BillsFan-4-Ever Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 I am not going to argue your premise OC... but I also think you overstate her influence a bit. She's a political rock-star. Everybody knows who she is, and that will always translate into fund-raising dollars. Now, it seems widely expected that Republicans will clean up in November, but how useful will she be in 2016? As I recall, in the last presidential election, the Republican party felt the need to distance themselves from her, and others with similar political appeal. Correction She's a Ticking Bomb she's only a rock star to those enamored with her guns a blazing mentality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 7, 2014 Share Posted May 7, 2014 Correction She's a Ticking Bomb she's only a rock star to those enamored with her guns a blazing mentality. She's popular, draws a crowd, but provides nothing of substance or value. Sounds like a rock star to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFan-4-Ever Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 (edited) She's popular, draws a crowd, but provides nothing of substance or value. Sounds like a rock star to me. you got me there Edited May 8, 2014 by BillsFan-4-Ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OCinBuffalo Posted May 9, 2014 Author Share Posted May 9, 2014 (edited) She's popular, draws a crowd, but provides nothing of substance or value. Sounds like a rock star to me. you got me there How much value and substance you think this Handel broad () has derived from Palin? Last time I checked a fat campaign account is rather "substantive". I believe we've had a recent SCOTUS decision or 2 about this? Something about a lot of leftists whining about campaign $? Oh well, it's leftists, which means you guys are probably right...nothing of value or substance being discussed. Edited May 9, 2014 by OCinBuffalo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts