3rdnlng Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 Someone at The Onion appears to be lurking here. http://www.theonion.com/article/obama-compiles-shortlist-gay-transsexual-abortion--52361 From your article: Here is a step-by-step guide to how U.S. Supreme Court justices are selected: Step 1: Supreme Court vacancy opens after a sitting justice dies, retires, or is promoted to the Galactic Circuit Step 2: President wistfully crosses out own name from list of potential candidates Step 3: Official presidential nominee slowly lowered by rope into Senate Judiciary Committee pit Step 4: Nominee charged one-time $30 background check fee Step 5: Candidate asked whether they see themselves in exact same place 35 years from now Step 6: Judiciary Committee members ask nominee whether they capable of writing a dissent that could be described as “blistering” Step 7: Candidate attests they have no opinion whatsoever on issue of abortion, don’t know what it is, and frankly have never heard such a word uttered before Step 8: Senate takes nominee out to drinks to see how they act in casual, informal setting Step 9: Nominee stands as their predecessor’s robe is draped over them to see if government can save a few bucks on not ordering a new one Step 10: Following months of direct questioning, witness testimony, and poring over the nominee’s qualifications and judicial history, the Senate votes on whether they like the president or not Step 11: If confirmed, justice takes oath of office and is assigned a bench buddy to help them through their first few opinions Step 12: If candidate not confirmed, process repeats indefinitely until other party holds White House or country is awash in the hot, crimson blood of neighbor killing neighbor, whichever comes first
Azalin Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 From your article: Here is a step-by-step guide to how U.S. Supreme Court justices are selected: Step 1: Supreme Court vacancy opens after a sitting justice dies, retires, or is promoted to the Galactic Circuit Step 2: President wistfully crosses out own name from list of potential candidates Step 3: Official presidential nominee slowly lowered by rope into Senate Judiciary Committee pit Step 4: Nominee charged one-time $30 background check fee Step 5: Candidate asked whether they see themselves in exact same place 35 years from now Step 6: Judiciary Committee members ask nominee whether they capable of writing a dissent that could be described as “blistering” Step 7: Candidate attests they have no opinion whatsoever on issue of abortion, don’t know what it is, and frankly have never heard such a word uttered before Step 8: Senate takes nominee out to drinks to see how they act in casual, informal setting Step 9: Nominee stands as their predecessor’s robe is draped over them to see if government can save a few bucks on not ordering a new one Step 10: Following months of direct questioning, witness testimony, and poring over the nominee’s qualifications and judicial history, the Senate votes on whether they like the president or not Step 11: If confirmed, justice takes oath of office and is assigned a bench buddy to help them through their first few opinions Step 12: If candidate not confirmed, process repeats indefinitely until other party holds White House or country is awash in the hot, crimson blood of neighbor killing neighbor, whichever comes first I knew it was satire as soon as I read #9.
3rdnlng Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 I knew it was satire as soon as I read #9. The reference to the "Galactic Circuit" in #1 didn't give you a hint?
Azalin Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 The reference to the "Galactic Circuit" in #1 didn't give you a hint? You never know with Washingtonians....
DC Tom Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 I knew it was satire as soon as I read #9. I'm still not sure it is...
Chef Jim Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 I'm still not sure it is... A bullet point saying the government is trying to save money and you're still not sure?
DC Tom Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 A bullet point saying the government is trying to save money and you're still not sure? The government is ALWAYS trying to save money. They spend billions of dollars trying to save money.
Chef Jim Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 The government is ALWAYS trying to save money. They spend billions of dollars trying to save money. Ok....that makes sense.
Azalin Posted February 17, 2016 Posted February 17, 2016 The government is ALWAYS trying to save money. They spend billions of dollars trying to save money.
B-Man Posted February 18, 2016 Posted February 18, 2016 (edited) Really ? This is kind of a surprise............... Report: AFL-CIO will not endorse Hillary Clinton in major win for Bernie Sanders http://hill.cm/TlnGjQR Edited February 18, 2016 by B-Man
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted February 18, 2016 Posted February 18, 2016 Really ? This is kind of a surprise............... Report: AFL-CIO will not endorse Hillary Clinton in major win for Bernie Sanders http://hill.cm/TlnGjQR Apparently a socialist is more appealing to big labor. Lol
B-Man Posted February 18, 2016 Posted February 18, 2016 Its not her.............................its us HILLARY BLAMES AMERICA: NOT READY FOR WOMAN Tightening race rattles Clinton...If loses Nevada '**** will hit fan'...
reddogblitz Posted February 18, 2016 Posted February 18, 2016 HILLARY BLAMES AMERICA: NOT READY FOR WOMAN And we in this country not only have to make our democracy work, we’ve got to make it work for the rest of the world, who will look at us and say, ‘This is what a democracy is.’ ” A shining city on a hill?
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 18, 2016 Posted February 18, 2016 Its not her.............................its us HILLARY BLAMES AMERICA: NOT READY FOR WOMAN Tightening race rattles Clinton...If loses Nevada '**** will hit fan'... Harpy.
IDBillzFan Posted February 18, 2016 Posted February 18, 2016 Its not her.............................its us Straight from the Barack Obama School of Incompetence Playbook. I remember during his first five or six years explaining to the media that the reason his policies and plans weren't working was because he simply wasn't explaining everything in terms simple enough for the average idiot American to understand. It's not him. It's us! If only we were smarter than the dumbass in office.
keepthefaith Posted February 18, 2016 Posted February 18, 2016 Straight from the Barack Obama School of Incompetence Playbook. I remember during his first five or six years explaining to the media that the reason his policies and plans weren't working was because he simply wasn't explaining everything in terms simple enough for the average idiot American to understand. It's not him. It's us! If only we were smarter than the dumbass in office. I hate to say it but it is us. If the collective "we" had more on the ball, Obama would never have been re-elected, Hillary would be polling single digits, Bernie would not even be running, Trump would not be leading and several more capable people (who have never run) would be candidates because voters would have a history of rejecting the liars, windbags, the incompetent and anyone that is far left.
Doc Posted February 18, 2016 Posted February 18, 2016 Like Dan Aykroyd's character Ray Zalinksy in "Tommy Boy" said: "what the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public."
Deranged Rhino Posted February 18, 2016 Posted February 18, 2016 Like Dan Aykroyd's character Ray Zalinksy in "Tommy Boy" said: "what the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." Any Tommy Boy quote deserves a
4merper4mer Posted February 18, 2016 Posted February 18, 2016 Any Tommy Boy quote deserves a Then stick your butcher's head up Hillary's ass if you want to find out if you like it so much then.
Deranged Rhino Posted February 18, 2016 Posted February 18, 2016 Then stick your butcher's head up Hillary's ass if you want to find out if you like it so much then.
Recommended Posts