IDBillzFan Posted June 24, 2016 Posted June 24, 2016 AP: CLINTON CALENDAR HIDES 75 MEETINGS WITH DONORS... Clinton Email Scandal: Latest Batch Exposes Two Big New Problems For Hillary by John Merline Original Article. She probably would have updated her calendar but was probably suffering from PTSD after landing in Bosnia to greet a little girl under sniper fire.
B-Man Posted June 24, 2016 Posted June 24, 2016 09:45 AM.............................a little late with this response Hill...................... Hillary ClintonVerified account @HillaryClinton 24m24 minutes ago Our first task has to be to make sure that the economic uncertainty created by these events does not hurt working families. #BrexitVote
IDBillzFan Posted June 24, 2016 Posted June 24, 2016 09:45 AM.............................a little late with this response Hill...................... Hey Hillary...what the hell does that even mean? What tasks are you suggesting, specifically? Do you have a plan, or maybe you're just finding new ways to shove the words "working families" into another ridiculous tweet?
DC Tom Posted June 24, 2016 Posted June 24, 2016 09:45 AM.............................a little late with this response Hill...................... And how does one do that without eliminating "working families" from the economy? Retard.
unbillievable Posted June 24, 2016 Posted June 24, 2016 I saw a sci-fi show where they had a welfare system that allowed anyone to withdraw as much money as they wanted from the government. The catch was that each dollar taken results in your name being put into a national lottery to be euthanized. Even if the odds are astronomical, how much money would you take in that situation?
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted June 24, 2016 Posted June 24, 2016 I saw a sci-fi show where they had a welfare system that allowed anyone to withdraw as much money as they wanted from the government. The catch was that each dollar taken results in your name being put into a national lottery to be euthanized. Even if the odds are astronomical, how much money would you take in that situation? That's GENIUS.
DC Tom Posted June 24, 2016 Posted June 24, 2016 I saw a sci-fi show where they had a welfare system that allowed anyone to withdraw as much money as they wanted from the government. The catch was that each dollar taken results in your name being put into a national lottery to be euthanized. Even if the odds are astronomical, how much money would you take in that situation? I'd take billions, and tell everyone I'm gatorman.
B-Man Posted June 24, 2016 Posted June 24, 2016 And the beat goes on.....................................................................................right Bernie ? Donors can now write checks of up to $418,800 to Clinton's joint fund with the DNC: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/06/24/clinton-dnc-joint-campaign-fund-expands-to-benefit-six-new-states/ But, get money out of politics, or something, unicorn rainbow dust
DC Tom Posted June 25, 2016 Posted June 25, 2016 And the beat goes on.....................................................................................right Bernie ? Donors can now write checks of up to $418,800 to Clinton's joint fund with the DNC: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/06/24/clinton-dnc-joint-campaign-fund-expands-to-benefit-six-new-states/ But, get money out of politics, or something, unicorn rainbow dust But you left out the best part...the headline... Clinton-DNC Joint Campaign Fund Expands to Benefit Six New States Yeah, right, the states will benefit. From the "Hillary Victory Fund."
B-Man Posted June 26, 2016 Posted June 26, 2016 WARNING: “THIS WILL MAKE YOUR BLOOD BOIL” FTA: The Russian hacking of the DNC obviously bears on the subject. This is a complicated subject by itself. See Bill Gertz’s story “The cyber threat: Russian hackers behind DNC breach seeking to influence U.S. election.” The DNC consultant CrowdStrike stands by their attribution of the hacking to Russian authorities “Bears in the midst: Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee.” Let these stories cast their light on the FOX News report by Catherine Herridge and Pamela Browne: “Top IT official: Disabling security for Clinton server laid out ‘welcome mat’ for hackers.” And then we have this story by Tim Cushing at TechDirt, from the aptly named breaking-badly department: “Emails show Hillary Clinton’s email server was a massive security headache, set up to route around FOIA requests.” Jonathan Turley adds “New evidence indicates multiple hacking attempts and the disabling of security protections for Clinton server.”
reddogblitz Posted June 26, 2016 Posted June 26, 2016 As indicated in this email, she was open to using a state.gov account but she simply wanted her personal emails to remain private, as anyone would want." Anyone not named Hillary Clinton would use her government account for business and yahoo or Gmail or your own server even for personal. Why is this so difficult? It's what most people do.
DC Tom Posted June 26, 2016 Posted June 26, 2016 Anyone not named Hillary Clinton would use her government account for business and yahoo or Gmail or your own server even for personal. Why is this so difficult? It's what most people do. Because then she would have needed two different PDAs, and that's just too damned hard.
reddogblitz Posted June 27, 2016 Posted June 27, 2016 Because then she would have needed two different PDAs, and that's just too damned hard. That's what I do. That's what a lot of people do.
Observer Posted June 27, 2016 Posted June 27, 2016 That's what I do. That's what a lot of people do. I get that it's annoying. I fight it tooth and nail. But I don't have quite the same level of important documents flowing through my email. That this is not a big issue kills me.
GG Posted June 27, 2016 Posted June 27, 2016 Anyone not named Hillary Clinton would use her government account for business and yahoo or Gmail or your own server even for personal. Why is this so difficult? It's what most people do. Because most people would get fired on the spot for using a personal email account to conduct business, and anyone not named Hillary Clinton would be facing criminal charges for setting up a personal email account to circumvent federal laws.
Nanker Posted June 27, 2016 Author Posted June 27, 2016 Well, Hillary isn't most people. She's special. She's entitled to do whatever she wants to.
Deranged Rhino Posted June 27, 2016 Posted June 27, 2016 Well, Hillary isn't most people. She's special. She's entitled to do whatever she wants to. And yet, they're all going to vote for her.
Recommended Posts