OCinBuffalo Posted June 2, 2016 Posted June 2, 2016 (edited) A rather illuminating look at the present state of the democrat Party. SHOCK POLL: 71% of Dems Say Clinton Should Keep Running Even If Indicted... Tuesday, May 31, 2016 Most continue to believe likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton is a lawbreaker, but half of all voters also say a felony indictment shouldn’t stop her campaign for the presidency. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 43% of Likely U.S. Voters think Clinton should immediately stop campaigning if she is charged with a felony in connection with her use of a private e-mail server while secretary of State. Fifty percent (50%), however, think she should continue running until a court determines her guilt or innocence. (To see survey question wording, click here.) Among Democratic voters, 71% believe Clinton should keep running, a view shared by only 30% of Republicans and 46% of voters not affiliated with either major party. Yeah..but besides the obvious...that tells me that 70% of Republicans are idiots, or this poll, like so many before it, is utter garbage. Which morons in the R party don't want to run against an indicted candidate? The smartass factor alone means that number should be like 45%. I mean, if they polled some witless, humorless place like Kansas, or Indiana, then yeah, I can see 30%. But, if they ran the same poll of Rs in New York? That number is more like 80%...with a symphonic giggle accompaniment. If we polled this board, wouldn't the registered Rs here want an indicted Hillary...rather than something harder, and, to have an instant shut down argument to use against all the leftists they encounter? Who wouldn't want an instant leftist kill switch? Be awfully handy at the bar. This is like asking me if I want the Dolphins to keep Tannehill, or the Jets to keep G 3 Picko. Edited June 2, 2016 by OCinBuffalo
B-Man Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 This isn’t particularly subtle. Will Rahn added, Liz Kreutz @ABCLiz"Donald Trump is apparently of German heritage. What does that mean?" Hillary Clinton tells @abc7elex about judge comments 6 retweets8 likes Reply Retweet More Clinton: Trump partly to blame for violent anti-Trump protestors http://cnn.it/1TNVaPR #TheLead "Clinton supporters tripping over email spin" http://hill.cm/5vq0SyD
Nanker Posted June 4, 2016 Author Posted June 4, 2016 This is nothing new. ANY woman who disagrees with the Leftist agenda must be punished, disgraced, minimized, castigated, and silenced!
mead107 Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 (edited) Clinton👎🏿👎🏽👎👎🏻 Edited June 4, 2016 by mead107
IDBillzFan Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 Privileged white B word had it coming.[/tolerantleftposition]
Nanker Posted June 4, 2016 Author Posted June 4, 2016 I thought Bryan Pagilano Hilliary's IT goon had been granted immunity from prosecution in order to have him testify. But he stated his intention to plead the 5th and refuse to testify. Now the judge hearing the Judicial Watch case has required him to provide the immunity agreement and state the reason why he won't testify. Hope this heats up quickly.
Azalin Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 This is nothing new. ANY woman who disagrees with the Leftist agenda must be punished, disgraced, minimized, castigated, and silenced! You left out "attacked".
DC Tom Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 You left out "attacked". It's the new "She shouldn't have worn such a revealing outfit, she was asking for it."
B-Man Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 Georgie Stephanopoulos has a one-on-one interview with Hillary Clinton This Sunday - ABC release. .
reddogblitz Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 I thought Bryan Pagilano Hilliary's IT goon had been granted immunity from prosecution in order to have him testify. But he stated his intention to plead the 5th and refuse to testify. Now the judge hearing the Judicial Watch case has required him to provide the immunity agreement and state the reason why he won't testify. Hope this heats up quickly. The order delays Mr. Pagliano’s deposition, which had been scheduled for Monday, June 6. Another effective use of the Clinton legal strategy, delay delay delay ...
/dev/null Posted June 4, 2016 Posted June 4, 2016 The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy© strikes again: http://www.amazon.com/Crisis-Character-Discloses-Firsthand-Experience/dp/1455568872/
IDBillzFan Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 (edited) It seems like only yesterday the GOP was a white hot mess and the DNC was all in line for Hillary. Guess who's the white hot mess now? Sanders: We will have a contested convention. Man, oh, man, this is going to be awesome. Edited June 5, 2016 by LABillzFan
Taro T Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 It seems like only yesterday the GOP was a white hot mess and the DNC was all in line for Hillary. Guess who's the white hot mess now? Sanders: We will have a contested convention. Man, oh, man, this is going to be awesome. Tsk, tsk, tsk. My silly lad. A contested Republican convention would be proof of a party in disarray. A contested Democratic primary would be proof of our republican democracy principles still being live and vigorous. And would result in a far stronger candidate emerging than the one from the other party as that candidate would have merely been anointed with no scritiny whatsoever. (We are so screwed however this all plays out.)
Keukasmallies Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 I'm bettin' our next POTUS will prolly be an @$$hole....wait, our current POTUS is for sure....
Nanker Posted June 5, 2016 Author Posted June 5, 2016 I firmly believe you're 100% assured of that outcome.
Nanker Posted June 5, 2016 Author Posted June 5, 2016 (edited) They have a fine and glorious tradition of rioting. Nothing pointing to a peaceful convention there. Cleveland either for that matter. Hillary even sounds like Humphrey. And this little ditty by Mayor Daley is a classic: https://youtu.be/djB19XjuXvc Edited June 5, 2016 by Nanker
B-Man Posted June 5, 2016 Posted June 5, 2016 The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy© strikes again: http://www.amazon.com/Crisis-Character-Discloses-Firsthand-Experience/dp/1455568872/ The Contents page of the new book. Of course this is just an ex-secret service member confirming what has been written in other books, what would he know ? And as to its relevance to the 2016 presidential race ? Well the title answers that.
ALF Posted June 6, 2016 Posted June 6, 2016 (edited) Ex-Secret Service officer breaks silence on the 'real Hillary Clinton' Author and former Secret Service Officer Gary J. Byrne recalls being "posted directly outside President Clinton's Oval Office" and claims to have witnessed the personal and political dysfunction of the Clinton White House first hand. Within the forthcoming book, Byrne states that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton "lacks the integrity and temperament to serve in the office." Through the release of this book Byrne hopes the timing, coming months before the 2016 presidential election, will give voters a chance to learn about what he calls "real Hillary Clinton." Byrne also alleges in the introduction to have been involved in covering up President Clinton's adulteries, claiming he "even secretly disposed of sordid physical evidence that might later have been used to convict the president." http://www.aol.com/article/2016/06/06/ex-secret-service-officer-breaks-science-on-the-real-hillary-cl/21389788/ Edited June 6, 2016 by ALF
Recommended Posts