Deranged Rhino Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 So you have zero problem with anyone at any level of government contacting YouTube to censor a video? None, zero, nada? You're asking for intellectual honesty from a poster who doesn't have an honest bone in his online persona. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 (edited) I'm going to bump this since it is important and it got buried on the past page while DR (cat) was playing with Gator (dead mouse)...... Hillary Has An NSA Problem: The FBI has been investigating Clinton for months—but an even more secretive Federal agency has its own important beef with her. FTA: Neither is the FBI the only powerful Federal agency that Hillary Clinton needs to worry about as she plots her path to the White House between scandals and leaks. For years, she has been on the bad side of the National Security Agency, America’s most important intelligence agency, as revealed by just-released State Department documents obtained by Judicial Watch under the Freedom of Information Act. . . . Now, over two months later, I can confirm that the contents of Sid Blumenthal’s June 8, 2011 email to Hillary Clinton, sent to her personal, unclassified account, were indeed based on highly sensitive NSA information. The Agency investigated this compromise and determined that Mr. Blumenthal’s highly detailed account of Sudanese goings-on, including the retelling of high-level conversations in that country, was indeed derived from NSA intelligence. Specifically, this information was illegally lifted from four different NSA reports, all of them classified Top Secret / Special Intelligence. Worse, at least one of those reports was issued under the GAMMA compartment, which is an NSA handling caveat that is applied to extraordinarily sensitive information (for instance, decrypted conversations between top foreign leadership, as this was). GAMMA is properly viewed as a SIGINT Special Access Program or SAP, several of which from CIA Ms. Clinton compromised in another series of her “unclassified” emails. Currently serving NSA officials have told me they have no doubt that Mr. Blumenthal’s information came from their reports. “It’s word-for-word, verbatim copying,” one of them explained. “In one case, an entire paragraph was lifted from an NSA report” that was classified Top Secret / Special Intelligence. How Sid Blumenthal got his hands on this information is the key question, and there’s no firm answer yet. Somebody should find out. . Edited March 18, 2016 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 18, 2016 Author Share Posted March 18, 2016 This is why a grand jury must be convened. This appears to be an egregious assault on national security - because the great entitled one wanted to do things in secret and not leave a messy trail that could expose her behind-the-scenes machinations. I don't believe she's stupid. I do believe she is evil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 This is why a grand jury must be convened. This appears to be an egregious assault on national security - because the great entitled one wanted to do things in secret and not leave a messy trail that could expose her behind-the-scenes machinations. I don't believe she's stupid. I do believe she is evil. Rumors are the FBI is going to recommend an indictment in June. They've given immunity to one of her aides and extradited the hacker gluicifer (sp) to make the case air tight. The DoJ won't indict her but she will be pushed out before the DNC primary in mid June. Of course most people pushing that sequence of events probably are underestimating how duplicitous and corrupt she truly is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Kurtz: Liberal pundits experiencing Hillary buyer’s remorse. "I know what you mean" How we now know that Hillary Clinton will not be prosecuted for anything FTA: This was a point made this week by Juliet Eilperin at the Washington Post. Traditionally, Presidents have bent over backward to at least lend the patina of non-involvement in such an election, allowing the voters to make their own choice, but not so in this case. But the bigger point is, why would President Obama tell his party to unite around a candidate at serious risk of criminal indictment — when all signs from the FBI would indicate a very good chance, if not a certainty, that indictment will be recommended based on the investigation? Of course, he would only do such a thing if he knew — was determined — that, no matter what, the chosen candidate would not be charged. Hillary Clinton herself has appeared to think she’s untouchable — even declaring with certainty that she will not be indicted. “Oh, for goodness, it’s not going to happen. I’m not even answering that question,” Clinton said recently in Miami. With the President being so clearly invested in electing a Democrat in general and Hillary Clinton in particular to continue his legacy, there’s simply no way he would risk putting his thumb on the scale for a candidate who might be essentially disqualified if she had to run the last stage of her campaign from a jail cell. With all that in mind, it’s difficult to conclude anything other than a presumption that Obama knows that Clinton will face no such peril. But how could he know that if the investigation isn’t even finished yet? More at the link: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Rumors are the FBI is going to recommend an indictment in June. They've given immunity to one of her aides and extradited the hacker gluicifer (sp) to make the case air tight. The DoJ won't indict her but she will be pushed out before the DNC primary in mid June. Of course most people pushing that sequence of events probably are underestimating how duplicitous and corrupt she truly is. bull ****. How do you indict royalty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 bull ****. How do you indict royalty? I agree. I don't see it happening but it would restore a lot of faith in the system if it did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 bull ****. How do you indict royalty? Guillotine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Shrillery will float above any indictment talk; she never had anything to do with a "classified" email on her private server. Oh yeah, and Bill did not have sex with that woman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Shrillery will float above any indictment talk; she never had anything to do with a "classified" email on her private server. Oh yeah, and Bill did not have sex with that woman. It depends on what the definition of "have" is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Can Obama pardon someone before they get charged? