oman128 Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 (edited) The Bills are very very weak when it comes to Offensive Tackle. Cordy Glenn is a stud we all know that, he is an Pro Bowler in the making. However, behind him we have 3 guys. Pears who had a bad year and everyone seems to want the Bills to release. Hairston who didn't play last season for some unknown injury. Edawn Coughman who I think just got off the bus in Buffalo and the Bills are trying to make him a depth player. That's it we have no other bodies on the depth chart. Now who plays LT if Cordy gets hurt ? Quick Some one call John Fina see if he is available. The Bills need to draft one of the 3 big named ( Robinson, Matthews or Lewan) O.T in Round 1, they also need to add a veteran depth player who can swing both ways at tackle. Edited April 4, 2014 by oman128 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
filthymcnasty08 Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 With the Williams trade, its going to be TE1/OT2 or OT1/TE 2 Jake Matthews would be a gift to us at 9. Wouldn't be upset with Lewan at 9 either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maryland-bills-fan Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 Yes. The Bills will trade down and either take a legit ROT in the first (Zack Martin ~ #25 or so) or one with their 2nd round pick (A Richardson, or Moses). Also somebody in the 3rd or 4th round. It does not make sense to draft somebody in the first 15 picks who expects to get the big bucks for a LOT and pay him a ROT salary. The highest paid ROT gets paid the same as the 13th LOT. Ignore that and you are building a problem into your team for the intermediate future (rookie contracts are for 5 years) or earlier (al.la. J.Peters or J.Byrd). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPS Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 Yes. The Bills will trade down and either take a legit ROT in the first (Zack Martin ~ #25 or so) or one with their 2nd round pick (A Richardson, or Moses). Also somebody in the 3rd or 4th round. It does not make sense to draft somebody in the first 15 picks who expects to get the big bucks for a LOT and pay him a ROT salary. The highest paid ROT gets paid the same as the 13th LOT. Ignore that and you are building a problem into your team for the intermediate future (rookie contracts are for 5 years) or earlier (al.la. J.Peters or J.Byrd). That was my thinking too, they are set up to trade back. I think they could even do a swap with Cleveland's pick at 26(?). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bufcomments Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 They need to take OT first round period. Then take another in the 4th round that can play both G and OT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flutie7Flakes Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 With the Williams trade, its going to be TE1/OT2 or OT1/TE 2 Completely agree. The only other scenario would be if a suitor in the Top 5 is willing to trade with us, in the instance that Mack or Clowney slide... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Formerly Allan in MD Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 First round pick better be one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kellyto83TD Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 Ugh ok again the draft is Deeeeeeep with O Linemen this year. a starter at RT can be found in the 3rd round of the draft. Odds are that is the Bills plan, draft one later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herb62 Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 The more I think about it, we need mathews or Lewan, I not a we need to move Cordy to the right side guy, my thought is if Cordy is hurt either of these two can move to the left and we can survive with a hopefully some dip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 build the line! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klos63 Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 Yes. The Bills will trade down and either take a legit ROT in the first (Zack Martin ~ #25 or so) or one with their 2nd round pick (A Richardson, or Moses). Also somebody in the 3rd or 4th round. It does not make sense to draft somebody in the first 15 picks who expects to get the big bucks for a LOT and pay him a ROT salary. The highest paid ROT gets paid the same as the 13th LOT. Ignore that and you are building a problem into your team for the intermediate future (rookie contracts are for 5 years) or earlier (al.la. J.Peters or J.Byrd). If we need a tackle, why not draft a great one. It's an important position and we won't have to worry about the huge contract for 4-5 years. Doesn't make sense to wait a few rounds if a stud is there at #9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Cain Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 Build the line just like New England has done since Bill Belichick took over. I have always equated rushing touchdowns & sacks allowed as a true measure of the quality of an offensive line. Since 2000.... New England leads the NFL in rush touchdowns with 231, we only have 155 ranked #27. Since 2000 we have allowed the #3 most sacks 583, New England is #25 at 449. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckywarriors Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 QB sacks = QB Brady vs the bills revolving door of bad QB's. So it is not all there offensive line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 I am really not understanding the people that dont want a OT at 9 because it would mean say good bye to Glenn... Really? So when we had Will WOlford....I guess we better never try and get Howard Ballard? How about we draft Lewan......and then PAY Glenn....and have our bookend OT's for the forseeable future. Then if god forbids and we have an injury the team doesnt fall apart? To me the wild card in this has always been Hairston....who I FIRMLY believe would have been a very good ROT before he got the mysterious injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatszel Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 That was my thinking too, they are set up to trade back. I think they could even do a swap with Cleveland's pick at 26(?). I think Cleveland will be a good trade partner. They will get their QB at 9 is my guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffalothruMyVeins Posted April 5, 2014 Share Posted April 5, 2014 (edited) 2 weeks ago, I felt like MLB was a pretty big hole on the team... Then we signed Spikes. Then I've been thinking we go WR at 9, with Evans... Now we trade for Williams. Our weaknesses are really becoming a strength before the draft even arrives. This is shaping up for a very BPS draft, but am still not off of Evans at #9. Whatever it is, I feel like this will be a Very interesting draft, including possible trade and going after a surprise player early that is at a position we don't think is a need, but is a BPA pick. Like a 2nd round RB, or first round LBer. Or a TE at 9. Edited April 5, 2014 by BuffalothruMyVeins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CSBill Posted April 5, 2014 Share Posted April 5, 2014 Two things . . . 1) O-lineman are the safest bet in round one 2) No team has ever regretted building a strong (elite) offense lineman I say draft one of the big-three tackles, and 2 or 3 more solid o-lineman in the rest of the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klos63 Posted April 5, 2014 Share Posted April 5, 2014 Two things . . . 1) O-lineman are the safest bet in round one 2) No team has ever regretted building a strong (elite) offense lineman I say draft one of the big-three tackles, and 2 or 3 more solid o-lineman in the rest of the draft Exactly, with a dominant line, you can dictate the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dean Cain Posted April 5, 2014 Share Posted April 5, 2014 QB sacks = QB Brady vs the bills revolving door of bad QB's. So it is not all there offensive line. Ok, I'll concede Brady helping lower the QB sack total. But look at Indy only 315 sacks allowed since 2000. Peyton Manning obviously helped that total, no? Taking QB outs of the equation, did you really think New England would be #1 in rush TDs since 2000? I didn't expect that, and likelihood is neither did you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smapdi Posted April 5, 2014 Share Posted April 5, 2014 Couldn't agree more. The addition of Mike Williams really takes the pressure off of grabbing a WR @ 9. RT is their biggest hole on offense now & needs to be addressed. I will never be against drafting linemen high because games are won & lost in the trenches. I am all for grabbing one of the big 3 OT's (Robinson, Matthews, Lewan) in the 1st. I know this draft is deep in tackles but those 3 are elite prospects. Getting a bookend OT to pair with Glenn will solidify our line for the next decade. We invested a 1st in Manuel so let's get him some protection. We allowed way too many sacks last season. We also have one of the best backfields in the league with Spiller & FJax. Marrone & Hackett obviously want to run the ball a lot so adding a talented RT is a no brainer. All 3 of those top tackles are great @ getting to the 2nd level so they could put the screen pass back in the play book. Spiller is at his deadliest on screens & that play was pretty much ignored last season. I don't think the coaches had much confidence in Pears and/or Colin Brown to effectively block in the 2nd level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts