CodeMonkey Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 I love hockey (loved it more as a kid) but it is Rosie O'Donell to the NFL's Kate Upton. More like a Buffalo Jill to Kate Upton. And do you take the Jill that is a sure thing or Kate that is an extreme long shot at best ?
C.Biscuit97 Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 More like a Buffalo Jill to Kate Upton. And do you take the Jill that is a sure thing or Kate that is an extreme long shot at best ? I just gotta meet Kate. Then, I'd tell her she needed to lose a couple of lbs and she'd be all over me.
Not at the table Karlos Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 I love hockey (loved it more as a kid) but it is Rosie O'Donell to the NFL's Kate Upton. I understand that. What he was saying is if jacobs wanted the bills he would have sold the bruins after their championship. I said that wouldnt make sense because the bills werent for sale then. Why would he sell and then wait for someone to die to try and buy another team.
Kirby Jackson Posted April 24, 2014 Author Posted April 24, 2014 I understand that. What he was saying is if jacobs wanted the bills he would have sold the bruins after their championship. I said that wouldnt make sense because the bills werent for sale then. Why would he sell and then wait for someone to die to try and buy another team. He doesn't really have to sell the Bruins. His kids need to control 1 team and he needs to control the other. It is what Kroenke did.
yungmack Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 the rooney family owns racetracks so i don't think the casino thing is that big of a deal. Do any of the casinos offer sports betting or are they just table games and slotS? The original NFL ownership was loaded with "questionable" characters, many who had ties to gambling, bookmaking and, not surprisingly, to the nascent organized crime families. The Rooney and Mara families were both heavily involved in all aspects of what is now known as "the gaming industry." I don't know if anyone has written a comprehensive book about this aspect of the early league. JW, get crackin'!
billsfan_34 Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 The Bruins would likely be a stumbling block. It would be hard to trade a franchise like that for the Bills. The most elite team in the NHL doesnt even compare to an NFL team, no matter which one, period.
zonabb Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 The most elite team in the NHL doesnt even compare to an NFL team, no matter which one, period. Compare how or by what measure? Popularity, probably not. By winning the Bills aren't in the same ballpark given their absence of a title in their sport. By legendary, transcendent players, who do the Bills have to compare to Bobby Orr, the greatest defenseman of all time? No one. Reggie White was better than Bruce Smith. Barry Sanders and Emmitt Smith were better than OJ or Thurman. 10 guys are better than Andre and Bruce and Kent Hull and fill in the blank. By money/profit? I don't have the figures on profit since no one offers that up but I'd be willing to bet that the Jacob's family makes more on the Bruins than the Bills make. That market size is huge and basically everyone in Mass, NH and Maine are Bruins fans, they sell tons of gear, tickets are expensive, boxes are sold out, and they own the concessions. I'd rather be the Bruins owner than the Bills owner.... winning AND profit, what a novel idea. Sorry but if I was cognizant as a newborn in the 70s and my parents were able to see the future and said "Here are the Bruins and Bills and their futures, pick one to root for" I'd pick the Bruins. Winning matters no matter what sport. The NFL has become an overblown hype machine, more shine than substance. Sure we all like it but just because its big and popular doesn't diminish other sports and their franchises. Not sure when a Stanley Cup and the NHL became amateurs in the minds of myopic NFL fans but that's a laughable proposition. And I'm not even an NHL fan, I just find this line of thinking short sighted.