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 Can Obama pardon someone before they get charged? No. And by "No," I of course mean "He's not to supposed to be able to, but he has a phone and a pen. And a teleprompter, and a press corps, and we should wait until the election and let the people decide..." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 Can Obama pardon someone before they get charged? He likely already has, but there won't be any announcement about it. The infractions are right there for all of us to see like the Emperor's New Clothes, yet we're being told they aren't there. And enough people believe it that it ends up not meaning anything. Despite 4 dead people whose relatives have been called liars. It is disgusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 WikiLeaks has all of the released Hillary emails so far, here are the ones that mention the Illuminati for Dante's enjoyment: https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/?q=illuminati&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 ..And they all still vote Democrat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 I'm sure it's just a coincidence................... WikiLeaks @wikileaks Mar 18 Dear @Facebook: stop censoring our Hillary Clinton email release. No, really. Stop it. There is no technical excuse. pic.twitter.com/AMbIUiPkid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 I'm sure it's just a coincidence................... WikiLeaks @wikileaks Mar 18 Dear @Facebook: stop censoring our Hillary Clinton email release. No, really. Stop it. There is no technical excuse. pic.twitter.com/AMbIUiPkid Reddit is the same, anything that casts Hillary in anything less than a goddess like light is immediately down voted by bots until it's off the main page. Which shouldn't be surprising to anyone who's been paying even the slightest bit of attention to the ways in which the internet is manipulated by the powers that be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted March 19, 2016 Share Posted March 19, 2016 WikiLeaks has all of the released Hillary emails so far, here are the ones that mention the Illuminati for Dante's enjoyment: https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/?q=illuminati&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult From your link: https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/29808 To: 'sbwhoeop Subject: Re: Max's new epilogue to paperback edition of "Republican Gomorrah": The Right's Days of Rage Thx so much for a wonderful visit. Just reminds me how much I miss seeing you and Jackie. I loved the epilogue but it stopped abruptly and I can't pull up the rest so I'm anxiously awaiting for the rest. Pls congratulate Max for another impressive piece. He's so good. All the best----H Original Message From: sbwhoeop Sent: Tue Aug 17 09:55:12 2010 Subject: Max's new epilogue to paperback edition of "Republican Gomorrah": The Right's Days of Rage AlterNet <http://www.alternetorg/images/site/logo.gif> Days of Rage -- The Noxious Transformation of the Conservative Movement into a Rabid Fringe By Max Blumenthal, Nation Books Posted on August 10, 2010, Printed on August 17, 2010 http://www.alternet.org/story/147784/ Editor's Note: The following is the new epilogue from Max Blumenthal's book, Republic Gomorrah< http://republicangomorrah.com/buy.php>, now out in paperback (Basic/Nation Books, 2009). "He will tell you that he wants a strong authority to take from him the crushing responsibility of thinking for himself. Since the Republic is weak, he is led to break the law out of love for obedience. But is it really strong authority that he wishes? in reality he demands rigorous order for others, and for himself disorder without responsibility." -- Jean-Paul Sartre, "Anti-Semite and Jew" I am not sure when I first detected the noxious fumes that would envelop the conservative movement in the Obama era. It might have been early on, in April 2009, when I visited a series of gun shows in rural California and Nevada. Perusing tables piled high with high-caliber semi-automatic weapons and chatting with anyone in my vicinity, I heard urgent warnings of mass roundups, concentration camps, and a socialist government in Washington. "These people that are purchasing these guns are people that are worried about what's going on in this country," a gun dealer told me outside a show in Reno. "Good luck Obama," a young gun enthusiast remarked to me. "We outnumber him 100 to 1." At this time, the Tea Party movement had not even registered on the national media's radar. In September 2009, I led a panel discussion about this book inside an auditorium filled with nearly 100 students and faculty at the University of California-Riverside. Beside me sat Jonathan Walton, an African-American professor of religious studies and prolific writer, and Mark Takano, an erudite, openly gay former Democratic congressional candidate and local community college trustee. In the middle of our discussion, a dozen College Republicans stormed the front of the stage with signs denouncing me as a "left-wing hack" while a hysterical young man leaped from the crowd, blowing kisses mockingly at Takano while heckling Walton as a "racist." Afterward, university police officers insisted on escorting me to my ride after the right-wing heckler attempted to follow me as he shouted threats. UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776231 Date: 09/30/2015 Who was this stalker? Just a concerned citizen worried about taxes? His name was Ryan Sorba and he was an operative of a heavily funded national conservative youth outfit, the Intercollegiate Studies Institute. Besides founding dozens of Republican youth groups across the country, Sorba has devoted an exceptional amount of energy to his interest in homosexuals. His intellectual output consists of a tract titled The Born Gay Hoax, arguing that homosexuality is at once a curable disease and a bogus trend manufactured by academic leftists. Adding to his credentials, Sorba has a history of run-ins with the law, he explained when I called him about the order. My encounter with this aggressive right-wing cadre seemed a strange, isolated event. But the hostility