nodnarb Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 Go to buffalobills.com and tell me if you see a zillion implementation errors that indicate that the developer(s) tested on IE only. It's an unreadable mess. And firefox/mozilla are the most standards-compliant browsers on the market...so it's not "their fault". how some people get paid in this world is beyond me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 Go to buffalobills.com and tell me if you see a zillion implementation errors that indicate that the developer(s) tested on IE only. It's an unreadable mess. And firefox/mozilla are the most standards-compliant browsers on the market...so it's not "their fault". how some people get paid in this world is beyond me. 217175[/snapback] Looks fine to me (Mozilla 1.7.3). Make sure you have the latest version...? I know what you mean -- I've seen tons of sites that are "broken," but Buffalobills.com doesn't appear to be one of them (at least not on the front page). CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeG Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 looks fine to me too.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theesir Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 Mozzila 1.7- Looks fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 No problems for me, other than the ridiculous design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
udonkey Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 firefox 1.0 looks good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
34-78-83 Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 Firefox 0.9.1 ... looks fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millbank Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 mozilla 1.7.5 is fine also...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theNose76 Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 I downloaded Mozilla in late October last year - is there a newer version available on mozilla.com? I'm not sure what version I have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nodnarb Posted January 24, 2005 Author Share Posted January 24, 2005 Wow. I just figured it out. My fuggin zonealarm update is preventing some of the scripting and styles from downloading, so the layers can't be positioned properly. I turned off my firewall and bam, there it is. But why this didn't happen with IE is still very strange. Oy. Apologies in absentia to the BB.com developers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 I downloaded Mozilla in late October last year - is there a newer version available on mozilla.com? I'm not sure what version I have. 217198[/snapback] http://www.mozilla.org CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theNose76 Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 http://www.mozilla.org CW 217206[/snapback] Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eSJayDee Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 Well, it ain't right, but there's no serious errors. I'm using Firebird 0.7 (quite old) on Windoze Home XP if that's relevant. The main pic on the top left is garbage, the text is fine, but it's taking FOREVER for the rest of the pics to load (I've got a cable modem.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eSJayDee Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 My fuggin zonealarm update is preventing some of the scripting and styles from downloading I've been having intermittent DNS look up problems that are attributable to ZA as well. I heard that RoadRunner is offering some sort of other firewall that I might give it a try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pkwwjd Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 I just tried it with Firefox 1.0, and it is messed up. I have no idea what or why, but somethin's wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCBoston Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 The Bills Backers page doesn't work with Firefox 1.0. You can't select states from the dropdown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckeye Eric Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 firefox 1.0 looks good 217193[/snapback] Ditto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhooPig Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 I've been having intermittent DNS look up problems that are attributable to ZA as well.I heard that RoadRunner is offering some sort of other firewall that I might give it a try. 217267[/snapback] That's interesting. I've been having a ton of DNS resolving problems lately. I just installed Norton Firewall, but none of the more restrictive settings are on. I just assumed it was a problem with my ISP using a cache server that fugged up the DNS resolution or something. Is there a way to trace or check DNS problems in Windows XP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eSJayDee Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 Is there a way to trace or check DNS problems in Windows XP? Not that I know of, but then again I'm far from a Windoze expert. My problem was diagnosed by realtime/online help via RoadRunner. (disable ZoneAlarm & the problem went away.) I subsequently found others posts on a BBS from others suffering similar problems w/ ZoneAlarm. Conceivably, Norton could be doing the same thing i.e. being too restrictive on traffic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfanone Posted January 24, 2005 Share Posted January 24, 2005 Looks fine on my Mozilla. Maybe you have your setting set to anal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts