Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

How do you justify taxing estates $1 let alone up to 65% of the estate value? On the other hand, what kind of fancy trusts would shield large estates from taxation meaning this proposal is no proposal at all?

 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-proposes-65-tax-on-largest-estates-1474559914

There are trusts to do this. Just ask Bill and Hillary for the number of their attorney. He'll tell you how.

Posted

 

 

Glad you understood it. Wasn't sure if maybe your senses were dulled.

 

Personally I don't find it funny when someone supports a cretin like her that flaunts her lawlessness in all of our faces and is an affront to everything upon which our country is based. With that said, I support your right to find it funny.

 

Thinly veiled support for The Emperor's New Clothes "news reporting" isn't my bag man. You dig?

 

 

It must be exhausting always viewing things in a us vs them sort of way. Some things are just funny, no matter what the source. Try to lighten up some.

Posted (edited)

 

"Scusa, io sono Marco Polo."

 

That, right there, is a quality post. :lol:

 

That commercial is right up there with, "Hey. Read the sign. Lemonade. Read it. Delicious."

Edited by LABillzFan
×
×
  • Create New...