jumbalaya Posted February 6, 2014 Posted February 6, 2014 Missouri's Michael Sam. Sam can play Mike Mike can play Mike Sam can play Sam Mike can play Sam Mike Sam can play Sam Mike Sam can play Mike He just won't play Will.
sodbuster Posted February 6, 2014 Posted February 6, 2014 Find out if his middle name is William. Report back to us.
Tintonfallsbillsfan Posted February 6, 2014 Posted February 6, 2014 sadly 43 will always be the Mike .
FluffHead Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 (edited) More versatile than we originally thought Good for him. @ESPNNFL: BREAKING: Michael Sam, SEC co-Defensive Player of the Year from Missouri says he is gay; could become first openly gay NFL player. Edited February 10, 2014 by FluffHead
Maury Ballstein Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 More versatile than we originally thought Just bumped Keith smart off espns top story Projected 4th round lb....first openly gay person to do so.
boyst Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 And, so history will remember incorrectly that Bryan Scott was the reason for so many defensive failures of 2012. Can he play Jack? I am fine if he can't play Will. Don't know anything about him, at least not yet. I am 110% with making this guy a Bills player for the reason that he came out.
Kirby Jackson Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 (edited) Good for him. I can't imagine that it is an easy thing to do. It takes a lot of courage. I hope that he has a great career. Edited February 10, 2014 by Kirby Jackson
NoSaint Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 I'm curious to see how the process plays out and where he ends up draft day.
CSBill Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 Don't know anything about him, at least not yet. I am 110% with making this guy a Bills player for the reason that he came out. Right? Sure, the Bills are in a position to be making social / cultural / political statements with their draft picks? How about, "I am 110% making this guy a Bills player" if he can really play football and help this team win?!?!?!
Buffalo Barbarian Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 I thought 43 was the mike no, it's 52
boyst Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 Right? Sure, the Bills are in a position to be making social / cultural / political statements with their draft picks? How about, "I am 110% making this guy a Bills player" if he can really play football and help this team win?!?!?! We play Nigel Bradham at ILB. We really can't worse.
FluffHead Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 Saw a lot of Missouri this season and he was a hell of a college football player
NoSaint Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 We play Nigel Bradham at ILB. We really can't worse. On a purely practical level, he's likely to slide a few spots and may end up a value pick. Surprised it was kept quiet so long, given he came out to the team last year.
FluffHead Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 (edited) We play Nigel Bradham at ILB. We really can't worse. Sam will likely be a 34 OLB/Pass rusher Edited February 10, 2014 by FluffHead
boyst Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 Sam will likely be a 34 OLB/Pass rusher which is why I mentioned him playing Jack. He seems to better fit as a Jack if he plays both Mike and Sam. Bring in Daryl Smith @ Mike, Alonso @ Will, Sam @ Jack, Lawson @ Sam.
FluffHead Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 which is why I mentioned him playing Jack. He seems to better fit as a Jack if he plays both Mike and Sam. Bring in Daryl Smith @ Mike, Alonso @ Will, Sam @ Jack, Lawson @ Sam. I agree however he did not play Mike or Sam in college despite his name being Mike Sam. He played DE in a 43 defense for mizzou.
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 I'm tired of versatility. I'd like to see players who are exception at their position. Brad Smith was versatile, Byron Scott was versatile. I'd really just rather see a guy who can consistently tackle a RB before he is 5 yards downfield without being a total albatross in pass coverage.
Kirby Jackson Posted February 10, 2014 Posted February 10, 2014 (edited) I'm tired of versatility. I'd like to see players who are exception at their position. Brad Smith was versatile, Byron Scott was versatile. I'd really just rather see a guy who can consistently tackle a RB before he is 5 yards downfield without being a total albatross in pass coverage. I think that the reality is in today's NFL you have to be "multiple" (to quote a former d coordinator). There have been such advancements in scouting that teams cannot only do certain things when certain personnel packages are on the field. Guys cannot be one dimensional or they will be exposed before the ball is even snapped. That is Wannstedt 101. The goal now is for guys to be "multiple" enough to be in a few different places once the ball is snapped. This way you can potentially confuse the offense enough to make some plays. In today's game if the offense knows where the guys will be before the ball is snapped you will get destroyed. Edited February 10, 2014 by Kirby Jackson
Recommended Posts