IDBillzFan Posted March 14, 2016 Posted March 14, 2016 (edited) I follow Old Pics Archives on twitter...and this just got posted...1993 photo of Hillary playing with a Game Boy. Funny how much it looks like that image of her with her Blackberry. Really wish she just would have stuck with gaming. Edited March 14, 2016 by LABillzFan
Tiberius Posted March 14, 2016 Posted March 14, 2016 Is she going to prison yet? Wtf... Nope, going to the white house
/dev/null Posted March 14, 2016 Posted March 14, 2016 I follow Old Pics Archives on twitter...and this just got posted...1993 photo of Hillary playing with a Game Boy. Funny how much it looks like that image of her with her Blackberry. Really wish she just would have stuck with gaming. Up up down down left right left right B A Select Start didn't work in Benghazi
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted March 14, 2016 Posted March 14, 2016 Up up down down left right left right B A Select Start didn't work in Benghazi Best cheat code ever couldn't save her
IDBillzFan Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 (edited) Best cheat code ever couldn't save her Assuming she wanted to be saved. But it wasn't her ass getting dragged through the streets in Benghazi so what difference, at this point, does it make? SIdenote from Clinton yesterday: "We didn't lose a single person" in Libya. How sad. Edited March 15, 2016 by LABillzFan
meazza Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Assuming she wanted to be saved. But it wasn't her ass getting dragged through the streets in Benghazi so what difference, at this point, does it make? SIdenote from Clinton yesterday: "We didn't lose a single person" in Libya. How sad. Funny I'm watching a cnn report on trumps falsehoods. I wonder when they'll get to Hillary.
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Assuming she wanted to be saved. But it wasn't her ass getting dragged through the streets in Benghazi so what difference, at this point, does it make? I'm relatively certain if they cared enough to save our besieged Americans they could have before it was too late. There were enough special ops assets available nevermind more conventional forces. I keep envisioning a scene like in black hawk down when the 2 delta snipers Gary Gordon and Randy Shugart and pilot Michael Durant are steadily overwhelmed by a mob. Not good. And to call the fallen heros families liars is unconscionable.
DC Tom Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Funny I'm watching a cnn report on trumps falsehoods. I wonder when they'll get to Hillary. Hillary doesn't have falsehoods. She just "misremembers."
keepthefaith Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Hillary doesn't have falsehoods. She just "misremembers." Which is understandable at her age and she doesn't move fast or far enough to move any blood to the brain.
IDBillzFan Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 (edited) I'm relatively certain if they cared enough to save our besieged Americans they could have before it was too late. There were enough special ops assets available nevermind more conventional forces.Of course they could have. Stevens requested more security days before the attack. They left them for dead, lied about the cause, lied to the victims' families, then lied ABOUT the victims' families. And she still beats Trump by 13 points. Y'all think about THAT. Edited March 15, 2016 by LABillzFan
B-Man Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Clinton commits Benghazi gaffe, saying US ´didn´t lose a single person´ in Libya by Ed Henry Original Article Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton committed her second gaffe in as many days on the campaign trail Monday night, claiming that the U.S. "didn´t lose a single person" in Libya during her time as secretary of state. Clinton made the comment defending her push for regime change in the war-torn North African nation at an Illinois town hall hosted by MSNBC. "Now, is Libya perfect? It isn´t," Clinton said. After contrasting her approach toward Libya with the ongoing bloodshed in Syria´s civil war, Clinton said "Libya was a different kind of calculation and we didn´t lose a single person ... Ambassador Stevens was unavailable for comment.
Nanker Posted March 15, 2016 Author Posted March 15, 2016 She's not lying. It's just Clinton-speak that she learned from the master. "I did not have sex with that woman... not a single time." No, you had sex with her multiple times you cad. "Libya was a different kind of calculation and we didn't lose a single person." No, you lying piece of human excrement in shoes. We lost four of them and one was your fu cking employee. The Clintons hate their employees. They pay women $0.76 on the dollar compared to their men.
B-Man Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Politico also picked up the story: “Libya was a different kind of calculation. And we didn’t lose a single person. We didn’t have a problem in supporting our European and Arab allies in working with NATO,” the former secretary of state said during an MSNBC town hall on Monday night. Clinton may have been referring strictly to the U.S.-backed overthrow of Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi in 2011, which indeed saw no loss of American lives and cost just around $1 billion. But her comments ignore the 2012 attacks at the U.S. mission and CIA outpost in Benghazi, which killed four people including U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens. Ousting Qaddafi was worth it, Clinton said. “Now, is Libya perfect? It isn’t. But did they have two elections that were free and fair where they voted for moderates. Yes, they did. So you know, changing from a dictator who has hollowed out your country to something resembling a functioning state and even hopefully more of a democratic one doesn’t happen overnight,” she said. “And we’ve got to continue to support the Libyan people, to give them a chance, because otherwise you see what has happened in Syria, with the consequences of millions of people flooding out of Syria, with more than 250,000 people killed, with terrorist groups like ISIS taking up almost — huge blocks of territory, as big as some of the states in that area.” Yes, she did ignore the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi. But these remarks ignore a lot more than that. Qaddafi’s Libya was a brutal dictatorship, but one that had been cooperating in some part against radical Islamist terrorist groups, and had a functioning military that kept them on the run. Decapitating the regime without any way to influence developments on the ground did not result in “a functioning state.” It resulted in a failed state. The government that held two elections cannot even claim all of Tripoli as under its control, and its writ runs nowhere else in the country. Most stunning of all, Clinton seems unaware that ISIS is taking up blocs of territory in Libya now, too. So have al-Qaeda affiliates like Ansar al-Sharia — the group that sacked our Benghazi consulate nearly four years ago, thanks in large part to security decisions made by State under Hillary’s leadership. We didn’t give Libya a chance — we destroyed Libya, and left nothing but a viper pit of terror networks to replace it. And Hillary thinks this is a success story. If we elect her as President, expect a lot more “success” stories like Libya.
4merper4mer Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Assuming she wanted to be saved. But it wasn't her ass getting dragged through the streets in Benghazi so what difference, at this point, does it make? SIdenote from Clinton yesterday: "We didn't lose a single person" in Libya. How sad. Oh my God.
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Oh my God. How she's still a candidate is beyond me.
Dorkington Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 The fact that Trump and Clinton are the leading candidates says a lot about this country.
Tiberius Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 The fact that Trump and Clinton are the leading candidates says a lot about this country. It does? Like what?
IDBillzFan Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 (edited) How she's still a candidate is beyond me. Because she's backed by a party comprising people like gatorman who simply do what they're told without ever questioning the party's intent. Good little SoProgs always obey their overlords. Edited March 15, 2016 by LABillzFan
Tiberius Posted March 15, 2016 Posted March 15, 2016 Because she's backed by a party comprising people like gatorman who simply do what they're told without ever questioning the party's intent. Good little SoProgs always obey their overlords. What do you....hold on, Hillary is on the phone telling me what to do. I'll get back to you later!
Recommended Posts