Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Few here argue against paying the least amount of taxes as is legally possible. Unless of course it's the taxes that someone else has to pay - which is the stance that the libs and the progressively demented have.

Posted

Good for them. But only in America can one go from "flat broke" to up to $50mill in assets in 13 years. That is unless they were actually flat broke the lefet the WH in 2001. :rolleyes:

Posted

READY FOR HILLARY? ................................ Ready for blatant censorship attempts.

 

Which, happily, failed.

 

 

 

 

FASCIST IMPULSES:........... Hillary Clinton cannot let you hold a viewpoint about guns that is terrorizing the vast majority of Americans.

 

“Not only did Hillary completely turn her back on ‘balanc[ing] competing values’ and ‘more thoughtful conversation,’ she doesn’t want to allow the people on one side of the conversation even to believe what they believe. Those who care about gun rights and reject new gun regulations should be stopped from holding their viewpoint. Now, it isn’t possible to forcibly prevent people from holding a viewpoint. Our beliefs reside inside our head. And in our system of free speech rights, the government cannot censor the expression of a viewpoint. But the question is Hillary Clinton’s fitness for the highest office, and her statement reveals a grandiose and profoundly repressive mindset.”

 

 

 

You can see why her supporters wanted to ban the word “bossy.”

Posted

Hillary Clinton, who once said this, "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic..."

 

Now says this, "We cannot let a minority of people -- and that's what it is, it is a minority of people -- hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people."

 

Such a good little fascist.

Posted

JOLT: HILLARY BOOK FALLS OUT OF TOP 10 AMAZON AFTER ONE WEEK...

 

 

 

 

Peter Beinart: ‘Hillary Does Learn From Her Mistakes...After the Damage Is Done’

 

Hillary Clinton is not as complex as the universe, but she's Big and Important enough for Peter Beinart to call his 4,600-word National Journal piece on her hypothetical presidency "A Unified Theory of Hillary" and appear to mean it (mostly) seriously.

 

The article deals more with Hillary's personality than with her ideology (for what it's worth, Beinart classifies Hillary, along with Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, as moderate liberals). Beinart lauds her "passion for public policy," her "formidable analytical ability," and her "ingle-mindedness," but contends that last quality also is her "greatest flaw," pointing to how she suffered major setbacks on health-care reform and, eventually, the Iraq war because she did not, and perhaps could not, adjust to political realities.

 

Read More

 

 

 

 

WaPo: CNN coached audience to cheer for Hillary during town hall event

 

 

This … is CNN.

 

 

 

.

Posted

Cuz the only people who bought her book were journalists and fanboys. Normal people, not really interested in Hillary Clinton's book

I caught some of it flipping thru the channels. It was like watching an infomercial. Only thing missing was Wolf Blitzer channeling Billy Mayes

Posted

But wait! If you vote now... we'll double the offer! We'll throw in... Bill Clinton. All you have to do is pay for separate living and entertainment. So act now!

Posted (edited)

Hillary's campaign appears better organized this time (unofficial as it may be). By taking a stand on gun control she made herself appear more substantive and more of a leader, which one would expect given her background. That was missing 7 years ago when she changed her tune based on where her latest stop was. In debates she said nothing other than "we all hate George bush", thinking she was the front runner and the party would reunite behind that theme, while again avoiding taking any real position.

 

You right wingers had better watch out. She will be a much more formidable candidate this time and will easily beat a lunatic war monger like mccainiac, or stuffed shirt like romney. Better put a true conservative up there like rand Paul.

 

Otherwise writing is on the wall for a 3rd term for President Clinton.

Edited by Joe_the_6_pack
Posted

 

While no expert on this stuff, the one thing brutally clear about Obama is that he loves himself more than party or country, and the only thing that will make the final years of Obama opening borders and governing exclusively by executive order is the absolute Jerry Springer-like schitfest that will be Obama backing Warren instead of Hillary. When Obama starts releasing the dirt on Benghazi, etc., and Hillary starts releasing the dirt on everything else, you'll have front row seats to what will surely be the global equivalent of a full gatorman steel cage death match of ego versus ego.

 

Hillary's campaign appears better organized this time (unofficial as it may be). By taking a stand on gun control she made herself appear more substantive and more of a leader, which one would expect given her background. That was missing 7 years ago when she changed her tune based on where her latest stop was. In debates she said nothing other than "we all hate George bush", thinking she was the front runner and the party would reunite behind that theme, while again avoiding taking any real position.

