TakeYouToTasker Posted February 8, 2014 Share Posted February 8, 2014 It does in San Diego, police shoot people here all the time here just for thinking they have a gun. That's because they have qualified immunity, which is a completely different legal standard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 So the trial is underway and it basically looks like this guy tried to kill a bunch of black kids and then claimed they had a gun the police didnt find, his girlfriend never saw or heard him talk about afterwards, then he ran away and ordered a pizza... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 So the trial is underway and it basically looks like this guy tried to kill a bunch of black kids and then claimed they had a gun the police didnt find, his girlfriend never saw or heard him talk about afterwards, then he ran away and ordered a pizza... What did he order on the pizza? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 So the trial is underway and it basically looks like this guy tried to kill a bunch of black kids and then claimed they had a gun the police didnt find, his girlfriend never saw or heard him talk about afterwards, then he ran away and ordered a pizza... One piece of absolutely vital information I need to judge this topic: Did the kids have Skittles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 (edited) What did he order on the pizza? Sh It Edited February 13, 2014 by gatorman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 Sh It This was one of your prouder moments here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 “Loud music” Murder Case: Closing Arguments; Jury in Deliberations “Loud music” Murder Case: Prosecution Delivers Solid Close “Loud Music” Murder Trial Day 5: Dunn Testifies, Defense Rests LIVE COVERAGE: “Loud Music” Murder Trial, Day 4 for those who demonstrate little awareness of what is occurring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 “Loud music” Murder Case: Closing Arguments; Jury in Deliberations “Loud music” Murder Case: Prosecution Delivers Solid Close “Loud Music” Murder Trial Day 5: Dunn Testifies, Defense Rests LIVE COVERAGE: “Loud Music” Murder Trial, Day 4[/b for those who demonstrate little awareness of what is occurring. is he innocent? Tell us what you think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2014/0215/Florida-jury-finds-Michael-Dunn-guilty-in-loud-music-murder-case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 GUILTY! Dunn Guilty of Most Charges, But Not Murder Michael Dunn found guilty of three counts of attempted murder in the second degree, throwing missiles, but jury hangs on first degree murder of Jordan Davis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 Seems to be a reasonable verdict. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 Seems to be a reasonable verdict. Yep..........the Jury did a very good job. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 The guy sounds like a first class A-hole and will not have an easy time of it in the big house once he gets there... and yes, I do think he'll get there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 Seems to be a reasonable verdict. It is??? How do you get three attempted murder guilty verdicts yet for the kid he murdered it's a hung verdict? One juror bought the self defense lie even though he bought the guy attempted to murder the three who were wounded. In twenty years this guy will be free and the kid will still be dead. Justice? Not sure about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 It is??? How do you get three attempted murder guilty verdicts yet for the kid he murdered it's a hung verdict? One juror bought the self defense lie even though he bought the guy attempted to murder the three who were wounded. In twenty years this guy will be free and the kid will still be dead. Justice? Not sure about that. You have a pitiful understanding of how the world works. First degree murder - which he was charged with - requires premeditation. All the verdict means is that, for what he was charged with, there was significant doubt as to whether he had formed the intent to kill before he fired. Notably, the attempted murder charges were second degree - depraved indifference instead of willful intent. So basically, the jury found there was no premeditation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 You have a pitiful understanding of how the world works. First degree murder - which he was charged with - requires premeditation. All the verdict means is that, for what he was charged with, there was significant doubt as to whether he had formed the intent to kill before he fired. Notably, the attempted murder charges were second degree - depraved indifference instead of willful intent. So basically, the jury found there was no premeditation. No Tom, The Jury didn't find anything. It was a hung jury. Big difference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 No Tom, The Jury didn't find anything. It was a hung jury. Big difference Jesus Christ. Are you willfully this dense? Read my post again, !@#$wit. Read it CAREFULLY this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 Jesus Christ. Are you willfully this dense? Read my post again, !@#$wit. Read it CAREFULLY this time. My bad, you are right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 My bad, you are right You're such a !@#$ing tool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 No Tom, The Jury didn't find anything. It was a hung jury. Big difference You have been intimate with the members of jury to know this, I am sure? It is??? How do you get three attempted murder guilty verdicts yet for the kid he murdered it's a hung verdict? One juror bought the self defense lie even though he bought the guy attempted to murder the three who were wounded. In twenty years this guy will be free and the kid will still be dead. Justice? Not sure about that. If you're being cereal, which I doubt you are... The 1st degree murder means he got out of his car, heck, he undid his seatbelt, turned around, whatever...knowing he was going to shoot AND kill him. That is far fetched because he did not display any activity which would show support of this argument, though he is a major !@#$. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts