BillsFan-4-Ever Posted May 7, 2014 Posted May 7, 2014 I am not going to argue your premise OC... but I also think you overstate her influence a bit. She's a political rock-star. Everybody knows who she is, and that will always translate into fund-raising dollars. Now, it seems widely expected that Republicans will clean up in November, but how useful will she be in 2016? As I recall, in the last presidential election, the Republican party felt the need to distance themselves from her, and others with similar political appeal. Correction She's a Ticking Bomb she's only a rock star to those enamored with her guns a blazing mentality.
DC Tom Posted May 7, 2014 Posted May 7, 2014 Correction She's a Ticking Bomb she's only a rock star to those enamored with her guns a blazing mentality. She's popular, draws a crowd, but provides nothing of substance or value. Sounds like a rock star to me.
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted May 8, 2014 Posted May 8, 2014 (edited) She's popular, draws a crowd, but provides nothing of substance or value. Sounds like a rock star to me. you got me there Edited May 8, 2014 by BillsFan-4-Ever
OCinBuffalo Posted May 9, 2014 Author Posted May 9, 2014 (edited) She's popular, draws a crowd, but provides nothing of substance or value. Sounds like a rock star to me. you got me there How much value and substance you think this Handel broad () has derived from Palin? Last time I checked a fat campaign account is rather "substantive". I believe we've had a recent SCOTUS decision or 2 about this? Something about a lot of leftists whining about campaign $? Oh well, it's leftists, which means you guys are probably right...nothing of value or substance being discussed. Edited May 9, 2014 by OCinBuffalo
Recommended Posts