Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

It does in San Diego, police shoot people here all the time here just for thinking they have a gun.

That's because they have qualified immunity, which is a completely different legal standard.

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

So the trial is underway and it basically looks like this guy tried to kill a bunch of black kids and then claimed they had a gun the police didnt find, his girlfriend never saw or heard him talk about afterwards, then he ran away and ordered a pizza...

What did he order on the pizza?

Posted

So the trial is underway and it basically looks like this guy tried to kill a bunch of black kids and then claimed they had a gun the police didnt find, his girlfriend never saw or heard him talk about afterwards, then he ran away and ordered a pizza...

 

One piece of absolutely vital information I need to judge this topic:

 

Did the kids have Skittles?

Posted

The guy sounds like a first class A-hole and will not have an easy time of it in the big house once he gets there... and yes, I do think he'll get there.

Posted

Seems to be a reasonable verdict.

 

It is??? How do you get three attempted murder guilty verdicts yet for the kid he murdered it's a hung verdict? One juror bought the self defense lie even though he bought the guy attempted to murder the three who were wounded.

 

In twenty years this guy will be free and the kid will still be dead. Justice? Not sure about that.

Posted

It is??? How do you get three attempted murder guilty verdicts yet for the kid he murdered it's a hung verdict? One juror bought the self defense lie even though he bought the guy attempted to murder the three who were wounded.

 

In twenty years this guy will be free and the kid will still be dead. Justice? Not sure about that.

 

You have a pitiful understanding of how the world works.

 

First degree murder - which he was charged with - requires premeditation. All the verdict means is that, for what he was charged with, there was significant doubt as to whether he had formed the intent to kill before he fired.

 

Notably, the attempted murder charges were second degree - depraved indifference instead of willful intent. So basically, the jury found there was no premeditation.

Posted

 

 

You have a pitiful understanding of how the world works.

 

First degree murder - which he was charged with - requires premeditation. All the verdict means is that, for what he was charged with, there was significant doubt as to whether he had formed the intent to kill before he fired.

 

Notably, the attempted murder charges were second degree - depraved indifference instead of willful intent. So basically, the jury found there was no premeditation.

 

No Tom, The Jury didn't find anything. It was a hung jury. Big difference

Posted

No Tom, The Jury didn't find anything. It was a hung jury. Big difference

 

Jesus Christ. Are you willfully this dense? Read my post again, !@#$wit. Read it CAREFULLY this time.

Posted

No Tom, The Jury didn't find anything. It was a hung jury. Big difference

You have been intimate with the members of jury to know this, I am sure?

 

It is??? How do you get three attempted murder guilty verdicts yet for the kid he murdered it's a hung verdict? One juror bought the self defense lie even though he bought the guy attempted to murder the three who were wounded.

 

In twenty years this guy will be free and the kid will still be dead. Justice? Not sure about that.

If you're being cereal, which I doubt you are... The 1st degree murder means he got out of his car, heck, he undid his seatbelt, turned around, whatever...knowing he was going to shoot AND kill him.

 

That is far fetched because he did not display any activity which would show support of this argument, though he is a major !@#$.

×
×
  • Create New...