Jump to content

Eric Holder Is Not Colorblind


Recommended Posts

SCOTUS rules on affirmative action case out of Michigan:

 

 

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/204162-holder-sotomayors-affirmative-action-dissent-was-courageous

 

Holder's philosophy in a nutshell:

 

“Affirmative action has been an issue since segregation practices,” Holder said. “The question is not when does it end, but when does it begin. ... When do people of color truly get the benefits to which they are entitled?”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.

So help me God."

 

 

 

It seems pretty straightfoward Mr. Holder.

 

 

.

 

 

 

.

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure that it's true; he's not colorblind. Traffic signals likely pose no challenge for him.

 

Unfortunately for the rest of us, he's just a straight-up racist who just happens to be completely incompetent at his job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SCOTUS rules on affirmative action case out of Michigan:

 

 

http://thehill.com/b...-was-courageous

 

Holder's philosophy in a nutshell:

 

“Affirmative action has been an issue since segregation practices,” Holder said. “The question is not when does it end, but when does it begin. ... When do people of color truly get the benefits to which they are entitled?”

 

Can't believe Holder's gonna leave us all hanging on this. I wish he would have told us what are the benefits that people of color should be getting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SCOTUS rules on affirmative action case out of Michigan:

 

 

http://thehill.com/b...-was-courageous

 

Holder's philosophy in a nutshell:

 

“Affirmative action has been an issue since segregation practices,” Holder said. “The question is not when does it end, but when does it begin. ... When do people of color truly get the benefits to which they are entitled?”

 

When do I get my 40 acres and a mule?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SCOTUS rules on affirmative action case out of Michigan:

 

 

http://thehill.com/b...-was-courageous

 

Holder's philosophy in a nutshell:

 

“Affirmative action has been an issue since segregation practices,” Holder said. “The question is not when does it end, but when does it begin. ... When do people of color truly get the benefits to which they are entitled?”

 

At least he said "people of color" rather than "black and brown boys." Anytime I hear that phrase I know I'm listening to a self-righteous blow hard. It makes me just !@#$ing cringe. Nails on the chalkboard, man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how the historic disadvantages blacks have suffered from slavery, segrgation and discrimination should be addressed, but those disadvantages are real. Slavery was not good training for a free society and neither was segregation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how the historic disadvantages blacks have suffered from slavery, segrgation and discrimination should be addressed, but those disadvantages are real. Slavery was not good training for a free society and neither was segregation

 

Are you playing one of those games that make you put together a sentence from random words?

 

It's time to quit playing the blame game. It's been 150 years, more than enough time to overcome what their great-great-great-great-great granpappy had to endure.

Edited by 3rdnlng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you playing one of those games that make you put together a sentence from random words?

 

It's time to quit playing the blame game. It's been 150 years, more than enough time to overcome what their great-great-great-great-great granpappy had to endure.

Just ask the Irish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another Day, Another Obama DOJ Attempt to Politicize and Racialize Criminal Justice

 

By Heather Mac Donald

 

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced today that the Justice Department would start collecting racial data on police stops and arrests. The effort is part of the Obama administration’s war on phantom racism, a colossal waste of taxpayer resources and a depressing diversion from the real problems affecting black and Hispanic populations.

 

According to the NAACP, the ACLU, and now, the Justice Department, the fact that the police stop and arrest blacks and Hispanics at higher rates than whites demonstrates police racism. The Justice Department’s press release, like all such anti-cop propaganda, assiduously ignores the crucial fact that blacks and Hispanics commit crime at much higher rates than whites as well. Black males between the ages of 14 and 17, for example, commit homicide at ten times the rate of whites and Hispanics combined; if Hispanics were taken out of the equation (which federal data makes it difficult to do), the disparity between the white and black homicide rates would be even higher. Given such racial disparities in crime rates, the police cannot fight lawlessness without producing disproportionate stop and arrest figures.

 

Holder fingered as bigots not just the police, but the entire criminal-justice system as well:

 

A recent study, [Holder said], reported that half of African-American men have been arrested at least once by age 23. Overall, black men were 6 times, and Latino men were 2.5 times, more likely to be imprisoned than white men in 2012

This overrepresentation of young men of color in our criminal justice system is a problem we must confront—not only as an issue of individual responsibility but also as one of fundamental fairness, and as an issue of effective law enforcement. Racial disparities contribute to tension in our nation generally and within communities of color specifically, and tend to breed resentment towards law enforcement that is counterproductive to the goal of reducing crime.

 

Criminologists have spent decades trying to prove that the overrepresentation of blacks and Hispanic in prison demonstrates that the criminal justice system is racist. And each time they fail. Even the most left-wing academics have been forced to admit that crime, not race, determines criminal justice outcomes.

 

 

 

 

More at the link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...