Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 you say the right reminds you of communists, and yet you call someone else a boob? Well its not perfectly simple so you don't understand it. Not my fault
Azalin Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 Well its not perfectly simple so you don't understand it. Not my fault are you kidding? it has to be simple because you said it.
Chef Jim Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 What? Like doctors and pharmacists? This guy is a complete idiot. A think tank boob. This is exactly why you guys remind me of communists. They were so dogmatic and never had a chance here of coming to power so their fantasies could run wild. This guy goes after child labor, clean water and health care, as if we are going to just give those up in the name of letting a different level of government take care of that. And why? Well, because. We see what's happening in North Carolina and West Virginia with states f'n up the water. So Rand Paul get's a standing ovation in Berkeley of all places. Time to worry gatorboy.
B-Man Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 (edited) one by one................. Tea Partier wins write-in race for Pennsylvania state Senate seat by Marc Tapscott York is a modest little city in Southern Pennsylvania not too far from Baltimore and right in the heart of Dutch country. It's not the sort of place where political revolutions are found. But Republican state Senate nominee Ron Miller may think differently this morning because he just lost a special election to a write-in Tea Party candidate, Scott Wagner. "With 100 percent of precincts reporting Tuesday night, write-in votes totaled 10,595, or 47.7 percent, to Miller's 5,920, or 26.6 percent. Democrat Linda Small of New Freedom nearly edged out Miller with 5,704 votes, for 25.7 percent," according to the York Dispatch. Pennsylvania is a place where it can sometimes be difficult to tell the Democrats from the Republicans, at least at the state level. Wagner, who owns a trash compactor business, ran on a typical Tea Party small-government/fiscal conservativism ticket. He attributed his win in great part to the relentlessly negative attacks on him by the local and state GOP party establishments. . . Edited March 20, 2014 by B-Man
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 So Rand Paul get's a standing ovation in Berkeley of all places. Time to worry gatorboy. Oh really? Did he tell them he was freeing American from the slavery of government? one by one................. . . Ha ha! You clowns are celebrating write in wins to state senate now??
Chef Jim Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 Oh really? Did he tell them he was freeing American from the slavery of government? No, he talked about pizza crusts.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 No, he talked about pizza crusts. I'm surprised he was allowed to speak in America, it being a tyranny and all
B-Man Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 So Rand Paul get's a standing ovation in Berkeley of all places. Time to worry gatorboy. ROGER SIMON: “Whatever you think of Rand Paul, he’s actually doing something that politicians rarely do — talking at length to audiences who don’t usually agree with him. And winning over new friends in the process.” Plus: The country is changing. Whole new groups are ripe for the picking, most obviously the young who are being so completely raked over by the Obama administration via Obamacare and the rest of the entitlements so many of them know they will never see. They were ready to applaud at Berkeley. And African Americans — when, since the end of Jim Crow, have they done worse than under the Obama administration with its record black unemployment numbers and horrifying statistics on out-of-wedlock births in their community? Consciously or unconsciously, Democrats have been waging a “War on Blacks” since the days of the Great Society. It’s been a disaster for African Americans, a nightmare, in truth.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 ROGER SIMON: “Whatever you think of Rand Paul, he’s actually doing something that politicians rarely do — talking at length to audiences who don’t usually agree with him. And winning over new friends in the process.” Plus: The country is changing. Whole new groups are ripe for the picking, most obviously the young who are being so completely raked over by the Obama administration via Obamacare and the rest of the entitlements so many of them know they will never see. They were ready to applaud at Berkeley. And African Americans — when, since the end of Jim Crow, have they done worse than under the Obama administration with its record black unemployment numbers and horrifying statistics on out-of-wedlock births in their community? Consciously or unconsciously, Democrats have been waging a “War on Blacks” since the days of the Great Society. It’s been a disaster for African Americans, a nightmare, in truth. He is against same sex marriage. Most young people think that's a hateful stance. His speech in Berkley was to praise the Great Democrat Diane Finestein who blasted the CIA. He praises a Democrat in California and gets applause and Cons think this is a great turning point? lol
Chef Jim Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 (edited) He is against same sex marriage. Most young people think that's a hateful stance. His speech in Berkley was to praise the Great Democrat Diane Finestein who blasted the CIA. He praises a Democrat in California and gets applause and Cons think this is a great turning point? lol His speach was to praise Finestein?? And we think this is a great turning point?? Damn dude, you read a lot of things that aren't there. Edited March 20, 2014 by Chef Jim
3rdnlng Posted March 20, 2014 Author Posted March 20, 2014 He is against same sex marriage. Most young people think that's a hateful stance. His speech in Berkley was to praise the Great Democrat Diane Finestein who blasted the CIA. He praises a Democrat in California and gets applause and Cons think this is a great turning point? lol Why do you liberal socialists have to always take things to the extreme by using words like "hateful" and "racist" when normal everyday discussion will do?
