Jauronimo Posted February 21, 2014 Posted February 21, 2014 there is no double standard when it comes to a man assaulting a woman.. maybe i am old school, but i do not believe it is right under any circumstances .. There is no double standard when its ok for women to hit men and its never ok for a man to hit a woman? Perhaps I'm old fashioned, but isn't that the definition of a double standard?
dwight in philly Posted February 21, 2014 Author Posted February 21, 2014 There is no double standard when its ok for women to hit men and its never ok for a man to hit a woman? Perhaps I'm old fashioned, but isn't that the definition of a double standard? my point, minus your evaluation is that is never ok to hit a woman.. i hope that clears it up, regardless of nitpicking what a "double standard" is.
Jauronimo Posted February 21, 2014 Posted February 21, 2014 (edited) my point, minus your evaluation is that is never ok to hit a woman.. i hope that clears it up, regardless of nitpicking what a "double standard" is. Its not nitpicking. Its the definition of the term. I've understand you from the start. You believe the double standard is the correct order of business. I agree, mostly, but in extreme situations I think there are exceptions to that rule. In any event, I really doubt that the Ray Rice incident falls under one these exceptions. Edited February 21, 2014 by Jauronimo
dwight in philly Posted February 21, 2014 Author Posted February 21, 2014 Its not nitpicking. Its the definition of the term. I've understand you from the start. You believe the double standard is the correct order of business. I agree, mostly, but in extreme situations I think there are exceptions to that rule. In any event, I really doubt that the Ray Rice incident falls under one these exceptions. ok.. i do realize the content and grammar police are always lurking..but a man should not hit a woman
Jauronimo Posted February 21, 2014 Posted February 21, 2014 ok.. i do realize the content and grammar police are always lurking..but a man should not hit a woman Grammar police??? In discussing whether an obvious double standard is just, you declared that there is no double standard. Thats not a technicality. I'm not calling you out on a typo or a missing comma or something completely trivial. I don't think its unreasonable to interject when the discussion starts veering into a territory where things cease to be what they most certainly are. There are limits.
dwight in philly Posted February 21, 2014 Author Posted February 21, 2014 Grammar police??? In discussing whether an obvious double standard is just, you declared that there is no double standard. Thats not a technicality. I'm not calling you out on a typo or a missing comma or something completely trivial. I don't think its unreasonable to interject when the discussion starts veering into a territory where things cease to be what they most certainly are. There are limits. you questioned my use of the term "double standard" the gist is about men assaulting women.. if i used "double standard" incorrectly GUILTY.. next..
HamSandwhich Posted February 21, 2014 Posted February 21, 2014 you questioned my use of the term "double standard" the gist is about men assaulting women.. if i used "double standard" incorrectly GUILTY.. next.. I don't think you're getting what he's saying.
dwight in philly Posted February 21, 2014 Author Posted February 21, 2014 (edited) I don't think you're getting what he's saying. OBVIOUSLY..i dont care, if my use of the term standard was incorrect, so be it, my main point was men assaulting women.. if it would make you feel better ill go back and delete my reference to "double standard" Edited February 21, 2014 by dwight in philly
Jauronimo Posted February 21, 2014 Posted February 21, 2014 OBVIOUSLY..i dont care, if my use of the term standard was incorrect, so be it, my main point was men assaulting women.. if it would make you feel better ill go back and delete my reference to "double standard" So its ignorance AND apathy. A winning combination if there ever was one.
dwight in philly Posted February 21, 2014 Author Posted February 21, 2014 (edited) So its ignorance AND apathy. A winning combination if there ever was one. why the dissection of this topic?.. and why the insult? "ignorance"? guess it is nice to be the all omniscient of the board.. next time you are near a dictionary, look up the word "pompous". Edited February 21, 2014 by dwight in philly
Jauronimo Posted February 21, 2014 Posted February 21, 2014 (edited) why the dissection of this topic?.. and why the insult? "ignorance"? guess it is nice to be the all omniscient of the board.. next time you are near a dictionary, look up the word "pompous". Two posts ago you expressed pride in neither knowing or caring and now you're insulted? The victim mentality is strong with this one. I took time out of my day, time which could have been spent pursuing a hobby, to help you communicate and hopefully save you from future embarrassment and this is the thanks I get? No good deed goes unpunished. Edited February 21, 2014 by Jauronimo
White Linen Posted February 21, 2014 Posted February 21, 2014 there is no double standard when it comes to a man assaulting a woman.. maybe i am old school, but i do not believe it is right under any circumstances .. Yes there is because you're making one.
dwight in philly Posted February 21, 2014 Author Posted February 21, 2014 (edited) Two posts ago you expressed pride in neither knowing or caring and now you're insulted? The victim mentality is strong with this one. I took time out of my day, time which could have been spent pursuing a hobby, to help you communicate and hopefully save you from future embarrassment and this is the thanks I get? No good deed goes unpunished. thanks , i will just look for your comments and try to learn from you. Edited February 21, 2014 by dwight in philly
dwight in philly Posted February 21, 2014 Author Posted February 21, 2014 Yes there is because you're making one. again.. point missed.. it is about a man wacking a woman and knocking her out..
White Linen Posted February 22, 2014 Posted February 22, 2014 again.. point missed.. it is about a man wacking a woman and knocking her out.. Ever been beaten up by a woman that's not a relative?
dwight in philly Posted February 22, 2014 Author Posted February 22, 2014 Ever been beaten up by a woman that's not a relative? no
White Linen Posted February 23, 2014 Posted February 23, 2014 no Seems as though someone who has experienced it should be the one to say nothing should be done about it.
dwight in philly Posted March 27, 2014 Author Posted March 27, 2014 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/03/27/ray-rice-indicted-for-aggravated-assault/
plenzmd1 Posted March 27, 2014 Posted March 27, 2014 oy vey, not to get into this again. I am happy he is being indicted now that they did a thorough investigation. that is all anyone was saying, you had em convicted in 60 seconds, they at least investigated before making the assumptions. And, he is still innocent until proven
FLFan Posted March 27, 2014 Posted March 27, 2014 This goes on all the time in all classes, not just the NFL. They just happen to be under a microscope as players. Check your local booking blotter everyday. You'll see both men AND women arrested every single day for domestic. Numerous people every day, not just a couple. Just because he is "unlucky" enough to be famous, and just because it happens all the time, does not make him any less a scumbag. If a woman assaults a man then they are fair game, equal rights and equal lefts for all. Stay classey.
.thumb.jpg.722aeba127c7cb0fa5732d105ed7f1a3.jpg)
Recommended Posts