DC Tom Posted January 14, 2014 Posted January 14, 2014 What, closing an unmanned national monument to save money is wrong? Personally, I would have gone with "closing the ocean" as an example...
IDBillzFan Posted January 14, 2014 Posted January 14, 2014 Just the thought this guy would have some people so stupid high up in his administration. Not even a turnip brain like Tom would do something so dumb as hurt the public to "get" a mayor. Tell me about it. If only he had a second in command like, oh, say, Joe Biden!!! :lol: What, closing an unmanned national monument to save money is wrong? I believe Obama's particular genius was manning an unmanned national monument because there was no money to man the unmanned monument to keep people from seeing something that needed no one to oversee it!
3rdnlng Posted January 14, 2014 Posted January 14, 2014 What, closing an unmanned national monument to save money is wrong? Or evicting people from their home on Lake Meade because it's on leased land?
coastalpika Posted January 15, 2014 Posted January 15, 2014 If no one did anything wrong why couldn't Lerner just say that instead of refusing to testify?
Tiberius Posted January 15, 2014 Posted January 15, 2014 If no one did anything wrong why couldn't Lerner just say that instead of refusing to testify? Because it's his fifth amendment right. Got a problem with the Constitution?
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 15, 2014 Posted January 15, 2014 Because it's his fifth amendment right. Got a problem with the Constitution? What would you say are the key differences between President Obama's abuses of executive power, and Governor Christie's abuses of executive power?
3rdnlng Posted January 15, 2014 Posted January 15, 2014 Because it's his fifth amendment right. Got a problem with the Constitution? You really don't know what you are talking about, do you? Who is this guy named Lerner?
B-Man Posted January 15, 2014 Posted January 15, 2014 (edited) What would you say are the key differences between President Obama's abuses of executive power, and Governor Christie's abuses of executive power? Fool's errand | Define Fool's errand at Dictionary.com . Sarah Palin's father harassed by IRS six times since 2008 Read more: http://www.americant...l#ixzz2qTxdA3cM Paid taxes for 50 years and never heard a word. Then...... . Edited January 15, 2014 by B-Man
Gary M Posted January 15, 2014 Posted January 15, 2014 Paid taxes for 50 years and never heard a word. Then...... . Just a coincidence !!!
IDBillzFan Posted January 15, 2014 Posted January 15, 2014 You really don't know what you are talking about, do you? Who is this guy named Lerner? It's just so adorable when progressives reference the Constitution. Kinda like when Obama references his years as a Harvard professor.
B-Man Posted January 15, 2014 Posted January 15, 2014 CLETA MITCHELL: What FBI ‘investigation’ of the IRS scandal? Last week, we learned that the head of the “probe,” Barbara Bosserman, is a donor to Obama campaigns and the Democratic National Committee. This is, someone who could hardly be trusted to understand what all the fuss is about. Now we learn that the FBI has “concluded” that there was no actual illegal activity involved in the IRS scandal, conclusions reached without ever speaking to a single conservative or Tea Party organization leader or attorney to learn what actually happened these past four years. Having represented dozens of groups before the IRS over the years, including many victimized by the IRS in this scandal, one might have thought the FBI might have called me or even one of my clients. But, to paraphrase the song, if our telephone ain’t ringin,’ I guess it must be the FBI “investigating” the IRS. .
3rdnlng Posted January 15, 2014 Posted January 15, 2014 It's just so adorable when progressives reference the Constitution. Kinda like when Obama references his years as a Harvard professor. Gatortard shoots off its mouth and doesn't know what it is referring to. See picture of Lois Lerner, the person it referred to as a guy.
Azalin Posted January 15, 2014 Author Posted January 15, 2014 Gatortard shoots off its mouth and doesn't know what it is referring to. See picture of Lois Lerner, the person it referred to as a guy. I almost spoiled it for you by blurting that out, but remembered at the last minute that I'd done that to you before.
boyst Posted January 16, 2014 Posted January 16, 2014 Why are we so sure this was a cover up in the FBI? Many of the researchers and agents who spend time on this are ordinary schmoes, right? Do we really think those schmoes were able to find something and have it covered up by their bosses that it then just vanished like a fart in the wind? Or are we thinking it was covered up at the top by directors so the agents could not find it? I do ask this seriously and for good reason, if anyone would be so kind as to answer it. I am very curious what the belief is in this situation.
Tiberius Posted January 16, 2014 Posted January 16, 2014 Why are we so sure this was a cover up in the FBI? Many of the researchers and agents who spend time on this are ordinary schmoes, right? Do we really think those schmoes were able to find something and have it covered up by their bosses that it then just vanished like a fart in the wind? Or are we thinking it was covered up at the top by directors so the agents could not find it? I do ask this seriously and for good reason, if anyone would be so kind as to answer it. I am very curious what the belief is in this situation. Great question
boyst Posted January 16, 2014 Posted January 16, 2014 Great question if you only knew, son I am not sure why and how bottom level or even mid level or directors could cover this up. I do think there was dishonesty in the investigation but I would bet all I have it didn't start with agents at the bottom or the middle. This was all at the top. The FBI don't play and the only thing more powerful then them is more FBI.
3rdnlng Posted January 16, 2014 Posted January 16, 2014 Great question Aren't you in the least bit embarrassed that I posted a picture of the "guy" you referred to that plead the "fifth" and that meant that the FBI could then say that there couldn't have been anything illegal going on? If you had followed this story rather than the Huff Post's narrative maybe you would have avoided the shame.
Tiberius Posted January 16, 2014 Posted January 16, 2014 Aren't you in the least bit embarrassed that I posted a picture of the "guy" you referred to that plead the "fifth" and that meant that the FBI could then say that there couldn't have been anything illegal going on? If you had followed this story rather than the Huff Post's narrative maybe you would have avoided the shame. No
3rdnlng Posted January 16, 2014 Posted January 16, 2014 No There it is guys. Gatortard is not in the least embarassed about having no knowledge about what it was spouting off about.
boyst Posted January 16, 2014 Posted January 16, 2014 There it is guys. Gatortard is not in the least embarassed about having no knowledge about what it was spouting off about. its so easy setting him up. But it is an honest question. One I'd like anyone dare answer. It really can't be
Recommended Posts