Jump to content

Time For A Tea Party Thread


3rdnlng

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 535
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What? Like doctors and pharmacists? This guy is a complete idiot. A think tank boob. This is exactly why you guys remind me of communists. They were so dogmatic and never had a chance here of coming to power so their fantasies could run wild. This guy goes after child labor, clean water and health care, as if we are going to just give those up in the name of letting a different level of government take care of that. And why? Well, because. We see what's happening in North Carolina and West Virginia with states f'n up the water.

 

So Rand Paul get's a standing ovation in Berkeley of all places. Time to worry gatorboy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

one by one.................

 

 

Tea Partier wins write-in race for Pennsylvania state Senate seat

 

by Marc Tapscott

 

York is a modest little city in Southern Pennsylvania not too far from Baltimore and right in the heart of Dutch country. It's not the sort of place where political revolutions are found.

 

But Republican state Senate nominee Ron Miller may think differently this morning because he just lost a special election to a write-in Tea Party candidate, Scott Wagner.

 

"With 100 percent of precincts reporting Tuesday night, write-in votes totaled 10,595, or 47.7 percent, to Miller's 5,920, or 26.6 percent. Democrat Linda Small of New Freedom nearly edged out Miller with 5,704 votes, for 25.7 percent," according to the York Dispatch.

 

Pennsylvania is a place where it can sometimes be difficult to tell the Democrats from the Republicans, at least at the state level.

 

Wagner, who owns a trash compactor business, ran on a typical Tea Party small-government/fiscal conservativism ticket.

 

He attributed his win in great part to the relentlessly negative attacks on him by the local and state GOP party establishments.

 

 

 

 

.

 

.

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Rand Paul get's a standing ovation in Berkeley of all places. Time to worry gatorboy.

 

 

Oh really? Did he tell them he was freeing American from the slavery of government?

 

one by one.................

 

 

 

 

.

 

.

Ha ha! You clowns are celebrating write in wins to state senate now??
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Rand Paul get's a standing ovation in Berkeley of all places. Time to worry gatorboy.

 

ROGER SIMON: “Whatever you think of Rand Paul, he’s actually doing something that politicians rarely do — talking at length to audiences who don’t usually agree with him. And winning over new friends in the process.”

 

Plus:

The country is changing. Whole new groups are ripe for the picking, most obviously the young who are being so completely raked over by the Obama administration via Obamacare and the rest of the entitlements so many of them know they will never see. They were ready to applaud at Berkeley.

 

And African Americans — when, since the end of Jim Crow, have they done worse than under the Obama administration with its record black unemployment numbers and horrifying statistics on out-of-wedlock births in their community? Consciously or unconsciously, Democrats have been waging a “War on Blacks” since the days of the Great Society. It’s been a disaster for African Americans, a nightmare, in truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ROGER SIMON: “Whatever you think of Rand Paul, he’s actually doing something that politicians rarely do — talking at length to audiences who don’t usually agree with him. And winning over new friends in the process.”

 

Plus:

The country is changing. Whole new groups are ripe for the picking, most obviously the young who are being so completely raked over by the Obama administration via Obamacare and the rest of the entitlements so many of them know they will never see. They were ready to applaud at Berkeley.

 

And African Americans — when, since the end of Jim Crow, have they done worse than under the Obama administration with its record black unemployment numbers and horrifying statistics on out-of-wedlock births in their community? Consciously or unconsciously, Democrats have been waging a “War on Blacks” since the days of the Great Society. It’s been a disaster for African Americans, a nightmare, in truth.

He is against same sex marriage. Most young people think that's a hateful stance. His speech in Berkley was to praise the Great Democrat Diane Finestein who blasted the CIA. He praises a Democrat in California and gets applause and Cons think this is a great turning point? lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is against same sex marriage. Most young people think that's a hateful stance. His speech in Berkley was to praise the Great Democrat Diane Finestein who blasted the CIA. He praises a Democrat in California and gets applause and Cons think this is a great turning point? lol

 

His speach was to praise Finestein??

 

And we think this is a great turning point??

 

Damn dude, you read a lot of things that aren't there.

Edited by Chef Jim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is against same sex marriage. Most young people think that's a hateful stance. His speech in Berkley was to praise the Great Democrat Diane Finestein who blasted the CIA. He praises a Democrat in California and gets applause and Cons think this is a great turning point? lol

 

Why do you liberal socialists have to always take things to the extreme by using words like "hateful" and "racist" when normal everyday discussion will do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Why do you liberal socialists have to always take things to the extreme by using words like "hateful" and "racist" when normal everyday discussion will do?

Because it's a fact, that's how people see opponents of same sex marriage. If you don't like facts I don't know what to tell you. You obviously have a real hard time with reality, but at least you have a lot of company

 

 

 

Because if not for hyperbole they'd have nothing.

Poor Tom, lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it's a fact, that's how people see opponents of same sex marriage. If you don't like facts I don't know what to tell you. You obviously have a real hard time with reality, but at least you have a lot of company

 

Poor Tom, lol

 

So, hypothetically speaking if I'm against gay marriage I'm a hateful person? I'm a racist if I'm pro voter I.D. laws? A yes or no answer to both questions will be sufficient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because if not for hyperbole they'd have nothing.

Lets return the favor and use hyperbole on liberal facists. Except this hyperbole, Obama's WAR ON WOMEN is based on facts.

 

http://www.forbes.co...and-minorities/

 

Obama clearly hates women. Especially black and minority women. Reagan on the other hand clearly loved women by the way he treated them economically.

Edited by Dante
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not what I said. What I said was about politics and perception. Pay attention

 

What don't you get about this?

Posted Today, 04:15 PM

snapback.png3rdnlng, on 20 March 2014 - 03:19 PM, said:

 

 

 

Why do you liberal socialists have to always take things to the extreme by using words like "hateful" and "racist" when normal everyday discussion will do?

Because it's a fact, that's how people see opponents of same sex marriage. If you don't like facts I don't know what to tell you. You obviously have a real hard time with reality, but at least you have a lot of company

 

And then, this:

snapback.png3rdnlng, on 20 March 2014 - 05:47 PM, said:

 

 

 

So, hypothetically speaking if I'm against gay marriage I'm a hateful person?

That's not what I said. What I said was about politics and perception. Pay attention

 

You clearly are a basket case.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets return the favor and use hyperbole on liberal facists. Except this hyperbole, Obama's WAR ON WOMEN is based on facts.

 

http://www.forbes.co...and-minorities/

 

Obama clearly hates women. Especially black and minority women. Reagan on the other hand clearly loved women by the way he treated them economically.

 

There is no question: few have done more to set back minorities, women and teens than Barack Obama. He's a one-man wrecking ball of policies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...