Jump to content

Hillary's Campaign Kickoff


Recommended Posts

"Sure, I knew it was a felony, but Colin Powell told me to do it!!"

 

 

Hillary Clinton Lied About Her Email Server… Again

http://www.redstate.com/kylefoley/2016/08/19/hillary-clinton-lied-email-server.../

 

In her latest lie, she claimed that former Secretary of State General Colin Powell advised her to use a private email server at a dinner conversation.

The journalist Joe Conason first reported the conversation between Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Powell in his coming book about Bill Clinton’s post-presidency, “Man of the World: The Further Endeavors of Bill Clinton,” which The Times received an advanced copy of.

Mr. Conason describes a conversation in the early months of Mrs. Clinton’s tenure at the State Department at a small dinner party hosted by Madeleine Albright, another former secretary of state, at her home in Washington. Henry Kissinger and Condoleezza Rice also attended.

“Toward the end of the evening, over dessert, Albright asked all of the former secretaries to offer one salient bit of counsel to the nation’s next top diplomat,” Mr. Conason writes. “Powell told her to use her own email, as he had done, except for classified communications, which he had sent and received via a State Department computer.”

Mr. Conason continued, “Saying that his use of personal email had been transformative for the department,” Mr. Powell “thus confirmed a decision she had made months earlier — to keep her personal account and use it for most messages.”

 

 

 

The problem? Powell has no recollection of that conversation. He did, however, send an email memo to Clinton describing his use of a personal email for unclassified email messages, which he explained in a statement from his office given to MSNBC.

 

“General Powell has no recollection of the dinner conversation. He did write former Secretary Clinton an email memo describing his use of his personal AOL email account for unclassified messages and how it vastly improved communications within the State Department. At the time, there was no equivalent system within the department. He used a secure state computer on his desk to manage classified information. The general no longer has the email he sent to former Secretary Clinton.”

 

 

 

Powell made it abundantly clear that his email account was never used for anything other than personal use, and he made sure to only use his secured state computer at his desk when working with classified information. Clinton, on the other hand, used her private email account to send classified information, a crime for which the FBI and Department of Justice have refused to hold her accountable.

 

Clinton will inevitably continue to spin her use of a private server as acceptable, claiming that she did nothing wrong, but that is simply not the case. Clinton broke the law, and no amount of lying or corruption will ever change that.

 

 

 

B_39gePBvh2IdOaWP_ijvAvepi1xkZ1pWCIASQqp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clinton arrives in Nantucket for a weekend in fundraising

CqULFepXYAAhdt3.jpg

 

 

She looks real steady there.....doesn't she ?

 

 

To be fair, the hospitals in Nantucket are far better than the flooded ones in Louisiana.

 

 

 

 

 

 

WELL, WE KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT ONE: What would media say about naked Hillary statues?

 

In a country once rocked for two weeks by the inadvertent appearance of Janet Jackson’s nipple at the Super Bowl, media condemnation of the objectively vulgar statue suddenly proved non-existent. The mood in the national press was rather jubilant and lauding.

 

The tone of the media wouldn’t concern if bias in its coverage of the presidential election and cultural affairs in America was not already so out of control.

 

Picture, if you will, a naked statue representation of Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, erected (erm…) by cover of night in Times Square and on the boardwalks of Los Angeles, the sculptor’s artistic license given free reign. Imagine the sagging breasts, the flabby tum tum, the far-less-than-pert buttocks, and for the coup de grace, creative depictions of the male genitalia. Would the sculptor go very short, or very long?

 

It is impossible to quantify the rage that our media would unleash on the nation and heap upon sexist and racist, so-called artists. See, there is at this point, no irony in, no shame from, and no end to, the parade of contradictions that mainstream media will foist on its viewers and readers.

 

When it comes to Trump, the same rules simply do not apply. He cannot speak for himself; the media will speak for him. He cannot be entitled to dignity; the media will strip it from him however they can. And it’s not because he’s Trump. It’s not because he angered the fans of Univision. It’s because he’s Republican. If it were Jeb Bush, the statue in Times Square would have been of Jeb Bush; the media criticism all the same.

 

Anyone who’s honest will admit that the media has long favored liberals, but the bias has been worse than ever in this election season. Bashing a political figure’s looks, private lives, and even personally attacking their family members is totally fair game — as long as that political figure is a conservative.

 

Just look at the coverage on Melania Trump’s white dress at the RNC. Elizabeth Wellington, a fashion writer at the Philadelphia Inquirer, suggested that Trump’s dress symbolized racism. “To many, that outfit could be another reminder that in the GOP, white is always right,” she wrote.

 

Vanessa Friedman of The New York Times wrote, “Ms. Trump’s choice of a white dress…sent all sorts of interesting subliminal signals.” Just a week later, Wellington gushed over Hillary Clinton’s all-white DNC outfit. “White is a hue that’s both soft and strong.

But it was appropriate: Her acceptance speech was a coming out of sorts. Clinton’s white pantsuit is telling us she has arrived. This is surreal. A dream come true….”

 

What would the reaction be if a mainstream journalist made even the slightest negative comment about Clinton’s or Michelle Obama’s attire at the DNC? What if they were called “too old looking,” “too fat,” “too weak”? We all know the answer to this question.

 

 

 

Think of them as Democratic operatives with bylines and you won’t go far wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Clinton arrives in Nantucket for a weekend in fundraising

CqULFepXYAAhdt3.jpg

She looks real steady there.....doesn't she ?

 

 

She literally looks like she's trying to pass a DUI test.

 

My curiosity about her health is growing. I think the pillow stuff is silly, but this narrative about her poor health is taking some legs of its own. Her doctor released a report last week stating she is in excellent health, but given Hillary's inability to speak truth, does anyone actually believe her physician?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

She literally looks like she's trying to pass a DUI test.

 

My curiosity about her health is growing. I think the pillow stuff is silly, but this narrative about her poor health is taking some legs of its own. Her doctor released a report last week stating she is in excellent health, but given Hillary's inability to speak truth, does anyone actually believe her physician?

Excellent health means she has a pulse and is qualified to be POTUS. Never mind she's overweight, can't operate an automobile, can get up a flight of stairs, can't make it through a debate on her feet and has a 3 second reaction time to an incoming shoe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

She literally looks like she's trying to pass a DUI test.

 

My curiosity about her health is growing. I think the pillow stuff is silly, but this narrative about her poor health is taking some legs of its own. Her doctor released a report last week stating she is in excellent health, but given Hillary's inability to speak truth, does anyone actually believe her physician?

 

It doesn't matter. It's her destiny to be president.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AMERICANS ARE ABOUT TO GET THE FIRST LANDSLIDE PRESIDENT WE DON’T WANT, Kyle Smith writes in the New York Post:

We’ve got a presidential campaign that stars one of the most polarizing, divisive and talked-about figures in American life, an international celebrity and lightning rod for all sociopolitical topics going back a quarter of a century.

 

And she’s become a bystander in this race.

 

On Thursday, after the usual barrage and tumult of nuttier-than-a-Skippy-factory stories about the Donald Trump campaign, Hillary Clinton didn’t show up until page A15 of that day’s edition of The New York Times, in a story in which she practically begged America, “Hey! Over here! I’m in this thing too!”

 

It turns out Clinton has some sort of tax proposal. (She wants to raise them.) Nobody cares. It won’t pass. Nothing she says matters.

 

 

 

 

The leftwing reboot of the Supreme Court she’ll perform over the next four to eight years will. Good and hard, as Mencken would say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

AMERICANS ARE ABOUT TO GET THE FIRST LANDSLIDE PRESIDENT WE DON’T WANT, Kyle Smith writes in the New York Post:

The leftwing reboot of the Supreme Court she’ll perform over the next four to eight years will. Good and hard, as Mencken would say.

 

 

It's almost like some folks have been calling this for going on two years now...

 

The fix has been in for years.

 

$6B meh that's chump change for Space Command

 

:lol: :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

AMERICANS ARE ABOUT TO GET THE FIRST LANDSLIDE PRESIDENT WE DON’T WANT, Kyle Smith writes in the New York Post:

We’ve got a presidential campaign that stars one of the most polarizing, divisive and talked-about figures in American life, an international celebrity and lightning rod for all sociopolitical topics going back a quarter of a century.

 

And she’s become a bystander in this race.

 

On Thursday, after the usual barrage and tumult of nuttier-than-a-Skippy-factory stories about the Donald Trump campaign, Hillary Clinton didn’t show up until page A15 of that day’s edition of The New York Times, in a story in which she practically begged America, “Hey! Over here! I’m in this thing too!”

 

It turns out Clinton has some sort of tax proposal. (She wants to raise them.) Nobody cares. It won’t pass. Nothing she says matters.

 

 

 

 

The leftwing reboot of the Supreme Court she’ll perform over the next four to eight years will. Good and hard, as Mencken would say.

 

 

 

On Thursday, after the usual barrage and tumult of nuttier-than-a-Skippy-factory stories about the Donald Trump campaign,

 

 

 

I don't dispute that Trump is crazy but peanuts are legumes Mr. Moron Reporter. "nuttier than a Skippy factory" might not be nutty at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colin Powell Says Hillary Clinton's 'People Have Been Trying to Pin' Email Scandal on Him

colin-powell-435.jpghttp://www.people.com/article/colin-powell-hillary-clinton-pinning-email-scandal-on-him

 

 

 

 

Huma Abedin worked at a radical Muslim journal for a dozen years

http://nypost.com/2016/08/21/huma-abedin-worked-at-a-radical-muslim-journal-for-10-years/

abedin-main.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=6

 

 

If a Republican ever so much as flipped through this journal in a library, it'd be a front-page NYT story

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colin Powell Says Hillary Clinton's 'People Have Been Trying to Pin' Email Scandal on Him

colin-powell-435.jpghttp://www.people.com/article/colin-powell-hillary-clinton-pinning-email-scandal-on-him

 

 

 

 

 

Huma Abedin worked at a radical Muslim journal for a dozen years

http://nypost.com/2016/08/21/huma-abedin-worked-at-a-radical-muslim-journal-for-10-years/

abedin-main.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=6

 

 

If a Republican ever so much as flipped through this journal in a library, it'd be a front-page NYT story

Classic honey trap maneuver?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...