Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 3/21/2014 at 4:46 AM, GreggyT said:

A NASA scientist brazenly announced the urgent need for mankind to terriform not one, not two, but three planets ... just to keep our species alive.

 

Or, you know, if that fails we could try something else like salt water farming.

 

http://motherboard.v...-scientist-says

 

The biggest problem with Mars is it's dead core. Earth's rotating molten metal core is what generates the electromagnetic field that shields our atmosphere from the solar winds. Mars being smaller than Earth cooled down quicker and lost it's molten core a billion years ago.

 

Carl Sagen hypothesized that Mars could be terraformed with plants. But without a EM field around the planet whatever gases you could generate would drift off into space. You might as well just live on the moon.

 

PTR

Posted
  On 3/21/2014 at 7:02 PM, PromoTheRobot said:

The biggest problem with Mars is it's dead core. Earth's rotating molten metal core is what generates the electromagnetic field that shields our atmosphere from the solar winds. Mars being smaller than Earth cooled down quicker and lost it's molten core a billion years ago.

 

Carl Sagen hypothesized that Mars could be terraformed with plants. But without a EM field around the planet whatever gases you could generate would drift off into space. You might as well just live on the moon.

 

PTR

plus you'd save on the cab fare
Posted
  On 3/21/2014 at 7:02 PM, PromoTheRobot said:

...whatever gases you could generate would drift off into space.

PTR

I dunno... I can generate a lot of gases.
Posted
  On 3/21/2014 at 7:02 PM, PromoTheRobot said:

The biggest problem with Mars is it's dead core. Earth's rotating molten metal core is what generates the electromagnetic field that shields our atmosphere from the solar winds. Mars being smaller than Earth cooled down quicker and lost it's molten core a billion years ago.

 

Carl Sagen hypothesized that Mars could be terraformed with plants. But without a EM field around the planet whatever gases you could generate would drift off into space. You might as well just live on the moon.

 

PTR

 

No, without a magnetic field you're exposed to solar radiation.

 

That has ****-all to do with keeping an atmosphere. It's also one of the biggest technical hurdles for a manned Mars mission, as you need something to protect people from solar flares, both in transit and on the Martian surface.

Posted
  On 3/21/2014 at 9:52 PM, DC Tom said:

It's also one of the biggest technical hurdles for a manned Mars mission, as you need something to protect people from solar flares, both in transit and on the Martian surface.

 

Given the gases released, I think these should more accurately be called "Sun farts"

Posted
  On 3/22/2014 at 9:24 AM, Nanker said:

Right. We don't have a rocket ship capable of reaching the ISS, yet alone the moon, and this buzzard wants to go to the planets.

They just say we don't have ships capable of reaching the ISS. But I have it on good authority (from the History Channel) that we have a secret space military program that is capable of reaching across the universe -- let alone upper orbit -- in a matter of moments. They wouldn't lie about something like that on the History channel, would they?

Posted
  On 3/22/2014 at 7:30 PM, GreggyT said:

They just say we don't have ships capable of reaching the ISS. But I have it on good authority (from the History Channel) that we have a secret space military program that is capable of reaching across the universe -- let alone upper orbit -- in a matter of moments. They wouldn't lie about something like that on the History channel, would they?

 

Yeah, but that was like ancient Sumerian technology. We're not that advanced.

×
×
  • Create New...