enough with the women in his life to show them who he really is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireChan Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 For your consideration. That's hilarious.Also, I'd still !@#$ all three of them. Is there a difference between this and that? Just curious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 (edited) For your consideration. Is there a difference between this and that? Just curious. Those women were talking about not being !@#$able anymore. They used that exact phrasing. It's what that conversation was about, which makes commentary on the topic reasonable. It was invited conversation. Edited April 24, 2015 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I get it, man. You're a "go along to get along" kind of guy. A true middle of the pack animal. You don't want to rock the boat when folks who you largely agree with step out, because you value your place in the pack. So even when they behave in ways you find personally unacceptable, you won't say anything about it. Further, you'll join the pack in their idiocy, unwilling to say anything opposing, because you value your spot in the middle, and by God, you're going to maintain it. I could never live my life like that. I have no idea how others do. So where have I ever "gone along" with the pack? So in your tiny, oh I'm sorry, your vast mind, if one does not speak against a group you're part of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts