4merper4mer Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 If you're so incompetent you don't know the rules, you'll fit right in. To be fair to the commies I mean dems, they have put so many rules into place that no one brain is big enough to understand them all. The intent was to trip up others though and thus they should not be held accountable.
B-Man Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 WASHINGTON POST: The Continuing Political Decline Of Hillary Clinton. “If it weren’t for Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton would be the most disliked major-party presidential nominee in recent American history. That qualifier, of course, is important here. Clinton doesn’t need to be liked; she needs to be liked slightly more than Trump in what will very likely boil down to a two-candidate race. But it’s hard to overstate just how bad Clinton’s numbers are. And a new Washington Post-ABC News poll is the latest to suggest they just keep getting worse — so much so that they are in some ways about as bad as Trump’s.” Related, in the Chicago Tribune: “Hillary Clinton has disqualified herself from the presidency.”
DC Tom Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 “If it weren’t for Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton would be the most disliked major-party presidential nominee in recent American history. What a...coincidence...
Chef Jim Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 WASHINGTON POST: The Continuing Political Decline Of Hillary Clinton. “If it weren’t for Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton would be the most disliked major-party presidential nominee in recent American history. That qualifier, of course, is important here. Clinton doesn’t need to be liked; she needs to be liked slightly more than Trump in what will very likely boil down to a two-candidate race. But it’s hard to overstate just how bad Clinton’s numbers are. And a new Washington Post-ABC News poll is the latest to suggest they just keep getting worse — so much so that they are in some ways about as bad as Trump’s.” Related, in the Chicago Tribune: “Hillary Clinton has disqualified herself from the presidency.” I'm starting to think those that want a third term for Obama are on to something.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 I'm starting to think those that want a third term for Obama are on to something. No no NO. My God no. I'd rather Clinton than Obama. At the VERY least, she'll bring some semblance of a rational foreign policy with her.
Chef Jim Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 No no NO. My God no. I'd rather Clinton than Obama. At the VERY least, she'll bring some semblance of a rational foreign policy with her. And you know this how?
B-Man Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 No no NO. My God no. I'd rather Clinton than Obama. At the VERY least, she'll bring some semblance of a rational foreign policy with her.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 And you know this how? It's a comparative statement... the "compared to Barack Obama" is silent. Ugh, good point.
Doc Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 No no NO. My God no. I'd rather Clinton than Obama. At the VERY least, she'll bring some semblance of a rational foreign policy with her. ...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 ... OK OK *face on desk, grumbling* This election has me completely befuddled. There IS no good choice.
Doc Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 OK OK *face on desk, grumbling* This election has me completely befuddled. There IS no good choice. True. But again, they're what we have, a 3rd party vote is a wasted vote, and I've seen what LIAR has actually done and don't want any part of it.
DC Tom Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 No no NO. My God no. I'd rather Clinton than Obama. At the VERY least, she'll bring some semblance of a rational foreign policy with her. What on earth possesses you to think this? This is the woman who, under her husband's presidency, took the control of our foreign policy w/r/t Afghanistan away from an oil company and gave it to Mavis friggin' Leno.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 (edited) What on earth possesses you to think this? This is the woman who, under her husband's presidency, took the control of our foreign policy w/r/t Afghanistan away from an oil company and gave it to Mavis friggin' Leno. I'm thinking it's because I've lived through 8 years of BO's failure. Lame excuse, I know. Edited July 19, 2016 by joesixpack
DC Tom Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 I'm thinking it's because I've lived through 8 years of BO's failure. Lame excuse, I know. Pathetic excuse. Obama has a foreign policy. It's inconsistent, half-assed, amateurish, and basically retarded...but it is a foreign policy. Clinton's administration featured the complete absence of foreign policy. Quick, what's his greatest foreign policy achievement? The Oslo Accords (how are those going, again?) The creation of Republika Sprska?
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 Pathetic excuse. Obama has a foreign policy. It's inconsistent, half-assed, amateurish, and basically retarded...but it is a foreign policy. Clinton's administration featured the complete absence of foreign policy. Quick, what's his greatest foreign policy achievement? The Oslo Accords (how are those going, again?) The creation of Republika Sprska? Well, if you're a free-trader, there's NAFTA. That's all I've got.
meazza Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 Pathetic excuse. Obama has a foreign policy. It's inconsistent, half-assed, amateurish, and basically retarded...but it is a foreign policy. Clinton's administration featured the complete absence of foreign policy. Quick, what's his greatest foreign policy achievement? The Oslo Accords (how are those going, again?) The creation of Republika Sprska? Hey man he didn't get us into two wars paid on an American Express AMIRITE???
DC Tom Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 Hey man he didn't get us into two wars paid on an American Express AMIRITE??? Yeah, he had nothing to do with Iraq and Afghanistan.
keepthefaith Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 I'm thinking it's because I've lived through 8 years of BO's failure. Lame excuse, I know. It's very easy to look at Obama's foreign policy and feel like we must have bottomed out, it can't be worse with anyone else, the only way is up. I'm with you on that until we stop, pause and realize who is running to be President. We may not have bottomed out in any important area. Jimmy Carter, Obama and Hillary. Bill looks like a hero in comparison as he presided at a time when the world was less difficult and the economy was strong so he'll continue to be the left's Reagan.
reddogblitz Posted July 19, 2016 Posted July 19, 2016 Hey man he didn't get us into two wars paid on an American Express AMIRITE??? This was when Hillary was in the Senate and she was all for it. A Hillary foreign policy will probably look a lot like W's.
Recommended Posts