Magox Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 Image from yesterday's meeting between Hill and Barry. Thick as thieves. Together forever. Who wouldn't want another 8 years of Obama policies? Run, Hillary, run. Could it be any phonier?
Doc Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 She can't run on her record and won't run on Barry's. Which won't sit well with Barry.
IDBillzFan Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 Could it be any phonier? And yet if you read comments from her Twitter followers, it's kind of surprising how many people absolutely adore seeing the two of them together, as though they really are the best of friends.
DC Tom Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 And yet if you read comments from her Twitter followers, it's kind of surprising how many people absolutely adore seeing the two of them together, as though they really are the best of friends. The only ones that like seeing them together like that are their dentists. Because imagine the teeth-grinding necessary to get through that hug.
B-Man Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 In a comment that now seems akin to her "what difference does it make" dismissal of the Benghazi, Libya, terror slayings of U.S. officials, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that how U.S. soldier Bowe Bergdahl ended up in Taliban hands "doesn't matter." Clinton was interviewed last June after President Obama traded five Taliban prisoners for Bergdahl, who on Wednesday was charged with desertion. Obama was criticized by many after the trade, with some suspecting that Bergdahl sympathized with the Taliban. But in the interview with ABC's Diane Sawyer, Clinton defended Obama in comments that she may have to answer for on the campaign trail. "If you look at what the factors were going into the decision, of course there are competing interests and values. And one of our values is we bring everybody home off the battlefield the best we can. It doesn't matter how they ended up in a prisoner of war situation," said Clinton. "It doesn't matter?" Sawyer asked. "It doesn't matter," Clinton said.
Nanker Posted March 26, 2015 Author Posted March 26, 2015 Sounds like a song for a campaign: What does it matter? What difference does it make... You came and blessed us with your presence and the media is on the take We'll forget all your foibles, and remember what you did like the Russian Reset, and the Arab Spring and all So what if Benghazi is in ruins, Bergdahl's free, and the Middle East did fall What does it matter? What difference does it make... The night show hosts all love you but not a bit more than we do No one will rise against you You have a vagina as most Americans do What does it matter? What difference does it make... So strike a blow for all us victims Make those with money pay They stole the money from us And you're friends with them anyway You're entitled to be President who cares who runs against you Think of the glorious precedent POTUS always sitting on the loo What does it matter? What difference does it make. Maybe we get Barry Manilow to play piano softly in the background as still images of Hill fade in and out with the Ken Burns effect drifting slowly across the screen.
B-Man Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 (edited) and so it begins........................... Hillary supporters warn reporter against using 'sexist' words...Prohibited words include: polarizing, calculating, disingenuous, insincere, ambitious, inevitable, entitled, over confident...'We will be watching, reading, listening and protesting coded sexism'... also; Scandals force Hillary Clinton to delay 2016 bid announcementWashington Times Original Article Shredders can only work but so fast. . Edited March 26, 2015 by B-Man
IDBillzFan Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 and so it begins........................... Hillary supporters warn reporter against using 'sexist' words... Prohibited words include: polarizing, calculating, disingenuous, insincere, ambitious, inevitable, entitled, over confident... 'We will be watching, reading, listening and protesting coded sexism'... As long as we can keep using the word 'shrill,' I'm good.
DC Tom Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 As long as we can keep using the word 'shrill,' I'm good. "Shameless," "opportunist," "harpy," and "carpetbagger" are conspicuously absent from the list, as well.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 "harpy" I'm partial to this one. Use it for the ex-wife as well.
Doc Posted March 26, 2015 Posted March 26, 2015 LOL! I was going to say "harpy." And the stupidity has already begun. Again, I weep for this country.
3rdnlng Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 I'm partial to this one. Use it for the ex-wife as well. Exactly the way I feel, but I spell "harpy", "c*nt".
Gary M Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 and so it begins........................... Hillary supporters warn reporter against using 'sexist' words... Prohibited words include: polarizing, calculating, disingenuous, insincere, ambitious, inevitable, entitled, over confident... 'We will be watching, reading, listening and protesting coded sexism'... also; Scandals force Hillary Clinton to delay 2016 bid announcement Washington Times Original Article Shredders can only work but so fast. . ‘coded sexism’ Ambitious Calculating Disingenuous Entitled Insincere Out of Touch Over Confident Polarizing Represent the Past Secretive Will Do Anything to Win Weren't some of these "coded racism" when describing Obama?
Chef Jim Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 (edited) coded sexism Ambitious Calculating Disingenuous Entitled Insincere Out of Touch Over Confident Polarizing Represent the Past Secretive Will Do Anything to Win Weren't some of these "coded racism" when describing Obama? Either that or Onama's a woman which makes sense too. Edited March 27, 2015 by Chef Jim
DC Tom Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 ‘coded sexism’ Ambitious Calculating Disingenuous Entitled Insincere Out of Touch Over Confident Polarizing Represent the Past Secretive Will Do Anything to Win Weren't some of these "coded racism" when describing Obama? No, coded racism was "intelligent," "well-spoken." Even referring to Barack Obama as "Barack Obama" is considered coded racism sometimes.
Chef Jim Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 No, coded racism was "intelligent," "well-spoken." Even referring to Barack Obama as "Barack Obama" is considered coded racism sometimes. When you're talking quarterbacks it's "Athletic"
IDBillzFan Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 No, coded racism was "intelligent," "well-spoken." Even referring to Barack Obama as "Barack Obama" is considered coded racism sometimes. Don't forget 'lazy.' And pointing out that he plays golf.
Doc Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 No, coded racism was "intelligent," "well-spoken." Even referring to Barack Obama as "Barack Obama" is considered coded racism sometimes. You'd think "no negro dialect" would have been coded racism.
DC Tom Posted March 27, 2015 Posted March 27, 2015 Don't forget 'lazy.' And pointing out that he plays golf. When you reflect on it, one is surprised that "White House" hasn't been called coded racism. Or even overt racism...a black man, and we force him to live in a specific place, and then insult him by calling where he lives "white?" That's almost as bad as serving him wine from vineyards that used to be slave-owning farms.
Recommended Posts