grinreaper Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Wait, I'm confused. Hillary is the real p***y grabber in this election? Per Gennifer Flowers Willie told her that Hillary has eaten more kitty than he has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Per Gennifer Flowers Willie told her that Hillary has eaten more kitty than he has. Well, I'll be. That Hillary is a hypocrite! Unfortunately, none of this makes a bit of difference. As soon as the media went fully into the bag (whenever that was) it became an inexorable march toward an authoritarian communist system. I'm hoping to be dead by the time that completely cements itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 But Trump can tweet it into a national headline. The headline won't be Hillary, the headline will be Trump's tweets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin Franklin Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Is that the way it works? Trump can just tweet it and it will be a headline? Because he's been tweeting about Hillary and the FBI and her campaign and altering her secure emails that she lied about under oath, and it hasn't made a national headline yet, so maybe you need think first, then post. Extra serving of jerkoff at your diner this morning? Trump tweets salacious stuff and it makes headlines. That's how it works. Substantive things don't draw eyeballs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Extra serving of jerkoff at your diner this morning? Trump tweets salacious stuff and it makes headlines. That's how it works. Substantive things don't draw eyeballs. "Substantive tweet" being an oxymoron, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 WASHINGTON POST: Hillary Clinton’s email problems just came roaring back. The FBI’s Own Investigation Summary Proves Hillary Clinton Broke The Law. FUNNY, IT WAS ALL GOOD WHEN HILLARY, FRANKEN, OBAMA AND EVEN BIDEN WANTED TO “TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK.” IT’S ONLY RACIST WHEN THE RIGHT SAYS IT. IT’S THE “DENSE PACK” SCANDAL: “It’s almost impossible to keep up with the evidence of Clinton misconduct, wrongdoing and illegality that continues to emerge. It is overwhelming.” HILLARY’S PUBLIC AND PRIVATE POSITIONS VERSUS TRUMP’S PRIVATE PARTS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Well, I'll be. That Hillary is a hypocrite! Unfortunately, none of this makes a bit of difference. As soon as the media went fully into the bag (whenever that was) it became an inexorable march toward an authoritarian communist system. I'm hoping to be dead by the time that completely cements itself. It won't be a communist system... you got the wrong "ism". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 "Substantive tweet" being an oxymoron, of course. u can express some #deepthoughts in and #compellingarguments 140 chars or less. #bringbackourpoliticaldiscourse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 It won't be a communist system... you got the wrong "ism". She's a commie. She's getting there like a fascist would do because she can't have an all out revolution but once she gets there it will be oligarchy/communism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 It won't be a communist system... you got the wrong "ism". Cronyism? Elitism? Opportunism? Divisivism? Dishonetsism? Narcissism? Lesbianism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Cronyism? Elitism? Opportunism? Divisivism? Dishonetsism? Narcissism? Lesbianism? Nepotism Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Cronyism? Elitism? Opportunism? Divisivism? Dishonetsism? Narcissism? Lesbianism? C'mon, you know that capitalism is the new communism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 C'mon, you know that capitalism is the new communism. 2016 is the new 1917? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 (edited) Well, I'll be. That Hillary is a hypocrite! Unfortunately, none of this makes a bit of difference. As soon as the media went fully into the bag (whenever that was) it became an inexorable march toward an authoritarian communist system. I'm hoping to be dead by the time that completely cements itself. Sometimes I wonder when the actual infiltration of this country began. I know FDR was a socialist but is that when it started? Or some time before that? Or did it grab hold after WW2 with Operation Paper Clip and the importation of German socialists and did they poison academia, media etc? It came from some external source just wondering who's responsible. Was it a plan put together because the US capitalist system outperformed the authoritarian systems by a long shot? Lots of questions but whatever the answer is it seems like we are witnessing the manifestation of it with low lifes like Obama and his anchor and Hillary actually becoming presidents. Edited October 19, 2016 by Dante Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 C'mon, you know that capitalism is the new communism. Ugh, you're right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Cronyism? Elitism? Opportunism? Divisivism? Dishonetsism? Narcissism? Lesbianism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I think any state that ends up Red after the voting should be nuked by Hilary once she gets in. This voting will show where the stupidity is in this country and I think we can rid ourselves of a ton of it just by watching who votes for Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maury Ballstein Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I think any state that ends up Red after the voting should be nuked by Hilary once she gets in. This voting will show where the stupidity is in this country and I think we can rid ourselves of a ton of it just by watching who votes for Trump. Are you a vegan actor ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I think any state that ends up Red after the voting should be nuked by Hilary once she gets in. This voting will show where the stupidity is in this country and I think we can rid ourselves of a ton of it just by watching who votes for Trump. How very tolerant of those different than yourselves. You should pursue a degree in Social Justice #StrongerTogetherExceptForPeopleWhoDisagreeWeShouldNukeThem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I think any state that ends up Red after the voting should be nuked by Hilary once she gets in. This voting will show where the stupidity is in this country and I think we can rid ourselves of a ton of it just by watching who votes for Trump. Is that another one of Podesta's emails? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts