B-Man Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 ASHE SCHOW: Ten takeaways from the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server. KLOBUCHAR: IT’S ‘SEXIST’ TO QUESTION HILLARY’S HEALTH. REMINDER: FBI Data Dump Shows Hillary Clinton Is Criminal And Clueless. FBI: Whereabouts of Clinton phones would ‘frequently become unknown.’ NOT EXACTLY BREAKING NEWS: Hillary Clinton is a big fat liar. “Leafing through the FBI’s 302 of its interview with Hillary Clinton, one might come away with the impression that she is a big fat idiot (to borrow the inelegant locution of Minnesota’s unfunniest former comedian). That impression would be justified based on the text of the interview notes, but it would be mistaken. Rather, Hillary Clinton is a big fat liar. Well, okay, we knew that. The seriousness and absurdity of the lies she has retailed have never been quite so apparent. You might say that her lies are the only thing transparent about her. How she is to be hoisted upward to the presidency of the United States is less a feat of political engineering than a triumph of the will.”
Ozymandius Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 My awareness took a leap during the Clockboy "scandal". It became apparent that, among virtually all my peer group, even questioning Ahmed's motivations was enough to have you branded a racist. From there to the Roosh (pickup artist) "scandal", where a tasteless "pro-rape" satire provokes death threats, yet from the same attackers not a single mention of actual rapes by migrants throughout the EU. I expect Hillary to do for relations between the sexes, what Obama did for race relations. The refugee crisis is beyond the pale. The Orlando killer story...immediately converted into a gun issue. Even if they stopped selling any guns TODAY, there are so many guns already in circulation, that any terrorist would have no trouble obtaining one (or would just make a bomb, or run people over with a car, or....). Transgender...BLM...no need to go on, really. I'm preaching to the choir. I have always been on "the Left", and throughout my life, it was the Right that I associated with censorship, and suppression of information. Now it is clear that "progressivism" is a wolf in sheep's clothing. I have always been dismissive of conspiracy theories, but the table is being set for globalization, and it appears there is no way around it. Welcome, brother. For many people I've met, their "red pill" moment was all the blatant dishonesty during the Trayvon/Zimmerman coverage. Everyone has their red pill moment, and it seems Clockboy did it for you. I'm glad you're beginning to awaken. Our enemies want to end the white race.
B-Man Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 Back to Hillary Hillary Clinton’s Mind-Boggling FBI Interview – What Was Cheryl Mills Doing There? by Andrew C McCarthy As already noted, the FBI-302 report of the interview of Hillary Clinton, along with the other notes of investigation released today, make for mind boggling reading. Most bracing is the fact that Mrs. Clinton had her server wiped clean sometime between March 25 and 31, 2015, only three weeks after the New York Times on March 3 broke the story of the server system’s existence. David notes that, at the same time the Democrats’ Janus-faced presidential nominee was outwardly taking the position that she “want[ed] the public to see my email,” she was having her minions frantically purge her emails behind the scenes. I’d add that this was five months before she feigned ignorance when Fox News’s Ed Henry pressed her on whether she’d “tried to wipe the entire server … so there could be no email – no personal, no official.” Henry finally asked, “Did you wipe the server?” Famously, Clinton scoffed, “Like with a cloth or something?” But we now know, as the FBI notes recount, she had the server purged with a sophisticated software program, BleachBit, which eventually made it extraordinarily difficult for the FBI to recover her emails, several thousand of which were successfully destroyed. And remember: We’ve just learned that 30 emails related to Benghazi were on the server Clinton purged – emails that she never turned over to the State Department despite claiming repeatedly that she’d surrendered all of her government-related emails. I would thus note that the March 2015 purge right after public revelation of the server’s existence occurred long after Mrs. Clinton was well aware of several official government investigations of the Benghazi massacre – one by the State Department, several by Congress, and a judicial proceeding involving the one defendant who has been indicted for the terrorist attack. {snip} Mind you, Mrs. Clinton was not just secretary of state for four years. She was a United States senator for eight years, during nearly all of which she was assigned to the Senate Armed Services Committee (and such Armed Services components as the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities). Reviewing classified information, including highly sensitive national defense secrets, is a routine part of that committee’s work. Clinton also claimed that she “did not pay attention to the ‘level’ of classified information.” The interview notes do not explain how the FBI squared this with, for example, (a) Clinton’s acknowledgement that top-secret “special access program” (SAP) information was delivered to her by paper in her office and she knew it was supposed to be handled with extraordinary care; and (b) Clinton’s admission that she made use of her Original Classification Authority at times (though she couldn’t say how often). That means she had to have assigned to some information the very classification levels with which she portrays herself as scarcely familiar. We also learn in the FBI documents not only that Mrs. Clinton frequently lost her Blackberry devices, but that the FBI failed to account for some thirteen of them, most if not all of which she used while transmitting the over 2,000 classified emails the FBI identified. Clinton aides told the FBI that her devices – loaded with stored emails – would at times disappear and their whereabouts would become unknown. Interestingly, in the notes of Mrs. Clinton’s interview, the FBI says she told them that her BlackBerry devices would occasionally “malfunction”; when this happened, “[h]er aides would assist in obtaining a new BlackBerry.” I have not yet found indications that the FBI asked her about lost rather than malfunctioning devices. We do learn, though, that on February 9, 2016, the Justice Department asked Clinton’s lawyers to turn over all 13 mobile devices that the FBI identified as having potentially transmitted emails. Almost two weeks later, on February 22, the lawyers told the FBI “they were unable to locate any of these devices.” As a result, the notes recount, “the FBI was unable to acquire or forensically examine any of these 13 mobile devices.” Finally, something else about those lawyers. I nearly fell out of my chair upon reading the very first paragraph of the notes of Clinton’s interview, which identifies the lawyers for Clinton who were permitted to be present for the interview. Among them is Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s longtime confidant and chief-of-staff at the State Department. Readers may recall that I suggested back in May that “the fix” was in in the investigation of the Clinton emails. The reason was that the Justice Department was allowing Cheryl Mills – a witness, if not a subject, of the investigation – to invoke attorney-client privilege on behalf of Mrs. Clinton in order to thwart the FBI’s attempt to inquire into the procedure used to produce Clinton’s emails to the State Department. Mills was a participant in that procedure – and it is the procedure in which, we now know, well over 30,000 emails were attempted to be destroyed, including several thousand that contained government-related business. When she worked for Clinton at State, Mills was not acting in the capacity of a lawyer – not for then-Secretary Clinton and not for the State Department. Moreover, as Clinton’s chief-of-staff, Mills was intimately involved in issues related to Clinton’s private email set up, the discussions about getting her a secure BlackBerry similar to President Obama’s, and questions that were raised (including in FOIA requests) about Clinton’s communications. That is to say, Mills was an actor in the facts that were under criminal investigation by the FBI. Put aside that she was not Mrs. Clinton’s lawyer while working for the State Department; as I explained in the May column, Mills, after leaving the State Department, was barred by ethical rules from acting as Mrs. Clinton’s lawyer “in connection with a matter in which the lawyer participated personally and substantially as a public officer or employee.” There is no way Mills should have been permitted to participate as a lawyer in the process of producing Clinton’s emails to the State Department nearly two years after they’d both left. I thought it was astonishing that the Justice Department indulged her attorney-client privilege claim, which frustrated the FBI’s ability to question her on a key aspect of the investigation. But it is simply unbelievable to find her turning up at Mrs. Clinton’s interview – participating in the capacity of a lawyer under circumstances where Clinton was being investigated over matters in which Mills participated as a non-lawyer government official. According to the FBI’s report, Mrs. Clinton had four other attorneys (one whose name is deleted from the report for some reason) representing her at the interview. She clearly did not need another lawyer. And it is Criminal Investigations 101 that law enforcement never interviews witnesses together – the point is to learn the truth, not provide witnesses/suspects with an opportunity to keep their story straight, which undermines the search for truth. Why on earth was Cheryl Mills permitted to sit in on Hillary Clinton’s FBI interview?Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/439676/clintons-fbi-interview-what-was-cheryl-mills-doing-there
IDBillzFan Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 Our enemies want to end the white race. Unlike you alt-rights who want to end all races except the superior skin-headed whites!
Deranged Rhino Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 All out socialism. What industry do you think she will order the government to take over first? I am thinking Facebook and Apple....actually might be Taco Trucks Facebook and (less so) Apple are already heavily intertwined with the DoD and intelligence apparatus in the US. No need for a government take over there.
Prickly Pete Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 Unlike you alt-rights who want to end all races except the superior skin-headed whites! Absurd. There are extremists at the far end of any movement (even Black, Asian, and Latino [gasp!]).
Deranged Rhino Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 Absurd. There are extremists at the far end of any movement (even Black, Asian, and Latino [gasp!]). Are you an alt-right guy?
Magox Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 His attacks are definitely on Fox. They're the only network carrying his water. And again, as flawed as he is, LIAR is worse. All he's done is say things. She's actually done things that have been detrimental to our country. What's troubling to me is that people don't realize that/need to hear things through the media. You don't see that he's an even bigger fat liar than Hillary? You don't see that?
Prickly Pete Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 You don't see that he's an even bigger fat liar than Hillary? You don't see that? No, I don't.
Deranged Rhino Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 No, I don't. Are you an alt-right guy?
/dev/null Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 You don't see that he's an even bigger fat liar than Hillary? You don't see that? No, I don't. Hiliary is a turd with corn. Trump is a turd with peanuts Some people prefer corn and others prefer peanuts. But both are still a turd
Prickly Pete Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 Are you an alt-right guy? I've been aware of it for years, but I wouldn't describe myself as alt-right. I consider a variety of perspectives, and reach my own conclusions.
IDBillzFan Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 There are extremists at the far end of any movement Yes, and these extremists are skinheads who want to do away with anyone who isn't white.
Prickly Pete Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 (edited) Yes, and these extremists are skinheads who want to do away with anyone who isn't white. Nah. I can't speak for other people, but I don't feel that way, and I don't believe that the vast majority of anti-Hillaryites/TrumpHasToWin-ers feel that way. You have obviously dug yourself in on this. There are just as extreme, nutty Progressives supporting Hillary. The "toxic masculinity" crowd. Many in the BLM movement. The guys waving Mexican flags at anti-Trump protests. Virtually all the violence has come from the anti-Trump faction...amirite? I think an old Vet guy in his 70's socked a young black woman in the head, when she was being extremely obnoxious at a Trump rally...that's about it. When you have footage of someone being chased by Trump supporters like this, get back to me... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI-1xXoC2Wk Edited September 3, 2016 by HoF Watkins
B-Man Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 (edited) CLINTON LOSING SUPPORT AMONG HISPANICS Will Donald Trump’s pivot on immigration and his trip to Mexico change the way Hispanic voters view him? I don’t know. But quite apart from anything Trump is doing, Hispanics view Hillary Clinton less favorably than they did earlier this year. According to the Washington Post, a new Latino Decisions poll found that 70 percent of registered Hispanic voters say they will definitely vote for Clinton or were leaning towards doing so. That’s not a bad number, but it’s down 6 points from April. Moreover, the same survey found that only 55 percent of Hispanics view Clinton favorably. That’s down from 71 percent in April. More at the link: Edited September 3, 2016 by B-Man
Ozymandius Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 Unlike you alt-rights who want to end all races except the superior skin-headed whites! lol, even the worst media liars haven't concluded that about the alt-right. I can see why you would exaggerate. The alt-right is going to end cuckservatism and you feel threatened. If we WERE going to genocide anyone, it would probably be cucked whites. We need to rid ourselves of the cuck gene. Everyone else, we can just deport humanely.
DC Tom Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 lol, even the worst media liars haven't concluded that about the alt-right. I can see why you would exaggerate. The alt-right is going to end cuckservatism and you feel threatened. If we WERE going to genocide anyone, it would probably be cucked whites. We need to rid ourselves of the cuck gene. Everyone else, we can just deport humanely. We could, say, invade Mexico, designate northern Mexico a federal protectorate, and deport all the illegal immigrants there.
Doc Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 You don't see that he's an even bigger fat liar than Hillary? You don't see that? Liar? He is. Bigger liar than LIAR? Nope.
/dev/null Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 Liar? He is. Bigger liar than LIAR? Nope. Both are epic liars but in Hiliarys defense (never thought I'd say that ) she may not know some of her lies are lies considering how insulated she is from the real world
B-Man Posted September 3, 2016 Posted September 3, 2016 Both are epic liars but in Hiliarys defense (never thought I'd say that ) she may not know some of her lies are lies considering how insulated she is from the real world TAMARA KEEL ON HILLARY’S LATEST: This is about as plausible as “the dog ate my homework”. She claimed she didn’t know that the “c” meant “confidential”, that nobody told her that she should retain work emails as they are part of the public record. Further in the article, she throws her staff under the bus, in effect claiming that underlings and minions told the dog to eat her homework. That’s some Grade A leadership there, right? Makes you wanna sign right up for that outfit, no? Further, I have an Ivy League lawyer, wife of a former governor and president, who lived in the White House for eight damned years, then went on to be a senator and Secretary of State telling me she didn’t know about classified email and that work-related documents needed to be saved as part of the public record? Look, I don’t mind you bullshitting me a little bit, Hillary, but don’t you ever lie to me like I’m Montel Williams. Oops.
Recommended Posts