 

You right wingers had better watch out. She will be a much more formidable candidate this time and will easily beat a lunatic war monger like mccainiac, or stuffed shirt like romney. Better put a true conservative up there like rand Paul.

 

Otherwise writing is on the wall for a 3rd term for President Clinton.

 

See above. Hillary may win, but Barry cares more for himself than her, and you can only imagine the things he will release on her. Mark these words.

Posted

 

 

While no expert on this stuff, the one thing brutally clear about Obama is that he loves himself more than party or country, and the only thing that will make the final years of Obama opening borders and governing exclusively by executive order is the absolute Jerry Springer-like schitfest that will be Obama backing Warren instead of Hillary. When Obama starts releasing the dirt on Benghazi, etc., and Hillary starts releasing the dirt on everything else, you'll have front row seats to what will surely be the global equivalent of a full gatorman steel cage death match of ego versus ego.

 

 

 

See above. Hillary may win, but Barry cares more for himself than her, and you can only imagine the things he will release on her. Mark these words.

Unless there's someone he feels a lot stronger about, I'm not seeing it. Don't forget bill did him a huge favor at the last convention delivering a strong speech when Obama needed a boost

Posted

Unless there's someone he feels a lot stronger about, I'm not seeing it. Don't forget bill did him a huge favor at the last convention delivering a strong speech when Obama needed a boost

 

Elizabeth Warren. She'll lose to HIllary, but Warren is cut from the Obama cloth; hard left progressive relying on affirmative action to get them places (she's got a little Cherokee in her, don'tcha know). Where you do you think Obama got the entire "you didn't build that" routine?

 

http://youtu.be/i-P-CoSNYaI

 

He will back Warren, and then you'll hear about everything Hillary did wrong about Benghazi while Hillary is forced to defend herself, and it will be on like Donkey Kong.

Posted

Elizabeth Warren. She'll lose to HIllary, but Warren is cut from the Obama cloth; hard left progressive relying on affirmative action to get them places (she's got a little Cherokee in her, don'tcha know). Where you do you think Obama got the entire "you didn't build that" routine?

 

http://youtu.be/i-P-CoSNYaI

 

He will back Warren, and then you'll hear about everything Hillary did wrong about Benghazi while Hillary is forced to defend herself, and it will be on like Donkey Kong.

 

If anything it will be an entertaining campaign as the royal families battle it out for supremacy.

Posted

Forward!

 

I am my honey bee's keeper!

 

President Barack Obama created a task force comprising various agencies to address the issue of rapidly diminishing honey bees and other pollinators.

 

Honey bees pollinate fruit, nuts and vegetables, and are crucial for the nation's food industry.

 

They have declined sharply in recent years due to various factors, including pesticides, mite infestations and loss of genetic diversity,the White House said Friday.

 

Said the president, "I saw that animated bee movie with Jerry Seinfield and Puddy and thought, 'Wow, if I don't do something, I'll never be able to raise money from the LGBT bee community. So this seemed like a good idea. No. Really. Not kidding. "

Posted

 

That headline's priceless.

 

"Obama announces plan to save honey bees."

 

No...Obama announces plan to create an inter-agency task force to write a position paper that makes recommendations for the causes of diminishing honey bees.

Posted (edited)

That headline's priceless.

 

"Obama announces plan to save honey bees."

 

No...Obama announces plan to create an inter-agency task force to write a position paper that makes recommendations for the causes of diminishing honey bees.

 

I have this vision of Valerie Jarrett tellling Obama "Look, we can't even announce the return of a 5-year POW without screwing it up. We've got two more years to announce things. Let's keep them simple from here on in, okay?"

Edited by LABillzFan
Posted

Elizabeth Warren. She'll lose to HIllary, but Warren is cut from the Obama cloth; hard left progressive relying on affirmative action to get them places (she's got a little Cherokee in her, don'tcha know). Where you do you think Obama got the entire "you didn't build that" routine?

 

http://youtu.be/i-P-CoSNYaI

 

He will back Warren, and then you'll hear about everything Hillary did wrong about Benghazi while Hillary is forced to defend herself, and it will be on like Donkey Kong.

 

Hope she runs. She is the kook of kooks.

×
×
  • Create New...