DC Tom Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 Why do you liberal socialists have to always take things to the extreme by using words like "hateful" and "racist" when normal everyday discussion will do? Because if not for hyperbole they'd have nothing.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 Why do you liberal socialists have to always take things to the extreme by using words like "hateful" and "racist" when normal everyday discussion will do? Because it's a fact, that's how people see opponents of same sex marriage. If you don't like facts I don't know what to tell you. You obviously have a real hard time with reality, but at least you have a lot of company Because if not for hyperbole they'd have nothing. Poor Tom, lol
3rdnlng Posted March 20, 2014 Author Posted March 20, 2014 Because it's a fact, that's how people see opponents of same sex marriage. If you don't like facts I don't know what to tell you. You obviously have a real hard time with reality, but at least you have a lot of company Poor Tom, lol So, hypothetically speaking if I'm against gay marriage I'm a hateful person? I'm a racist if I'm pro voter I.D. laws? A yes or no answer to both questions will be sufficient.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 So, hypothetically speaking if I'm against gay marriage I'm a hateful person? That's not what I said. What I said was about politics and perception. Pay attention
Azalin Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 That's not what I said. What I said was about politics and perception. Pay attention you? speaking about perception?
Dante Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 (edited) Because if not for hyperbole they'd have nothing. Lets return the favor and use hyperbole on liberal facists. Except this hyperbole, Obama's WAR ON WOMEN is based on facts. http://www.forbes.co...and-minorities/ Obama clearly hates women. Especially black and minority women. Reagan on the other hand clearly loved women by the way he treated them economically. Edited March 20, 2014 by Dante
Chef Jim Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 That's not what I said. What I said was about politics and perception. Pay attention So they (progressives) vote based on perception not reality? Yeah, sounds about right.
3rdnlng Posted March 20, 2014 Author Posted March 20, 2014 That's not what I said. What I said was about politics and perception. Pay attention What don't you get about this? Posted Today, 04:15 PM 3rdnlng, on 20 March 2014 - 03:19 PM, said: Why do you liberal socialists have to always take things to the extreme by using words like "hateful" and "racist" when normal everyday discussion will do? Because it's a fact, that's how people see opponents of same sex marriage. If you don't like facts I don't know what to tell you. You obviously have a real hard time with reality, but at least you have a lot of company And then, this: 3rdnlng, on 20 March 2014 - 05:47 PM, said: So, hypothetically speaking if I'm against gay marriage I'm a hateful person? That's not what I said. What I said was about politics and perception. Pay attention You clearly are a basket case.
IDBillzFan Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 Lets return the favor and use hyperbole on liberal facists. Except this hyperbole, Obama's WAR ON WOMEN is based on facts. http://www.forbes.co...and-minorities/ Obama clearly hates women. Especially black and minority women. Reagan on the other hand clearly loved women by the way he treated them economically. There is no question: few have done more to set back minorities, women and teens than Barack Obama. He's a one-man wrecking ball of policies.
Recommended Posts