B-Large Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 There's maybe two or three here that agree with my political views, one of them might be mentally disabled (we all know who I speak of), there's very little point in me getting into actual discussion here, as I'd just be shouted down by an avalanche of dissenting views. If that means I shouldn't participate, then I suppose I won't. My apologies for wasting your time. Mods, feel free to shut down this thread and any of my posts within PPP. thats the primary reason to get involved.... life is too short to surround yourself and seek out other who drone on what you agree with. As for the Avalanche, you have to remember those views are from posters I firmly believe have strong homosexual tendencies.... very strong.... oh yeah, and stop being a such a kitty... we treat each other like **** here, its what we do.
Dante Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 (edited) It's only for amusement purposes that we compare Barry and Bush. Both are new world order type guys that view America as mere equal global citizens and not superior in system even though history says otherwise. They are puppets (my suspicion) of a larger global influence to bring the US back to the pack so to speak. Bush was for open borders, bailouts and a big spender even though common sense is contrary to those things. Bush no Einstein but he wasn't retarded either so why the poor decision making?. Obama's isn't particularly smart but I think he is clever. Much like a decent thief is clever. The thief knows how to cheat and skirt the system and has the advantage over his victim because the victim is busy in their day to day life. Not able to constantly guard against crime. Obama is effective in his criminal behavior because a large part of the population doesn't care or pay attention. Obviously the msm constantly protecting him help. The other difference is that Barry is a marxist ideologue who's MO is any means to a end. Edited June 19, 2014 by Dante
DC Tom Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 As for the Avalanche, you have to remember those views are from posters I firmly believe have strong homosexual tendencies.... very strong.... My wife disagrees, !@#$er... (Yes, my wife is female. Just realized that's no longer a given, this time and place.)
B-Large Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 My wife disagrees, !@#$er... (Yes, my wife is female. Just realized that's no longer a given, this time and place.) you have to be clear these days- went to my first lesbian wedding last weekend.... two dresses, threw me right off.
Dorkington Posted June 19, 2014 Author Posted June 19, 2014 thats the primary reason to get involved.... life is too short to surround yourself and seek out other who drone on what you agree with. As for the Avalanche, you have to remember those views are from posters I firmly believe have strong homosexual tendencies.... very strong.... oh yeah, and stop being a such a kitty... we treat each other like **** here, its what we do. I don't surround myself with those who agree with me. I spend a great deal of time reading the forums here. You, Tasker, etc are significantly more intelligent and educated than I am, so I need to take a back seat, shut up, and change my views on the world. Also, name calling is unnecessary, but I do like kitties, so I suppose that's not such a bad thing to be. Thank you for your patience, as I continue to learn right from wrong in the political forum.
DC Tom Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 Also, name calling is unnecessary, but I do like kitties, so I suppose that's not such a bad thing to be. Stick around. You'll learn in short order that it's sometimes extremely necessary.
OCinBuffalo Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 (edited) Thank you for your patience, as I continue to learn right from wrong in the political forum. Then you need to work on your learning. We don't do "right from wrong" here, unless John Adams/birdog are on another of their "Look! I'm more moral than you are!" contradiction in terms/casting of their values, as morals, crusades. No. We do smart vs. stupid here. We look for ways to identify stupid, being advanced by posters, for the specific purpose of calling them names! Name calling is the reward posters get for finding the stupid. Calling names, without finding stupid, is doing it wrong. Edited June 19, 2014 by OCinBuffalo
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 Then you need to work on your learning. We don't do "right from wrong" here, unless John Adams/birdog are on another of their "Look! I'm more moral than you are!" contradiction in terms/casting of their values, as morals, crusade. No. We do smart vs. stupid here. We look for ways to identify stupid, being advanced by posters, for the specific purpose of calling them names! Name calling is the reward posters get for finding the stupid. Calling names, without finding stupid, is doing it wrong. You voted for Bush twice I bet
B-Large Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 I don't surround myself with those who agree with me. I spend a great deal of time reading the forums here. You, Tasker, etc are significantly more intelligent and educated than I am, so I need to take a back seat, shut up, and change my views on the world. Also, name calling is unnecessary, but I do like kitties, so I suppose that's not such a bad thing to be. Thank you for your patience, as I continue to learn right from wrong in the political forum. are you drunk today?
TakeYouToTasker Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 (edited) I don't surround myself with those who agree with me. I spend a great deal of time reading the forums here. You, Tasker, etc are significantly more intelligent and educated than I am, so I need to take a back seat, shut up, and change my views on the world. Also, name calling is unnecessary, but I do like kitties, so I suppose that's not such a bad thing to be. Thank you for your patience, as I continue to learn right from wrong in the political forum. Oh, good grief. Enough already with this garbage. How much merit do ones beliefs really have, if they don't hold up to scrutiny? Why would one want to hold such beliefs? I've never understood that line of reasoning. Edited June 19, 2014 by TakeYouToTasker
B-Large Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 Oh, good grief. Enough already with this garbage. How much merit do ones beliefs really have, if they don't hold up to scrutiny? Why would one want to hold such beliefs? I've never understood that like of reasoning. Or if you're not willing to defend them.
OCinBuffalo Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 You voted for Bush twice I bet I voted 0 times for Bush. And, what a surprise, I say the word stupid....and it attracts gatorman.
DC Tom Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 And, what a surprise, I say the word stupid....and it attracts gatorman. Say it out loud three times, and he shows up at your house and drools on the carpet.
OCinBuffalo Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 Say it out loud three times, and he shows up at your house and drools on the carpet. Then I shall not. Not because I don't want to see gatorman. I don't mind hanging out with any Bills fan. No. Because my cleaner already hates me. Or, better stated, my cleaner loves finding new ways to bust my balls and/or yell at me.
3rdnlng Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 Then I shall not. Not because I don't want to see gatorman. I don't mind hanging out with any Bills fan. No. Because my cleaner already hates me. Or, better stated, my cleaner loves finding new ways to bust my balls and/or yell at me. Just Tasker her/his ass.
OCinBuffalo Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 Just Tasker her/his ass. No. I don't want to reinforce her behavior positively or negatively, because either will only result in more. This level is fine. Besides, it's usually funny.
Koko78 Posted June 19, 2014 Posted June 19, 2014 you have to be clear these days- went to my first lesbian wedding last weekend.... two dresses, threw me right off. So... is it proper etiquette to hit on the bridesmaids (or the groomsmen) at a lesbian wedding?
B-Large Posted June 20, 2014 Posted June 20, 2014 So... is it proper etiquette to hit on the bridesmaids (or the groomsmen) at a lesbian wedding? Same as any other wedding, hit on everything that moves.... in the end, a mouth is a mouth andf its all pink on the inside.
Koko78 Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 http://news.yahoo.com/u-poll-more-voters-see-obama-worst-president-122609810.html In a survey of 1,446 registered voters, 33 percent said Obama was the worst president since World War Two, while 28 percent pointed to his predecessor, George W. Bush, as the worst, the poll by Quinnipiac University found.
keepthefaith Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 So... is it proper etiquette to hit on the bridesmaids at a lesbian wedding? It's acceptable if your intent is to offer them the other experience, to show them what they are missing.
Recommended Posts