Kirby Jackson Posted April 24, 2014 Author Posted April 24, 2014 Compare how or by what measure? Popularity, probably not. By winning the Bills aren't in the same ballpark given their absence of a title in their sport. By legendary, transcendent players, who do the Bills have to compare to Bobby Orr, the greatest defenseman of all time? No one. Reggie White was better than Bruce Smith. Barry Sanders and Emmitt Smith were better than OJ or Thurman. 10 guys are better than Andre and Bruce and Kent Hull and fill in the blank. By money/profit? I don't have the figures on profit since no one offers that up but I'd be willing to bet that the Jacob's family makes more on the Bruins than the Bills make. That market size is huge and basically everyone in Mass, NH and Maine are Bruins fans, they sell tons of gear, tickets are expensive, boxes are sold out, and they own the concessions. I'd rather be the Bruins owner than the Bills owner.... winning AND profit, what a novel idea. Sorry but if I was cognizant as a newborn in the 70s and my parents were able to see the future and said "Here are the Bruins and Bills and their futures, pick one to root for" I'd pick the Bruins. Winning matters no matter what sport. The NFL has become an overblown hype machine, more shine than substance. Sure we all like it but just because its big and popular doesn't diminish other sports and their franchises. Not sure when a Stanley Cup and the NHL became amateurs in the minds of myopic NFL fans but that's a laughable proposition. And I'm not even an NHL fan, I just find this line of thinking short sighted. No offense but you lost me on the revenue part. They are not even comparable when it comes to revenue and value.
bbb Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 No offense but you lost me on the revenue part. They are not even comparable when it comes to revenue and value. He lost me when he said that Emmitt Smith was better than OJ.
C.Biscuit97 Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 Compare how or by what measure? Popularity, probably not. By winning the Bills aren't in the same ballpark given their absence of a title in their sport. By legendary, transcendent players, who do the Bills have to compare to Bobby Orr, the greatest defenseman of all time? No one. Reggie White was better than Bruce Smith. Barry Sanders and Emmitt Smith were better than OJ or Thurman. 10 guys are better than Andre and Bruce and Kent Hull and fill in the blank. By money/profit? I don't have the figures on profit since no one offers that up but I'd be willing to bet that the Jacob's family makes more on the Bruins than the Bills make. That market size is huge and basically everyone in Mass, NH and Maine are Bruins fans, they sell tons of gear, tickets are expensive, boxes are sold out, and they own the concessions. I'd rather be the Bruins owner than the Bills owner.... winning AND profit, what a novel idea. Sorry but if I was cognizant as a newborn in the 70s and my parents were able to see the future and said "Here are the Bruins and Bills and their futures, pick one to root for" I'd pick the Bruins. Winning matters no matter what sport. The NFL has become an overblown hype machine, more shine than substance. Sure we all like it but just because its big and popular doesn't diminish other sports and their franchises. Not sure when a Stanley Cup and the NHL became amateurs in the minds of myopic NFL fans but that's a laughable proposition. And I'm not even an NHL fan, I just find this line of thinking short sighted. hockey is a great sport but it's maybe 5th in the pecking order (golf might be more popular). It just isn't in the same ballplark. The Bills have sucked for years, yet they are still a much more valuable franchise than the Stanley Cup winner. It's just facts.
BringBackFergy Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 The original NFL ownership was loaded with "questionable" characters, many who had ties to gambling, bookmaking and, not surprisingly, to the nascent organized crime families. The Rooney and Mara families were both heavily involved in all aspects of what is now known as "the gaming industry." I don't know if anyone has written a comprehensive book about this aspect of the early league. JW, get crackin'! #Haslam
bbb Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 Compare how or by what measure? Popularity, probably not. By winning the Bills aren't in the same ballpark given their absence of a title in their sport. By legendary, transcendent players, who do the Bills have to compare to Bobby Orr, the greatest defenseman of all time? No one. Reggie White was better than Bruce Smith. Barry Sanders and Emmitt Smith were better than OJ or Thurman. 10 guys are better than Andre and Bruce and Kent Hull and fill in the blank. By money/profit? I don't have the figures on profit since no one offers that up but I'd be willing to bet that the Jacob's family makes more on the Bruins than the Bills make. That market size is huge and basically everyone in Mass, NH and Maine are Bruins fans, they sell tons of gear, tickets are expensive, boxes are sold out, and they own the concessions. I'd rather be the Bruins owner than the Bills owner.... winning AND profit, what a novel idea. Sorry but if I was cognizant as a newborn in the 70s and my parents were able to see the future and said "Here are the Bruins and Bills and their futures, pick one to root for" I'd pick the Bruins. Winning matters no matter what sport. The NFL has become an overblown hype machine, more shine than substance. Sure we all like it but just because its big and popular doesn't diminish other sports and their franchises. Not sure when a Stanley Cup and the NHL became amateurs in the minds of myopic NFL fans but that's a laughable proposition. And I'm not even an NHL fan, I just find this line of thinking short sighted. I think you were attacking the Buffalo economy a few days ago. If this is an example of your analyses skills, I feel bullish on Buffalo.
CodeMonkey Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 (edited) hockey is a great sport but it's maybe 5th in the pecking order (golf might be more popular). It just isn't in the same ballplark. The Bills have sucked for years, yet they are still a much more valuable franchise than the Stanley Cup winner. It's just facts. Hmmm. I'd like to see the bottom line for the new Bills owner after a few years and compare to the Bruins, Habs, Pens, or Leafs owners during the same time. I suspect the TV contract would make even the Bills more profitable overall. But if you took away TV contracts, the NHL would survive. Do that to the NFL and it would collapse within one year. Plus the cost of a NFL franchise is about 4 times a NHL one. Which is the more viable? I'm not sure. Edited April 24, 2014 by CodeMonkey
gumby Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 (edited) According to Forbes the Bills are worth $870 M. The Bruins are valued at $600 M. Yes the Bills are worth more but not nearly as much as some on here would have you believe. Edited April 24, 2014 by gumby
Kirby Jackson Posted April 24, 2014 Author Posted April 24, 2014 Hmmm. I'd like to see the bottom line for the new Bills owner after a few years and compare to the Bruins, Habs, Pens, or Leafs owners during the same time. I suspect the TV contract would make even the Bills more profitable overall. But if you took away TV contracts, the NHL would survive. Do that to the NFL and it would collapse within one year. Plus the cost of a NFL franchise is about 4 times a NHL one. Which is the more viable? I'm not sure. It really isn't all that close. The Bills annual profit is probably comparable to the Bruins gross. The Bills net that I heard yesterday (not sure how accurate it was) was higher than the gross of the NBA team that I worked for. With that being said the two are in different worlds. The Bruins are valued at about $600M & the Bills at $875M. The sale of the team will almost certainly eclipse $1B.
sodbuster Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 According to Forbes the Bills are worth $870 M. The Bruins are valued at $600 M. Yes the Bills are worth more but not nearly as much as some on here would have you believe. yeah but the bruins are at the top of their game right now. The bills are at the bottom of theirs tight now.
CodeMonkey Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 Ahhh. I was judging it on what Pegula paid for the Sabres. I didn't realize how much of a bargain he got
BillnutinHouston Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 One random thought: we are VERY lucky to have Chuck Schumer on our side. That guy is a power broker in Washington and not a guy whose bad side the NFL wants to be on. You raise a great point, but with all due respect I think you have framed it wrong. There is no LUCK involved with Schumer's participation in this effort. He's involved because the Bills, not the County or NYS, added him as a Committee member. Think about that. Does that not speak volumes about Mary Wilson's intentions going forward? It actually tells all. Thank you again Mr. and Mrs. Wilson!
Bob Malooga Posted April 24, 2014 Posted April 24, 2014 (edited) Haven't seen the Wegmans' name mentioned anywhere...don't they have the available assets to make a run also? No, I know Danny Wegman personally. He lives in my hometown in the Finger Lakes. (I grew up with his stepson.) While being "loaded/rich," he does not have the resources or assets to be able to purchase an NFL team. Minority owner, maybe...majority owner, not a chance. (He does have an incredible house though...heated driveways and tennis courts, a guest house the size of a normal house, state of the art security room, a dozen+ docks for boats/jet skis...he basically has his own little cove on the lake...it is truly something amazing to see from a boat.) (His stepson used to show us pictures of their trips to Jamaica and other awesome vacation spots...where they partied with the likes of Ralph Lauren, Michael Jordan, Jay-Z and many more celebrities. He is close to Jim Kelly and Thurman Thomas too, I know that for a fact.) *One more thing...my brother-in-law is a big-wig at Paychex, and he said Golisano is "intrigued." (Just a thought.) Edited April 24, 2014 by Bob Malooga
Recommended Posts