YoloinOhio Posted February 17, 2014 Posted February 17, 2014 This is an interesting article... focuses mainly on Geno and Glennon because they played closer to full seasons, but also has a table where you can sort EJ's #s and compare to the rookie QBs most like him from previous years. The article says it won't say much about EJ's future (because the stats they used were poor across the board; I assume also because he only played 10 games). But it was interesting the comparisons with the other 2. http://www.footballperspective.com/the-contrasting-statistical-profiles-of-geno-smith-and-mike-glennon/
OldTimer1960 Posted February 17, 2014 Posted February 17, 2014 In my very humble opinion, it is very risky to evaluate rookie QBs, no matter their stats. Smith and Manual suffered from a lack of experienced playmakers at TE and WR. How will they develop? I certainly don't know, but I still like everything that I've read about EJ Manual's work-ethic and intelligence.
Recommended Posts