Deranged Rhino Posted April 1, 2014 Share Posted April 1, 2014 Apparently not. Both cold and hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 1, 2014 Share Posted April 1, 2014 Apparently not. What I meant was........aw !@#$ it. Never mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 A New Jersey legislative committee probing a political payback operation carried out by Gov. Chris Christie's aides and associates plans to subpoena interview transcripts and other documents from the lawyers the governor hired to carry out an internal investigation, the committee co-chairman said Monday. A statement from Mastro released by the governor's office late Monday afternoon said any additional subpoenas would be reviewed. http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/christies-bridge-scandal-lawyers-subpoenaed-23132480 Huh? Reviewed? You mean his "independent" investigation is not just going to just release all the information? No, these guys are not his defense team, no Is that a shredder I hear? Colonel North might give them a hand, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/christies-bridge-scandal-lawyers-subpoenaed-23132480 Huh? Reviewed? You mean his "independent" investigation is not just going to just release all the information? No, these guys are not his defense team, no Is that a shredder I hear? Colonel North might give them a hand, LOL Why don't they do their own interviews? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Why don't they do their own interviews? They will probably have to, seeing how Christies Defense team either destroyed the records or wrote down as little as possible to protect the governor. But if something does exist it should be turned over, why do a job twice? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 /sigh Again: defense attorney n. 1) the attorney representing the defendant in a lawsuit or criminal prosecution. 2) a lawyer who regularly represents defendants who have insurance and who is chosen by the insurance company. 3) a lawyer who regularly represents criminal defendants. Attorneys who regularly represent clients in actions for damages are often called "plaintiff's attorneys." (See: defendant, plaintiff's attorney) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 /sigh Again: defense attorney n. 1) the attorney representing the defendant in a lawsuit or criminal prosecution. 2) a lawyer who regularly represents defendants who have insurance and who is chosen by the insurance company. 3) a lawyer who regularly represents criminal defendants. Attorneys who regularly represent clients in actions for damages are often called "plaintiff's attorneys." (See: defendant, plaintiff's attorney) Defense team, man, come on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Large Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 They will probably have to, seeing how Christies Defense team either destroyed the records or wrote down as little as possible to protect the governor. But if something does exist it should be turned over, why do a job twice? LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 12, 2014 Share Posted April 12, 2014 They will probably have to, seeing how Christies Defense team either destroyed the records or wrote down as little as possible to protect the governor. But if something does exist it should be turned over, why do a job twice? And the "years" it will take to produce the IRS e-mails is okay with you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 12, 2014 Share Posted April 12, 2014 /sigh Again: defense attorney n. 1) the attorney representing the defendant in a lawsuit or criminal prosecution. 2) a lawyer who regularly represents defendants who have insurance and who is chosen by the insurance company. 3) a lawyer who regularly represents criminal defendants. Attorneys who regularly represent clients in actions for damages are often called "plaintiff's attorneys." (See: defendant, plaintiff's attorney) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted April 12, 2014 Share Posted April 12, 2014 LOL Careful, B. With "LOL"s like that, you may need your own team of independent "defense" attorneys to investigate the matter and "defend" you in the "court" of public opinion... at taxpayer expense, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 17, 2014 Share Posted April 17, 2014 Mr. Perry is the subject of a criminal investigation in Austin over his handling of the local district attorney’s drunken driving arrest and the state financing for a public corruption unit under the district attorney’s control. Though it remains unclear what the outcome will be, the case has been taken seriously by the governor’s office, the special state district judge handling it and the special prosecutor the judge appointed to investigate. Mr. Perry has hired a defense lawyer, David Botsford. A spokeswoman for the governor, Lucy Nashed, said his office had retained Mr. Botsford “to ensure the special prosecutor receives the facts in this matter.” She said Mr. Perry stood by his actions. . Another possible 2016 nominee hires a...Oh but he's not in court http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/17/us/with-eyes-on-2016-perry-is-mired-in-the-past.html?hp&_r=0 Mr. Perry is the subject of a criminal investigation in Austin over his handling of the local district attorney’s drunken driving arrest and the state financing for a public corruption unit under the district attorney’s control. Though it remains unclear what the outcome will be, the case has been taken seriously by the governor’s office, the special state district judge handling it and the special prosecutor the judge appointed to investigate. Mr. Perry has hired a defense lawyer, David Botsford. A spokeswoman for the governor, Lucy Nashed, said his office had retained Mr. Botsford “to ensure the special prosecutor receives the facts in this matter.” She said Mr. Perry stood by his actions. . Another possible 2016 nominee hires a...Oh but he's not in court http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/17/us/with-eyes-on-2016-perry-is-mired-in-the-past.html?hp&_r=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 17, 2014 Share Posted April 17, 2014 /sigh Again: defense attorney n. 1) the attorney representing the defendant in a lawsuit or criminal prosecution. 2) a lawyer who regularly represents defendants who have insurance and who is chosen by the insurance company. 3) a lawyer who regularly represents criminal defendants. Attorneys who regularly represent clients in actions for damages are often called "plaintiff's attorneys." (See: defendant, plaintiff's attorney) Sigh, can you find anymore of a narrow definition? http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-legal-help/what-you-can-expect-from-the-best-criminal-defense-lawyer.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 17, 2014 Share Posted April 17, 2014 Sigh, can you find anymore of a narrow definition? http://criminal.find...nse-lawyer.html From the top of the line site you linked: Because no one criminal case is exactly like another, criminal defense lawyers are trained to pick out the special portions of each case that make them unique. In addition, the best criminal defense lawyer for you may be able to spot certain arguments and factors that could mitigate or even negate any potential crime. When it is all said and done, getting an attorney to represent you in your criminal trial is a necessity. What criminal case are they defending against? Would you just go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 17, 2014 Share Posted April 17, 2014 (edited) Sigh, can you find anymore of a narrow definition? Words have meanings, and those meanings are narrow and specific in order to facilitate communication assuring individuals can understand what ideas other individuals are trying to express without any ambiguity. Did you really need oral and written communication explained to you? Edited April 17, 2014 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 17, 2014 Share Posted April 17, 2014 Words have meanings, and those meanings are narrow and specific in order to facilitate communication assuring individuals can understand what ideas other individuals are trying to express without any ambiguity. Did you really need oral and written communication explained to you? You are all wrong and I am right. Do you understand that communication? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 17, 2014 Share Posted April 17, 2014 You are all wrong and I am right. Do you understand that communication? So, the English language is wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Any updates on this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Any updates on this? His diet ain't working...still Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Adams Posted November 6, 2014 Share Posted November 6, 2014 Any updates on this? I'm sorry. Today's non-issue issue is ebola. Please watch this space for updates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts