YoloinOhio Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 I thought this was interesting... discusses a 4-3 "Under" base scheme based on personnel from 2013 and FA additions http://forgedinbuffalo.com/media/sports/jim-schwartz-defense-buffalo-bills-offseason-additions-hint-4-3-fronts/
thebandit27 Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 It's a good effort; he's off in several of his definitions though...there's a bit more detailed look from former NFL safety Matt Bowen on Bleacher Report. Just Google "Matt Bowen Football 101 Basics of 4-3 Front"
YoloinOhio Posted April 24, 2014 Author Posted April 24, 2014 It's a good effort; he's off in several of his definitions though...there's a bit more detailed look from former NFL safety Matt Bowen on Bleacher Report. Just Google "Matt Bowen Football 101 Basics of 4-3 Front" Thanks - that helps.
Luxy312 Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 I thought this was interesting... discusses a 4-3 "Under" base scheme based on personnel from 2013 and FA additions http://forgedinbuffa...int-4-3-fronts/ Very good read indeed. Thanks!
Cash Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 Very good read, thanks for posting! My main quibble with the author's breakdown is that from the way Whaley was talking about the Rivers signing, it doesn't seem like Lawson has much of a place in this scheme.
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 Thanks for sharing you guys! Good reads.
John from Riverside Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 Lawson can actually drop back and cover.....since that is a weakness to the scheme Lawson definately has a place
YoloinOhio Posted April 24, 2014 Author Posted April 24, 2014 Very good read, thanks for posting! My main quibble with the author's breakdown is that from the way Whaley was talking about the Rivers signing, it doesn't seem like Lawson has much of a place in this scheme. http://www.buffalorumblings.com/buffalo-bills-analysis-all-22/2014/3/20/5529460/bills-needs-list-de-manny-lawson-jerry-hughes
Security Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 Hilarious calling Kyle Williams dominant. He gets dominated almost all game long except for guessing right a few times. He is too small and has been the anchor of the worst team in football stopping the run over the 8 years he has been a Buffalo Bills player. They would better by cutting him. Addition by Subtraction.
FluffHead Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 Hilarious calling Kyle Williams dominant. He gets dominated almost all game long except for guessing right a few times. He is too small and has been the anchor of the worst team in football stopping the run over the 8 years he has been a Buffalo Bills player. They would better by cutting him. Addition by Subtraction. So that's how you get voted to the pro bowl by your peers...interesting
K-9 Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 So that's how you get voted to the pro bowl by your peers...interesting That's not nearly as impressive as being named to the Pro Bowl by the coaches, which he has been. I honestly don't think people watch the games that closely. GO BILLS!!!
Rockinon Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 (edited) Kyle Williams is over 300Lbs and gets lower than nearly every DLman in the NFL. He is quick and he gets better leverage than his opponent on nearly every play. Security, you listen too much to the ramblings of TBD posters. He doesn't need to be bigger because he absolutely does dominate at that position. Having a 10 sack season at as a defensive tackle is a far cry from "gets dominated almost all game long except for guessing right a few times". You crack me up. Edited April 24, 2014 by Rockinon
Security Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 (edited) So that's how you get voted to the pro bowl by your peers...interesting He actually sucks, he gets Ruben Brown love. IT is silly to even think he is serviceable. Rank against the run: 2013 - 28th 2012 - 32nd 2011 - 27th --> Kyle WIlliams only played in 5 games this year, funny how the best in the last 4 years was when he was not playing 2010 - 32nd Also, in 2011, the Bills averaged 138.4 per game with him, 139.2 without him. He has no impact at all . They actually had 2 games without him where let up less than 100 yards that year, and then numbers got drastically inflated by a 254 yard game at the end of the year when the Bills gave up. It is clear they were better without him. Edited April 24, 2014 by Security
FireChan Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 That's not nearly as impressive as being named to the Pro Bowl by the coaches, which he has been. I honestly don't think people watch the games that closely. GO BILLS!!! Doesn't Bill Belicheck have a healthy respect for KW over the rest of the D?
Johnny Hammersticks Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 He actually sucks, he gets Ruben Brown love. IT is silly to even think he is serviceable. Rank against the run: 2013 - 28th 2012 - 32nd 2011 - 27th --> Kyle WIlliams only played in 5 games this year, funny how the best in the last 4 years was when he was not playing 2010 - 32nd Also, in 2011, the Bills averaged 138.4 per game with him, 139.2 without him. He has no impact at all . They actually had 2 games without him where let up less than 100 yards that year, and then numbers got drastically inflated by a 254 yard game at the end of the year when the Bills gave up. It is clear they were better without him. He actually sucks, he gets Ruben Brown love. IT is silly to even think he is serviceable. Rank against the run: 2013 - 28th 2012 - 32nd 2011 - 27th --> Kyle WIlliams only played in 5 games this year, funny how the best in the last 4 years was when he was not playing 2010 - 32nd Also, in 2011, the Bills averaged 138.4 per game with him, 139.2 without him. He has no impact at all . They actually had 2 games without him where let up less than 100 yards that year, and then numbers got drastically inflated by a 254 yard game at the end of the year when the Bills gave up. It is clear they were better without him. Wow, you are citing team statistics to judge the performance of an individual player? I could be mistaken, but wasn't he one of the top ranked DT's based on PFF's metrics?
FluffHead Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 Wow, you are citing team statistics to judge the performance of an individual player? I could be mistaken, but wasn't he one of the top ranked DT's based on PFF's metrics? He was their NFL defensive player of the year back in Chan's first season as well.
Security Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 He was their NFL defensive player of the year back in Chan's first season as well. Poor choice if he was, he is an average player. It is clear he has no impact at all. Stats don't lie, with or without him. He has no added value at all. There is no way to show he makes the Bills better. Not one way. He is classic, hard to play against, but easy to beat type of player.
FluffHead Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 Poor choice if he was, he is an average player. It is clear he has no impact at all. Stats don't lie, with or without him. He has no added value at all. There is no way to show he makes the Bills better. Not one way. He is classic, hard to play against, but easy to beat type of player. Let me guess, you were peering through the window when his dog pooped on your lawn and he didn't clean it up.
Recommended Posts