Hillary's Campaign Kickoff

[Chef Jim]

 

When you reflect on it, one is surprised that "White House" hasn't been called coded racism. Or even overt racism...a black man, and we force him to live in a specific place, and then insult him by calling where he lives "white?"

 

That's almost as bad as serving him wine from vineyards that used to be slave-owning farms.

 

I was talking with a black guy years ago who said the word white is racist. He said white always represents good. Wedding dresses, the good guy wear's a white hat whereas black has always represented bad. You know, that bad guy always wears a black hat.

[DC Tom]

 

I was talking with a black guy years ago who said the word white is racist. He said white always represents good. Wedding dresses, the good guy wear's a white hat whereas black has always represented bad. You know, that bad guy always wears a black hat.

 

If he's a REALLY bad guy, he's wearing a black man on his head...

[Alaska Darin]

 

If he's a REALLY bad guy, he's wearing a black man on his head...

[KD in CA]

 

I was talking with a black guy years ago who said the word white is racist. He said white always represents good. Wedding dresses, the good guy wear's a white hat whereas black has always represented bad. You know, that bad guy always wears a black hat.

 

I worked with a black guy once who said only white people were capable of racism. By definition black people couldn't racist.

[OCinBuffalo]

 

I was talking with a black guy years ago who said the word white is racist. He said white always represents good. Wedding dresses, the good guy wear's a white hat whereas black has always represented bad. You know, that bad guy always wears a black hat.

Tell him to go to Japan, come back, and then STFU.

 

Next tell him to go to England, and ask anyone there about the Black Prince, and if he is a "good guy" for them. The people who got thrown out of their educational system at 15 for being C students....even they know the Black Prince.

 

Tell him to come back, and then, once again tell him to STFU.

 

Next, tell him that history, and familiarity with the world's cultures, are not his enemies. His enemy is his own ignorance. Then, tell him I've used the Black Prince, and the rest of what is below, in many similar discussions with the same idiotic premise, on many a black person, they've always learned something they didn't know, and they usually thank me. (I love using the Black Prince for this. It's so perfect!)

 

Next, tell him anthropology is not his enemy, so he should go to Africa/Asia, and ask all these dark skinned people the following: do they paint themselves white because their society has sensitized them to black == bad? Or, do they do it for another reason, and will he have to get his anthropologist on, to determine why?

 

When he returns from that trip, tell him to take a damn bath, and then STFU.

 

Tell him that cultural psychology is not his enemy, and 2.8 million years of human existence of living with the notion that darkness/blackness, being associated with night, and all the bad it brings(like being most vulnerable to attack from beast and man, since forever), and that white, light, the sun, and all the good it does(like grow food, and keep you from tripping on stuff) being associated with good...shouldn't be surprising to anyone. Especially not with 2.8 million years of this schit. 2.8? Yeah...right here, with a climate change kicker!

 

Then ask, in our current age of the "Meanwhile, in Japan..." meme(and I'm telling you now: NSFW), everywhere, is it any surprise that the Japanese have it backwards?

 

Finally tell him that logic/reason/history/facts/true intellectual rigor are worthy pursuits.

 

While listening to the idiocy and lack of rigor inherent to the "identity studies" majors, which are the source of his idioitc premise, and Al Sharpton, will simply make him stupid.

Edited March 29, 2015 by OCinBuffalo

[B-Man]

Washington Post tears into candidates ‘who mock the law,’ but GUESS who they missed ?

 

 

http://wapo.st/1GjhJYx

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Doc]

The comment section takes them to task.

[B-Man]

As we get ready for the assumed launch of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign on Sunday, here’s GOP consultant Rick Wilson with some well needed truthiness. Hillary is just not a very good candidate:

 

 

"The MSNBC panel this morning on Hillary's rollout is a perfect case study. All about the *process* of Hillary's rollout, without the vital questions."

 

 

Do you really want an American President who is so scared of the media she is forced to live behind a shield wall of handlers at all times?

 

 

And I use the word "scared" deliberately. It's not just contempt. It's fear. She wants a slow, insulated campaign at her pace.

 

 

She wakes up every morning knowing that if her "asked-and-answered" strategy goes wrong, there are bad days ahead.

 

 

 

I've seen this in focus groups in both 2000 senatorial, and 2008 presidential. Ask voters what Hillary Clinton stands for. Then wait. ............"Um. Um. Um."..............You MIGHT get "pro-woman"...MAYBE

 

 

 

 

The truth is she's a bad candidate who wants to run as the de facto incumbent with a Rose Garden strategy in an age of social media.

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

[B-Man]

And the beat goes on...............

 

 

Clinton campaign considering pooling press coverage at small Iowa events on launch.

 

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/can-hillary-clinton-run-intimate-campaign …

 

 

Because what says humble, populist, retail Iowa caucus campaigning more than "pool coverage."........................lol

 

 

 

.

[Dante]

No conflict of interest here. Not at all. What a criminal. She should be in jail not running for president.

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/09/report-hillary-supported-trade-deal-after-oil-magnate-pledged-100-million-to-family-foundation/

 

Damn she looks like some Chinese communist leader in that outfit.

Edited April 10, 2015 by Dante

[DC Tom]

No conflict of interest here. Not at all. What a criminal. She should be in jail not running for president.

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/09/report-hillary-supported-trade-deal-after-oil-magnate-pledged-100-million-to-family-foundation/

 

Damn she looks like some Chinese communist leader in that outfit.

 

I didn't know they made potato sacks in emerald green.

[Dante]

 

I didn't know they made potato sacks in emerald green.

Probably paid 3 grand for that potato sack. Unless she did some favor and got it for free.

[IDBillzFan]

I didn't know they made potato sacks in emerald green.

 

One of the better "I Love Lucy" episodes...Ricky and Fred convince Lucy and Ethel that potato sacks are all the rage in the fashion industry and they must have them.

 

Meanwhile, I look forward to American electing the first mumu president.

[B-Man]

A little birdie can’t help Hill hide from truth

By:Adriana Cohen http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/columnists/adriana_cohen/2015/04/adriana_cohen_a_little_birdie_can_t_help_hill_hide

 

FTA:

Hillary Clinton will announce she’s running for president tomorrow — on Twitter and social media. She’s also sending out the announcement in an email. Be ready to hit the delete button.

 

{snip}

 

Perhaps this is the reason for Hillary’s scripted roll-out on social media. She can evade questions and, thereby, accountability.

 

By operating behind a desktop, she can have PR experts tweet her announcement and then go hide. She doesn’t have to answer any real questions in a Town Hall setting or press conference.

 

Here’s a few questions I’d like to ask:

 

• How can you accept millions from Middle Eastern countries who oppress and abuse women and girls?

 

• If you had nothing to hide in your emails, why not hand them all over to an independent third party?

 

• How can you say you were dead broke when leaving the White House when your family net worth is in the millions?

 

• How can you speak to rising tuition costs when you requested colleges and universities pay you $300,000 for a speech?

 

 

 

You see, it’s much easier to tweet a presidential run than face real questions. Guess that was the whole point

 

[Nanker]

One of the better "I Love Lucy" episodes...Ricky and Fred convince Lucy and Ethel that potato sacks are all the rage in the fashion industry and they must have them.

 

Meanwhile, I look forward to American electing the first mumu president.

http://youtu.be/xB9_3ctPDb0

 

full episode: https://youtu.be/zB8YRcGqofw

Edited April 11, 2015 by Nanker

[B-Man]

Hillary Clinton’s Truman Show Campaign

If she can’t handle a kickoff speech, how could she handle the presidency?

In the catalogue of stock political events, a campaign launch may be as easy as it gets. Sure, first impressions are important. But you find a setting that is historically or personally significant, you hang a few American flags, you gather a crowd of cheering supporters, you talk about America’s great promise, you march out to an upbeat tune. The bar is low. It’s hard to screw up a campaign launch.

But Hillary Clinton might be about to do it. According to the Guardian, Clinton plans to announce her presidential campaign at noon on Sunday, en route to Iowa, “on Twitter . . . followed by a video and email announcement.” Getting to Iowa is suddenly so urgent that she has to make her announcement from a plane 30,000 feet over St. Louis? Hardly.

In 2008, Clinton announced via video, too — a 90-second clip in which she declared, “I’m not just starting a campaign. I’m starting a conversation — with you, with America.” Because nothing says “dialogue” like a pre-recorded video with only one person in the room. Eight years later, the Clinton team is doing the same thing. Why? Because for someone who has spent her life in public, Hillary Clinton is very bad in public. And her team knows it.

Consider the last month, which has given the uninitiated a rare but crucial glimpse behind the curtain into ClintonWorld®. After delaying appearing publicly to address revelations that, as secretary of state, she had violated State Department regulations and federal law, and endangered national security, by routing her work e-mails through a private server, Clinton held the worst press conference since tennis star Rafael Nadal spent an entire post-match press appearance moaning. Her laughable excuse (“convenience”) was immediately debunked (by her own prior statements), and even softball questions left her visibly tetchy.

It was a timely reminder that Hillary Clinton the Person, the actual flesh-and-blood human being, is wildly unappealing. She is at best awkward and boring; she is at worst cold and petulant and endowed with all the public graces of a product of Disney’s animatronics lab. Of course she seems fake. You can’t spend years appealing to the mean of a Frank Luntz focus group and still cast yourself as Joan of Arc.

{snip}

But presidents are not avatars (as the current president, and many of his erstwhile adorers, have learned). They are real people who must react in real time to real events. They have to decide unhesitatingly what to do when riots break out in a Missouri suburb, or when Vladimir Putin seizes a warm-water port, or when Islamic militants overrun an American embassy overseas. You can’t pre-record that 3 a.m. phone call. Why should a voter have confidence in Clinton’s ability to handle a crisis, when the Clinton team has no confidence that she can handle a live speech?

For decades, Hillary Clinton has had her entire life scripted. She has existed in a world insulated by handlers and managers and “her people,” all of whom are employed for the overarching purpose of mediating her engagement with the calamitous world “out there.” Yet every time the bubble is pricked, and we no longer have to see Hillary Clinton through limousine glass darkly, we rediscover her vices — her obsessive secretiveness, her arrogance, her shrewish treatment even of those closest to her — and the unmistakable fact that she is simply not equipped to deal with the world unmediated.

Hillary Clinton wants to run a Truman Show campaign. But what the last six years have made incontrovertibly clear is that you can’t run a Truman Show presidency.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/416773/hillary-clintons-truman-show-campaign-ian-tuttle

.

 

[Nanker]

A little birdie can’t help Hill hide from truth

By:Adriana Cohen http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/columnists/adriana_cohen/2015/04/adriana_cohen_a_little_birdie_can_t_help_hill_hide

 

FTA:

Hillary Clinton will announce she’s running for president tomorrow — on Twitter and social media. She’s also sending out the announcement in an email. Be ready to hit the delete button.

 

{snip}

 

Perhaps this is the reason for Hillary’s scripted roll-out on social media. She can evade questions and, thereby, accountability.

 

By operating behind a desktop, she can have PR experts tweet her announcement and then go hide. She doesn’t have to answer any real questions in a Town Hall setting or press conference.

 

Here’s a few questions I’d like to ask:

 

• How can you accept millions from Middle Eastern countries who oppress and abuse women and girls?

 

• If you had nothing to hide in your emails, why not hand them all over to an independent third party?

 

• How can you say you were dead broke when leaving the White House when your family net worth is in the millions?

 

• How can you speak to rising tuition costs when you requested colleges and universities pay you $300,000 for a speech?

 

 

 

You see, it’s much easier to tweet a presidential run than face real questions. Guess that was the whole point

 

 

Those might be good for starters, but everyone will be queued up and on the edge of their seat when MTV does an interview with him and some kallage studnt in the audience asks THE BIG QUESTION: Hillary - Thongs or Panties?

[reddogblitz]

Here’s a few questions I’d like to ask:

 

• How can you accept millions from Middle Eastern countries who oppress and abuse women and girls?

 

• If you had nothing to hide in your emails, why not hand them all over to an independent third party?

 

• How can you say you were dead broke when leaving the White House when your family net worth is in the millions?

 

• How can you speak to rising tuition costs when you requested colleges and universities pay you $300,000 for a speech?

 

Here's what I'd ask:

 

What exactly do you mean when you say you have taken "responsibility" for your Iraq War vote? Exactly how have you taken "responsibility"?

 

I would think taking responsibility would include things like volunteering at a VA Hospital to help the maimed and psychologically damaged veterans. Maybe decide to never hold elected office again since you screwed the pooch so bad on this one. Reach out to families who have lost a loved ones by paying for their funeral or other outstanding costs from being injured/killed in your war.

[meazza]

Those might be good for starters, but everyone will be queued up and on the edge of their seat when MTV does an interview with him and some kallage studnt in the audience asks THE BIG QUESTION: Hillary - Thongs or Panties?

 

I think she goes commando.

 

Apologies in advance for any lunches that are wasted with this revelation

[3rdnlng]

 

I think she goes commando.

 

Apologies in advance for any lunches that are wasted with this revelation

You SOB. That wasn't lunch, but a goodly portion of my Abalone dinner regurgitated upon my date. Not sure what I bemoan the most--the loss of the Abalone or her.