Jump to content

Hillary's Campaign Kickoff


Recommended Posts

Laughable media desperation towards Hillary

 

Never thought I'd see the day when Dem pundits/activists asserted that $4M of oil/gas campaign cash is unimportant

 

CfII8RWVIAY-s1D.jpg...MSNBC

 

 

 

 

 

 

CfIKJxiUUAIBfJy.jpgHow much has Hillary Clinton raised from the fossil fuel industry? @thomaskaplan fact-checks http://nyti.ms/1SLp0px

 

 

 

 

CfIhKgjUUAEgfd2.jpgit only seems "complicated" if youre desperate to help Dems defang the same attacks they make on the GOP

Did you know mitt Romney has a horse!???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hillary Clinton Says She's Unsure Bernie Sanders Is A Democrat

 

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/hillary-clinton-says-shes-unsure-bernie-sanders-is-a-democrat/ar-BBrqGT4?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=HPCDHP

 

 

 

Hillary Clinton has had enough of Bernie Sanders

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/hillary-clinton-has-had-enough-of-bernie-sanders-221495#ixzz453jNOAtU

 

32CDB65300000578-0-image-a-11_1459727710

 

 

 

 

 

Why Democrats Just Won’t Embrace Hillary
Hillary Clinton proved herself to be one wounded front-runner in last night’s Wisconsin primary.
Not only did she lose to Bernie Sanders by a double-digit margin, but exit polls showed she even narrowly lost female voters to him. A majority of Democrats cited either income inequality (30 percent) or health care (22 percent) as their most important issue.
Clinton lost those focused on inequality by 2 to 1 and also lost voters who were most interested in health care, once considered her signature issue.
Hillary’s weakest showing came among the third of Democrats who thought the most important issue was whether a candidate was honest or trustworthy. She was crushed in that category by 83 percent to 17 percent.
No matter how far to the left that Hillary moves in order to blunt the Sanders surge, she clearly is of limited appeal to rank-and-file Democrats. And much of it isn’t really about issues — it’s her character.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner
.

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Find the oft-repeated, yet completely untrue fact cited in this sentence.

 

This year, the foil is independent democratic socialist Bernie Sanders, a stubborn Brooklynite with a nearly non-existent path to the nomination and a nearly unquenchable thirst for humiliating the Democratic front-runner in her home state’s April 19 primary.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

She swipes the metrocard in back-side foreward! :w00t:

GHW Bush was crucified for not knowing about supermarket checkout scanners.

 

It should be a law that you can't run for President if you don't have a drivers license and haven't driven a car in over two decades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She swipes the metrocard in back-side foreward! :w00t:

GHW Bush was crucified for not knowing about supermarket checkout scanners.

 

It should be a law that you can't run for President if you don't have a drivers license and haven't driven a car in over two decades.

 

It's not near the GW thing you want it to be because there are plenty of leftists in NY right now, commenting on Twitter how they all have to swipe their cards four or five times to get them to work on the subway turnstiles.

 

That said, why in hell would you take Hillary -- a woman who admits that she is such an elitist that she hasn't driven a car in ten years -- into the bowels of the city with a TV camera crew? She doesn't belong there, and there is absolutely no upside to this photo op. None.

 

This speaks less to Hillary's elitism and more to the idiots running her campaign. She has NY in the bag. Sit down, shut up, and stop showing the world what a 1%er pig you are.

Edited by LABillzFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How Citizen's United is helping Hillary win the White House

 

Hillary Clinton fashions herself as the ultimate general in a war against big-money politics.

“You're not going to find anybody more committed to aggressive campaign finance reform than me,” Clinton said following the New Hampshire primary.

But the Democratic presidential front-runner stands poised to bludgeon her general election opponent with Republicans’ favorite political superweapon: the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which earlier this decade launched a new era of unbridled fundraising.

Clinton’s massive campaign machine is built of the very stuff — super PACs, secret cash, unlimited contributions — she says she’ll attack upon winning the White House.

Indeed, a Center for Public Integrity investigation reveals that Clinton’s own election efforts are largely immune from her reformist platform. While Clinton rails against “unaccountable money" that is “corrupting our political system,” corporations, unions and nonprofits bankrolled by unknown donors have already poured millions of dollars into a network of Clinton-boosting political organizations. That’s on top of the tens of millions an elite club of Democratic megadonors, including billionaires George Soros and Haim Saban, have contributed.

https://www.publicintegrity.org/2016/04/07/19521/how-citizens-united-helping-hillary-clinton-win-white-house

***************************************************


#HillarySoQualified, Pro Clinton Hashtag goes wrong fast

:lol:

But things quickly went south for Clinton supporters. Like other Clinton efforts aimed at social media — “7 things Hillary Clinton has in common with your abuela,” the doomed student debt emoji — #HillarySoQualified quickly backfired. Every grievance, real or imagined, anyone ever had against the candidate, it seemed, could be sarcastically aired under this big tent. By early Thursday, more than 90,000 tweets, many of them decidedly Clinton-unfriendly, had gone out under the #HillarySoQualified banner.

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/04/07/hillarysoqualified-pro-clinton-hashtag-goes-wrong-fast/


CfbVJ2_UAAAlOQB.jpg

Edited by Deranged Rhino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How Citizen's United is helping Hillary win the White House

 

Hillary Clinton fashions herself as the ultimate general in a war against big-money politics.

“You're not going to find anybody more committed to aggressive campaign finance reform than me,” Clinton said following the New Hampshire primary.

But the Democratic presidential front-runner stands poised to bludgeon her general election opponent with Republicans’ favorite political superweapon: the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which earlier this decade launched a new era of unbridled fundraising.

Clinton’s massive campaign machine is built of the very stuff — super PACs, secret cash, unlimited contributions — she says she’ll attack upon winning the White House.

Indeed, a Center for Public Integrity investigation reveals that Clinton’s own election efforts are largely immune from her reformist platform. While Clinton rails against “unaccountable money" that is “corrupting our political system,” corporations, unions and nonprofits bankrolled by unknown donors have already poured millions of dollars into a network of Clinton-boosting political organizations. That’s on top of the tens of millions an elite club of Democratic megadonors, including billionaires George Soros and Haim Saban, have contributed.

https://www.publicintegrity.org/2016/04/07/19521/how-citizens-united-helping-hillary-clinton-win-white-house

***************************************************

#HillarySoQualified, Pro Clinton Hashtag goes wrong fast

:lol:

But things quickly went south for Clinton supporters. Like other Clinton efforts aimed at social media — “7 things Hillary Clinton has in common with your abuela,” the doomed student debt emoji — #HillarySoQualified quickly backfired. Every grievance, real or imagined, anyone ever had against the candidate, it seemed, could be sarcastically aired under this big tent. By early Thursday, more than 90,000 tweets, many of them decidedly Clinton-unfriendly, had gone out under the #HillarySoQualified banner.

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/04/07/hillarysoqualified-pro-clinton-hashtag-goes-wrong-fast/

CfbVJ2_UAAAlOQB.jpg

Silencing free political speech doesn't suddenly and magically become virtuous just because you don't like individual outcomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silencing free political speech doesn't suddenly and magically become virtuous just because you don't like individual outcomes.

 

No one, least of all me, is talking about silencing political speech. My entire argument has been that the way the system is currently designed, the unfettered cash flowing into the system is absolutely disenfranchising a large chunk of Americans and silencing their voice.

 

Speech is not money. Money is not speech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...