IDBillzFan Posted August 15, 2016 Posted August 15, 2016 Obama got ahead because he got ahead. He got ahead because he got ahead? I'm not even sure you know what that means. But what has become increasingly clear through this discussion is that you are precisely the kind of people I am talking about. I've been very clear in my reasoning. You can look up and confirm everything I posted about Obama, and how he got to where he is. And yet you are left arguing against it by explaining that I am either (a) stupid or (b) a racist. You're literally taking the one-hit-wonder line that the DNC has lived off of for the past seven years. Since I'm just another stupid racist, please break down for me all of Barack Obama's collegiate and employment accomplishments before he became a US Senator. Show me how he earned everything. Show me his grades. Tell me about his law degree. List all the things he got done as an Illinois senator. Break it down. We'll wait.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted August 15, 2016 Posted August 15, 2016 Nice. Please, PLEASE, tell me you don't think he was qualified to be president. Please.
IDBillzFan Posted August 15, 2016 Posted August 15, 2016 Wow - so well written its almost.... First - The GOP told BO to go phuck himself on the day he was inaugurated. Second - So Bush got into Harvard, out of Vietnam, got a baseball team given to him Trump got anywhere....blah blah blah....affirmative action is ALL over the place whitey....I'll give more merit to HRC and BO's climb than to either of those two spoon fed clowns.. and C - Gotta work today? Huh.....go figger... Hey, look, it's baskin. Let me guess..."blah, blah, blah...George Bush...blah, blah, blah...." Yep...as predictable as any liberal around.
B-Man Posted August 15, 2016 Posted August 15, 2016 Hey, look, it's baskin. Let me guess..."blah, blah, blah...George Bush...blah, blah, blah...." Yep...as predictable as any liberal around. I'm especially glad that the new members of the board were here to read baskin's latest post of pure liberal gibberish................. .
Nanker Posted August 15, 2016 Author Posted August 15, 2016 Ladies and Gentlemen, your next President of the Untied States: http://youtu.be/2Ojeiby_l7E
truth on hold Posted August 15, 2016 Posted August 15, 2016 (edited) Saudis targeting schools and hospitLs in Yemen with the weapons hillary sold them after their multimillion donations to the clinton "foundation". Saudi coalition kills 10 children in their classroom in Yemen air strike http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/13/10-children-killed-in-their-classroom-by-saudi-coalition-airstri/ Edited August 15, 2016 by truth on hold
B-Man Posted August 16, 2016 Posted August 16, 2016 By reviewing the activities of Presidential candidates Trump and Clinton a new phenomenon has appeared.While Trump continues to smash Clinton in attendance at events, Hillary appears to have decided to take weekends off. Clinton took the weekend of August 6th and 7th off and she decided to take three days off this past weekend August 12th through 14th. She also has no events scheduled to participate in this coming Thursday through Saturday August 18th through 20th. This in essence would mean another three days off after three days of events scheduled starting today. In total Clinton has taken 7 days off in August out of the first 14 days and is scheduled to continue with this approach through at least this coming Saturday. Donald Trump on the other hand has taken only two days off in August, Sunday August 7th and Sunday the 14th. Trump has 7 days where he has participated in more than one campaign event. As previously noted, Trump has more than ten times the number of people at his campaign events than Hillary has at hers since August 1st. More than 100,000 people have shown up for Trump events since the beginning of August (with many more turned away due to the events reaching capacity). Hillary on the other hand hasn’t even had one tenth of that or not even 10,000 show up at her events since August 1st. Also, it is clear by just looking at the crowds at Trump and Clinton events that Trump has a movement and Hillary has barely a heartbeat. Trump’s largest event was in Ft Lauderdale, Florida, where it was estimated that the massive crowd there to see him was near 20,000. The largest crowd Clinton spoke at was in Washington, DC but this was a NABJ/NAHJ Event which had an estimated 4,000 in attendance. Hillary’s largest event held by her campaign in August was back on August 1st in Omaha, NE when businessman Warren Buffett joined her and an estimated 3,000 locals. In total when looking at just the Clinton campaign events, barely 8,000 people showed up to the seven campaign events since August 1st. Also, as previously noted in a related post, Trump is destroying Clinton on social media. Trump is crushing Hillary in attendance at events as seen in pictures and in numbers, and in social media in tweets, Facebook shares and YouTube live streams. It is unknown why Clinton is taking so much time off. Questions arise whether it is related to her terrible campaign event turnout or her poor health or some combination of both.
4merper4mer Posted August 16, 2016 Posted August 16, 2016 (edited) It is unknown why Clinton is taking so much time off. Questions arise whether it is related to her terrible campaign event turnout or her poor health or some combination of both.Lol doofus. It is because of A. Gigantic lead in all polls B. The less she talks, the better her chance to keep the lead. Edited August 16, 2016 by 4merper4mer
IDBillzFan Posted August 16, 2016 Posted August 16, 2016 Lol doofus. It is because of A. Gigantic lead in all polls B. The less she talks, the better her chance to keep the lead. Jauronball...with a cackle.
ALF Posted August 16, 2016 Posted August 16, 2016 (edited) Wisconsin sheriff blames 'tribal behavior' for Milwaukee violence "The law of the jungle replaced the rule of law in Milwaukee Saturday night over an armed career criminal suspect who confronted police." He described the urban, black poor as victims. "The actions were the manifestation of a population with no hope, no stake in the American dream that could provide advancement and purpose and pride of self. They are the ones lied to, exploited by and ultimately manipulated by the Democrats who claim to care. They are victims of the left, but they are not without blame." David A. Clarke, Jr. ✔ @SheriffClarke Failed Democrat Progressive liberal urban policies create ghettos like Milwaukee that erupt into violence at the most inane provocation. http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/16/us/milwaukee-county-sheriff-david-clarke-profile/index.html I'am a Independent and I approve this message Edited August 16, 2016 by ALF
Deranged Rhino Posted August 16, 2016 Posted August 16, 2016 More fallout from the Soros hack: Soros Hack Reveals Plot Behind Europe's Refugee Crisis; Media Manipulation; Cash For "Social Justice" The review states, “The refugee crisis is opening new opportunities” for “coordination and collaboration” with other wealthy donors. It is almost as if Europe's refugee crisis was planned and prepared, not just by the Soros organization, but others who would benefit from a shift in the change of regional "migration governance", i.e., the reimposition of sovereignty terms, as Greece found out the hard way several months ago when its sovereignty was relegated to the country's willingness to participate in Europe's refugee scheme. It will hardly come as a surprise that according to the review, immigration policy-makers need to accept the refugee crisis as a “new normal.” One of the conclusions listed in the memo is, “Accepting the current crisis as the new normal and moving beyond the need to react.” (Snip) Aside from Europe's refugee crisis, the data leak provides other important glimpses in Soros' influence of global affairs. One memo, which is an overview of the "Ukraine Media Project" exposes how Soros influences media coverage of events in Ukraine, something previously touched upon in a June 2015 post titled "Hacked Emails Expose George Soros As Ukraine Puppet-Master." In the memo which reveals how Soros hopes to "cover" events in Ukraine, the authors admit that "this isn’t proper independent journalism and we may damage our credibility with journalists" and admit that "journalists may produce stories that have no relevance for the narrative we seek to inform or stories that are counterproductive (enforcing narratives of fascism etc.)" http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-16/soros-hack-reveals-plot-behind-europes-refugee-crisis-media-funding-and-manipulation
drinkTHEkoolaid Posted August 16, 2016 Posted August 16, 2016 The extent Soros will go to push his agenda is very disturbing, even more outrageous is he gets away with it.
4merper4mer Posted August 16, 2016 Posted August 16, 2016 Jauronball...with a cackle. One cackle but two cankles.
Observer Posted August 16, 2016 Posted August 16, 2016 He got ahead because he got ahead? I'm not even sure you know what that means. But what has become increasingly clear through this discussion is that you are precisely the kind of people I am talking about. I've been very clear in my reasoning. You can look up and confirm everything I posted about Obama, and how he got to where he is. And yet you are left arguing against it by explaining that I am either (a) stupid or (b) a racist. You're literally taking the one-hit-wonder line that the DNC has lived off of for the past seven years. Since I'm just another stupid racist, please break down for me all of Barack Obama's collegiate and employment accomplishments before he became a US Senator. Show me how he earned everything. Show me his grades. Tell me about his law degree. List all the things he got done as an Illinois senator. Break it down. We'll wait. You say he's president because he's black. Period. Got a wife, daughter, sister who has heard that they got their position because they are a woman? That's the demeaning argument you're making. You don't get the presidency by race, especially minority race. He worked hard, played politics, and rose. I never voted for him so I don't have to do your dance.
B-Man Posted August 16, 2016 Posted August 16, 2016 DEM CANDIDATE CAN’T SAY HILLARY IS HONEST: “Democratic New Hampshire Gov. Maggie Hassan declined three separate times to answer whether she believes Hillary Clinton is “honest” during an interview Monday on CNN.” Hillary is a presidential candidate. When Trump shoots his mouth and angers Repubs it’s big time mainstream news.
Doc Posted August 16, 2016 Posted August 16, 2016 You say he's president because he's black. Period. Got a wife, daughter, sister who has heard that they got their position because they are a woman? That's the demeaning argument you're making. You don't get the presidency by race, especially minority race. He worked hard, played politics, and rose. I never voted for him so I don't have to do your dance. He rose thanks in large part to his race. To deny this, again, is naive.
grinreaper Posted August 16, 2016 Posted August 16, 2016 You say he's president because he's black. Period. Got a wife, daughter, sister who has heard that they got their position because they are a woman? That's the demeaning argument you're making. You don't get the presidency by race, especially minority race. He worked hard, played politics, and rose. I never voted for him so I don't have to do your dance. Obama and Hillary are constantly playing the race and gender cards. Anytime someone disagrees with them they pull them out and get the left to agree with them and echo that sentiment. All one has to do is disagree with one of them and that person will be denigrated as a racist or as someone perpetuating the "war on women". Your posts here in this thread as they refer to LA's posts show that you've really mastered the fine art of being obtuse.
Azalin Posted August 16, 2016 Posted August 16, 2016 The extent Soros will go to push his agenda is very disturbing, even more outrageous is he gets away with it. But the Koch brothers are the evil ones.....
Recommended Posts