This is what Sarah Palin does. LOL!

[OCinBuffalo]

First, before we even start, let me give some of you a preliminary , because I already know how tightly this will twist your panties.

 

Now, moving on, one ? has come up from time to time here: "What does Sarah Palin do?" Also, some of us have also asked: "What is the obession with Palin?" and "Why does Palin cause so much irrationality on the left?" and "Don't you idiots realize that the more you attack Palin, especially when you attack her personally, the more powerful she becomes?"

 

Well, here we have some answers to our questions: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/05/01/GA-Karen-Handel-Surges-from-Fifth-to-Virtual-Tie-for-First-in-After-Palin-Endorsement

 

Again: ...largely because this will probably produce even more leftist irrationality, so, of course: thread.start(panties, twist);

 

And, before you bother telling me that this is all because of the dumb comment/Palin's candidate got lucky, and nothing to do with Palin :

Two polls were taken in the weeks before Palin endorsed Handel. In one poll conducted for Channel 2 Action News, Perdue had 21% while Handel had 10%. In a SurveyUSA Poll, Perdue led with 29% while Handel had 10% in that poll as well.

 

Since Palin's endorsement, Handel was within the margin of error for second in an Insider Advantage Poll taken two weeks ago, gained a net of eight points in another Survey USA poll, and is essentially tied for first in the most recent Insider Advantage poll.

 

Handel campaign's first radio ad only featured Palin. And her first television ad prominently featured Palin as well.

please stop before you even start.

 

Now, once again, it doesn't matter what I think about Palin. But, more importantly for the leftists? Guess what? It doesn't matter what you think about Palin either. Shocking, I know, for all these serious leftist opinions to be, empircally, deemed: irrelevant. But, that is precisely what the facts indicate.

 

Sarah Palin. The woman who can and has motivated other women to vote her way. Perhaps that is the answer to "why do they hate Palin so much"? She's effective. She may be a lot of other things, and you may be able to prove some of them. However, you cannot disprove her effectiveness. Palin's results makes the entire left's mockery of her: irrelevant. Results: something the left has in very short supply for 2014, and even less for 2016.

 

Thus, that is what Sarah Palin does: political operator and formidable fundraiser. Make fun of her all you want, but, just like Liberace, she's the one doing the real laughing, at you.

 

I'm just happy to be along for the ride, observing Palin, and how easily she exposes the left's true feelings about women = "women can have and believe in whatever they want, as long as it's our thing, that works our way."

[Koko78]

She would make a great Chairbroad for the RNC. She can raise a ton of money for GOP candidates with minimal effort, she can highlight important issues for conservatives, and everything she says or does makes libtards go insane with rage.

[Deranged Rhino]

She would make a great Chairbroad ...

Edited May 2, 2014 by GreggyT

[OCinBuffalo]

She would make a great Chairbroad for the RNC. She can raise a ton of money for GOP candidates with minimal effort, she can highlight important issues for conservatives, and everything she says or does makes libtards go insane with rage.

Why not? She can always hire a political scientist(which it appears is who the Rs currently have) to do the technical stuff.

 

The last thing I heard Palin say "Waterboarding is how we baptise terrorists". That's sheer genius. It's just gold, and so many will never, ever, understand why....which makes it 10x more valuable, because the tactic is re-usable.

 

And, I would argue that the rage and insanity are already present in most libtards, it's just that Palin is very effective in drawing it out in it's most easily recognizable state. And "easily recognizable" is exactly what you want...when we are talking about motivating all women, both low-information and high, to vote.

 

An example of "easily recognizable": just the other day, I heard a guy say "Sarah Palin is a MILF...a Moron I'd Like to F". That was a great laugh for him and his two friends at the airport bar. But, for the 15/18 women I observed scattered around that bar, whose heads turned and eyes burned? November is coming, smart guy!

Edited May 2, 2014 by OCinBuffalo

[Buftex]

I am not going to argue your premise OC... but I also think you overstate her influence a bit. She's a political rock-star. Everybody knows who she is, and that will always translate into fund-raising dollars. Now, it seems widely expected that Republicans will clean up in November, but how useful will she be in 2016? As I recall, in the last presidential election, the Republican party felt the need to distance themselves from her, and others with similar political appeal.

[OCinBuffalo]

I am not going to argue your premise OC... but I also think you overstate her influence a bit. She's a political rock-star. Everybody knows who she is, and that will always translate into fund-raising dollars. Now, it seems widely expected that Republicans will clean up in November, but how useful will she be in 2016? As I recall, in the last presidential election, the Republican party felt the need to distance themselves from her, and others with similar political appeal.

Buftex? I see we've removed the self-ban on PPP?

 

How good for me. Let the Buftex beatings commence! I love it when people say "I'm not going to argue". That's like pretending that there's no difference between the meanings of the words "can't" and "won't". One merely substitutes "won't" for "can't", and expects get over using the false choice they've created. Buftex can't argue with my premise, not won't, because it is fact. Not a likable fact for some. Not a likable fact for some on the right. But, still...fact.

 

Only a fool, regardless of side, denigrates Sarah Palin. They could have used Sarah Palin in 2012. Huge mistake. In fact, the hindsight data says Palin had a strong shot to help turn things Romney's way. Romney lost because not enough white people showed up, especially not enough religious white people. Palin is the Queen of religious white women. N'est-ce pa?

 

I've explained in detail my theory of how the Palin machine, or really, organism, operates in the wild here many times. If we just look at the inputs/outputs: it feeds on negative personal attacks on both Palin and the Tea party, and schits campaign $ for conservative candidates. As the absurdity and # of these attacks increases incrementally, the campaign $ output increases exponentially. And still: liberals can't find the strength to STFU, and stop feeding the organism what it thrives on the most.

 

The hilariously ironic: the key mechanism in the organism, it's mitochondria, is surprisingly of militant leftist/feminist design. It is the left's Manichean construct of the "victimhood" and "plight" of ALL women in this country, that produces an unintended effect. ALL is the key. Since the left loves to speak in absolutes(they've learned nothing from Obi Wan), ALL includes Palin. Thus, Palin's "plight" becomes demonstrable to ALL women in this country, every time the left attacks her. It's as I said above: "easily recognizable", because the left has made it so. Without this key component that the feminazis have worked so diligently to embed in our collective consciousness, Sarah Palin would be a near nobody.

 

When you take the engineered mitochondria of this organism, and feed it near-misogyny in most cases, and very real("Someone should defecate in Palin's mouth") misogyny in others?

 

Well, it's not hard to see how the organism can become much more efficient, learn and adapt to its surroundings, because it has the energy to do so, and become very formidable indeed. It has progressed so well that it has ceased to be prey, and is now a predator.

Edited May 2, 2014 by OCinBuffalo

[Buftex]

Buftex? I see we've removed the self-ban on PPP?

 

How good for me. Let the Buftex beatings commence! I love it when people say "I'm not going to argue". That's like pretending that there's no difference between the meanings of the words "can't" and "won't". One merely substitutes "won't" for "can't", and expects get over using the false choice they've created. Buftex can't argue with my premise, not won't, because it is fact. Not a likable fact for some. Not a likable fact for some on the right. But, still...fact.

 

Only a fool, regardless of side, denigrates Sarah Palin. They could have used Sarah Palin in 2012. Huge mistake. In fact, the hindsight data says Palin had a strong shot to help turn things Romney's way. Romney lost because not enough white people showed up, especially not enough religious white people. Palin is the Queen of religious white women. N'est-ce pa?

 

I've explained in detail my theory of how the Palin machine, or really, organism, operates in the wild here many times. If we just look at the inputs/outputs: it feeds on negative personal attacks on both Palin and the Tea party, and schits campaign $ for conservative candidates. As the absurdity and # of these attacks increases incrementally, the campaign $ output increases exponentially. And still: liberals can't find the strength to STFU, and stop feeding the organism what it thrives on the most.

 

The hilariously ironic: the key mechanism in the organism, it's mitochondria, is surprisingly of militant leftist/feminist design. It is the left's Manichean construct of the "victimhood" and "plight" of ALL women in this country, that produces an unintended effect. ALL is the key. Since the left loves to speak in absolutes(they've learned nothing from Obi Wan), ALL includes Palin. Thus, Palin's "plight" becomes demonstrable to ALL women in this country, every time the left attacks her. It's as I said above: "easily recognizable", because the left has made it so. Without this key component that the feminazis have worked so diligently to embed in our collective consciousness, Sarah Palin would be a near nobody.

 

When you take the engineered mitochondria of this organism, and feed it near-misogyny in most cases, and very real("Someone should defecate in Palin's mouth") misogyny in others?

 

Well, it's not hard to see how the organism can become much more efficient, learn and adapt to its surroundings, because it has the energy to do so, and become very formidable indeed. It has progressed so well that it has ceased to be prey, and is now a predator.

 

No, I said I am not going to argue with your premise, because I agree with it... the only thing I am questioning is, ultimately, what does it do, other than raise money? I agree, people on the left have not been tacful at times in speaking of Palin... no argument from me on that. She has been great at fundraising for the candidates she endorses. No argument there. Many of them, if not all, of her endorsed candidates may be elected in November of 2014....follow me?

 

But ulitmately, just as you say Palin brings out the worst in liberals, the candidates she endorses and helps to get elected, quite often can't help but stick their feet in their mouths... more moderate Republicans are then forced to be "for or against" these people, they say stupid things they can't take back (or won't because they actually believe them), and in 2016 there is another swing away from these same candidates that were elected in the mid-terms. Remember how nobody thought Obama could get re-elected in 2012?

 

Was Mitt Romney a terrible candidate? Maybe, but I think it is more likely he was the candidate of a terribly divided party..and his effort to appeal to the Palin Republicans turned off not only undecided voters, but people in his own party. So, yes, Palin has all the powers you paint her to have...but she is no more in touch with mainstream America than the commie-socialist elite on the left. So, big deal...it is like getting high score on the pinball game down at the pizzeria..impressive, but ultimately meaningless. If eternal political grid-lock is the goal, then nicely done!

Edited May 2, 2014 by Buftex

[B-Large]

She combined human torture with a holy Christian sacrament. Impressive.

 

What torture and obidience to the command of Christ have in common, I gave no idea. As a Christian, I find that remake repugnant. But then again, Palin continues to prove who she is...

[DC Tom]

She combined human torture with a holy Christian sacrament. Impressive.

 

What torture and obidience to the command of Christ have in common, I gave no idea. As a Christian, I find that remake repugnant. But then again, Palin continues to prove who she is...

 

A religion that holds dear the iconography of a man being tortured to death and symbolically celebrates ritual cannibalism?

 

Mystifying. Truly.

[Gary M]

A religion that holds dear the iconography of a man being tortured to death and symbolically celebrates ritual cannibalism?

 

Mystifying. Truly.

 

If you truly believe, It's not symbolic!!

[Deranged Rhino]

If you truly believe, It's not symbolic!!

So... then it's actual cannibalism?

[DC Tom]

So... then it's actual cannibalism?

 

Only in a Heinlein book.

[Deranged Rhino]

Only in a Heinlein book.

:lol:

[DC Tom]

:lol:

 

It always amazed me people thought that was controversial. Did they TOTALLY miss his point?

[Deranged Rhino]

It always amazed me people thought that was controversial. Did they TOTALLY miss his point?

Well, you know how people are. They' re ____

[Azalin]

It always amazed me people thought that was controversial. Did they TOTALLY miss his point?

never trust anyone completely covered in tattoos?

[DC Tom]

never trust anyone completely covered in tattoos?

 

I think you got that backwards. The circus folk joined Michael, didn't they?

 

That's the real message: blessed be the carnies.

[Azalin]

That's the real message: blessed be the carnies.

 

what can I say.....it's been years since I read that book, but the image of an old lady completely covered in ink is still vivid in my memory.

 

 

that probably sheds an uncomfortable amount of light on one of my not-quite-so subconsious preoccupations.

[OCinBuffalo]

But ulitmately, just as you say Palin brings out the worst in liberals, the candidates she endorses and helps to get elected,

I cut it there, because, that is all that matters. Whenever the left gets done talking, the results beat them every time.

 

Consider: if the goal for the left is to win, then, the opposite of "get elected" is what they want. They, as per normal, choose this opposite.

 

They choose it because they have based their view on a fundamental contradiction, and rather than copping to it, they do everything they can to avoid admitting that this: "women can have and believe in whatever they want, as long as it's our thing, that works our way."

 

is how they really feel about women. Women are merely a means to an end. For the left, they are merely an unregulated currency market, and that means they can say all sorts of retarded crap, get the return they want, and never have to worry about being held accountable.

 

What confounds the left: Palin has learned to play the same market. You can call her phony, pandering, etc. But, if you want to call Sarah Palin names/accuse her of pandering to the worst sort of people on the right? Then, whether you like it or not, you must be accept that as the very definition of the pandering lefist activity with the worst sort of people on the left. You've defined the rules of the game, now you have to live with them.

 

That's all this is: Palin has become better than the pandering left at their own game. Why should anybody care if they are being beaten at it?

[OCinBuffalo]

She combined human torture with a holy Christian sacrament. Impressive.

 

What torture and obidience to the command of Christ have in common, I gave no idea. As a Christian, I find that remake repugnant. But then again, Palin continues to prove who she is...

No. Simple, yet effective. Impressive would be a bad fit. Impressive is what Romney tried to do. Get it?

 

You are exactly the type of poster that doesn't see....largely because you choose not to. You have a pre-disposition towards not seeing, and you expect your deficiency to be regarded by us as....what exactly?

 

"Waterboarding is how we baptie terrorists" is genius. It is the type of thing I've recently come to expect from Sarah Palin.

 

And, what's more? You don't get to be offended. Sorry, but, you cashed in those chips over the last couple of elections. When you and the rest of the clowns were howling about waterboarding...as though Bush invented it, and then directly ordered it carried out?

 

Yeah...you made that political, and no longer a legitimate policy question.

 

Now? Palin throws the very thing you CHOSE to make political, back in your face. She's dunking it on you, and you have no legitimate claim to being offended by it. If you wanted to retain "decency" as an tenet of your position/existence?

 

You should have begun your entire approach to the policy question of waterboarding....with decency.

 

As such, your offense, being a Christian or otherwise, is laughable.

Edited May 7, 2014 by OCinBuffalo