Randy Moss numbers were not all that

[Pete]

I cant beleive some clamor for Moss and others bash Eric Moulds

 

 

Moss in 2004 49 catches for 767 yards, 13 TDs

Moulds in 2004 88 catches for 1043 yards and 5 TDs

 

Moss also had the luxury of having Dante at QB who threw for over 4700 yards and 39 TDs

[ajzepp]

I cant beleive some clamor for Moss and others bash Eric Moulds

Moss in 2004 49 catches for 767 yards, 13 TDs

Moulds in 2004 88 catches for 1043 yards and 5 TDs

 

Moss also had the luxury of having Dante at QB who threw for over 4700 yards and 39 TDs

215847[/snapback]

Right on.......Moulds rules........and your point about the QB is well thought out and completely accurate

[DC Tom]

I cant beleive some clamor for Moss and others bash Eric Moulds

Moss in 2004 49 catches for 767 yards, 13 TDs

Moulds in 2004 88 catches for 1043 yards and 5 TDs

 

Moss also had the luxury of having Dante at QB who threw for over 4700 yards and 39 TDs

215847[/snapback]

 

Moss was out injured for a good number of games - six, as I dimly recall - and likely half-speed for as many more.

[Rico]

I cant beleive some clamor for Moss and others bash Eric Moulds

Moss in 2004 49 catches for 767 yards, 13 TDs

Moulds in 2004 88 catches for 1043 yards and 5 TDs

 

Moss also had the luxury of having Dante at QB who threw for over 4700 yards and 39 TDs

215847[/snapback]

But didn't Moss miss some games with an injury?

[KD in CA]

It's not about bashing Moulds, he's been a great player here. But Moss is a once in a generation talent. If the Bills had the chance to swap, they'd be crazy not to do it.

[gmac17]

I think Moss was officially out for 5 games, and another game he played like 2 plays. And as tom said, he was gimpy for a bunch of others, and he still was in the top 3 for td catches.

[crackur]

I think Moss was officially out for 5 games, and another game he played like 2 plays. And as tom said, he was gimpy for a bunch of others, and he still was in the top 3 for td catches.

215866[/snapback]

exactly and when he did come back he was still hurt but tried to take the pressure off the other wrs

 

I'd take moss.........although Im a EMO fan

 

how bout emo takes a great cut and we sign moss too lol

[ajzepp]

exactly and when he did come back he was still hurt but tried to take the pressure off the other wrs

 

I'd take moss.........although Im a EMO fan

 

how bout emo takes a great cut and we sign moss too lol 

215870[/snapback]

Wow, could you imagine Moulds, Evans, and Moss? Holy crap........even Bledsoe could probably do something with that group.

[Pete]

It's not about bashing Moulds, he's been a great player here.  But Moss is a once in a generation talent.  If the Bills had the chance to swap, they'd be crazy not to do it.

215861[/snapback]

I strongly disagree. Moss averages 82 catches a year for his career. Eric averages 78 catchs a year if you throw out his first two years. You might try and make the argument that Moss is more of a vertical threat. Their yards per catch are comprable though. Moss averages 15.9 yards a catch while Moulds averages 13.9 yards a catch. Moss catches lots more TDs then Eric but thats not all on Eric. Moss plays in a pass happy offense with a TD throwing machine at QB. Eric brings alot to the table which Moss does not. Moulds tougher. I remember watching Moss pull up on catchable ball against the Giants in the playoffs a few years back. Eric is a kickass blocker which Moss is not. Eric is much more physical. Eric is not a punkass headcase. I am not sure why people are so enamored with the !@#$ that is Randy Moss. I dont get it

[ajzepp]

I strongly disagree.  Moss averages 82 catches a year for his career.  Eric averages 78 catchs a year if you throw out his first two years.  You might try and make the argument that Moss is more of a vertical threat.  Their yards per catch are comprable though.  Moss averages 15.9 yards a catch while Moulds averages 13.9 yards a catch.  Moss catches lots more TDs then Eric but thats not all on Eric.  Moss plays in a pass happy offense with a TD throwing machine at QB.  Eric brings alot to the table which Moss does not.  Moulds tougher.  I remember watching Moss pull up on catchable ball against the Giants in the playoffs a few years back.  Eric is a kickass blocker which is not.  Eric is much more physical.  Eric is not a punkass headcase.  I am not sure why people are so enamored with the !@#$ that is Randy Moss.  I dont get it

215877[/snapback]

Mike Tice will flat out tell you, too, that their offense is literally designed around Moss.......we have never designed our offense in a similar manner around Eric.

[crackur]

however we did around him and PRICE together

[KD in CA]

I strongly disagree.  Moss averages 82 catches a year for his career.  Eric averages 78 catchs a year if you throw out his first two years.  You might try and make the argument that Moss is more of a vertical threat.  Their yards per catch are comprable though.  Moss averages 15.9 yards a catch while Moulds averages 13.9 yards a catch.  Moss catches lots more TDs then Eric but thats not all on Eric.  Moss plays in a pass happy offense with a TD throwing machine at QB.  Eric brings alot to the table which Moss does not.  Moulds tougher.  I remember watching Moss pull up on catchable ball against the Giants in the playoffs a few years back.  Eric is a kickass blocker which Moss is not.  Eric is much more physical.  Eric is not a punkass headcase.  I am not sure why people are so enamored with the !@#$ that is Randy Moss.  I dont get it

215877[/snapback]

 

I admit that Moss is a risk because he is a head case. But I think Dante is way overrated and Moss just makes him look good. How many of those TDs is it just a jump ball that Moss takes away from the other guy? I've always loved Moulds, but he is a second tier WR now and Moss is the most talented guy in the league.