turned out to be symptomatic of the intensifying campaign to delegitimize President Obama and his allies in Congress. The Right's days of rage were only beginning. Through his first year in office, Obama seemed oblivious to the threat of the far right. He campaigned against partisanship, declaring that there were "no red states" and no "conservative America." Apparently, he thought it was merely a contrivance or myth that there were people who rejected science, demonized gays, assailed minority and women's rights -- or that they genuinely believed in what they said. Speaking of changing Washington, Obama seemed to think that the entire history of politics since the rise of Reagan and the Right and their strategies of polarization was not deeply rooted but a superficial problem attributable to certain "divisive" personalities, easily wiped away with gestures toward bipartisanship. His view of the parties was that they were simply mirror images sharing fundamental beliefs but separated by "partisans." The skilled and devoted community organizer could bring them together. Many of his supporters in the media, often part and parcel of political wars over the years, reinforced and amplified his innocence, proclaiming he was the one at last who could "bridge the partisan divide." Andrew Sullivan, a disaffected conservative who once called critics of George W. Bush policies "fifth columnists" but now fervently supporting Obama, wrote that the new president was destined to become "a liberal Reagan who can reunite America." This optimism pervaded the Obama White House as the president and his aides sought out Republicans willing to vote for his programs. After all, why couldn't we all just get along? In his autobiographical book The Audacity of Hope, Obama highlighted a key component of his political strategy: "I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views." Once he was elected, conservatives concluded that they could reverse Obama's strength by transforming him into a human tableau for the most fearsome images they could conjure. Obama's multiracial background was crucial in cultivating resentment among the shock troops. Those who rejected Obama's legitimacy to serve as president on the basis of his background gave birth to the "Birther" movement that sought to challenge his citizenship. The movement's most visible figure, and therefore the most eccentric, was Orly Taitz, a dentist and self-trained lawyer who had immigrated from the former Soviet republican of Moldova to Israel before settling in the conservative bastion of Orange County, California. Convinced by claims on the far-right Web site WorldNetDaily that Obama planned to create a "civilian national security force," Taitz told me she "realized that Obama was another Stalin--it's a cross between Stalinist USSR and Hitler's Germany." After becoming transfixed by online conspiracy theories claiming Obama's family had forged his birth certificate in Hawaii, Taitz snapped into action. She filed a lawsuit in November 2008 with California Secretary of State Debra Bowen demanding an investigation into Obama's eligibility to serve as president. Taitz's plaintiff in the case was Wiley Drake, an Orange County radio preacher and former second vice president of the Southern Baptist Convention who once publicly prayed for Obama's death. While her lawsuit went nowhere, and subsequent suits earned her angry rebukes from judges, Taitz became an instant media sensation, delivering heavily accented screeds against Obama before friendly interviewers from Sean Hannity to CNN's Lou Dobbs, who Taitz called her "greatest supporter" and who was eventually fired as an indirect result of his hosting of her. In March 2009, Texas Rep. Randy Neugebauer signed on to a Birther bill proposing that future presidential candidates must prove their citizenship before becoming eligible to campaign. The Birther movement had found its voice in government and made an indelible impact on the Republican grassroots. By June 2009, 28 percent of Republican UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776231 Date: 09/30/2015 respondents to a Kos/Research 2000 poll said they thought Obama wasn't born in the United States, while 30 percent "weren't sure." "Obama should be in the Big House," Taitz shrieked to me, "not the White House!" When Obama announced health care reform as the first major initiative of his administration, the conservative movement activated a campaign of demonization -- transformational politics -- designed to turn Obama into the "Other," making him seem as unfamiliar, and therefore as threatening, as possible. When the president urged the Congress to deliver a health care reform bill in 2009, the Right staged a living theater of political hatred, Obama's dream of bipartisanship transformed into a nightmarish version of "Marat/Sade." On September 12, 2009, tens of thousands of far-right activists belonging to a loose confederation of anti-government groups called the Tea Party Patriots converged on Washington's National Mall for a giant protest against the Obama health care plan. The date was significant: Fox News's top-ranked talk show host Glenn Beck had declared the birth of the "9-12 Project" to restore the sense of unity -- and siege mentality -- that Americans experienced on September 11, 2001. But this time, Obama -- not Osama -- was the enemy. While covering the rally, I witnessed sign after sign declaring Obama a greater danger to America's security than al- Qaida; demonstrators held images that juxtaposed Obama's face with images of evildoers from Hitler to Poi Pot to Bin Laden; others carried signs questioning Obama's status as a U.S. citizen. "We can fight al-Qaida, we can't kill Obama," said an aging demonstrator. Another told me, "Obama is the biggest Nazi in the world," pointing to placards he had fashioned depicting Obama arid House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi in SS outfits. According to another activist, Obama's agenda was similar to Hitler's: "Hitler took over the banking industry, did he not? And Hitler had his own personal secret service police. [The community-organizing group] ACORN is an extension of that."........................................................................and on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 19, 2016 Author Share Posted March 19, 2016 Can I buy a carriage return or perhaps a couple of dozen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts