DC Tom Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 4:05 PM, gatorman said: So i was an independent investigation that basically absolved the governor that hired the lawyers (oh that's right, the Office did, yes you are a moron) and pegged this women as the perp? You cannot be this stupid People do not hire attorneys to find them guilty you little tool HE WASN'T CHRISTIE'S ATTORNEY! WHY AREN'T YOU COMPLAINING ABOUT THAT?
Chef Jim Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 4:05 PM, gatorman said: People do not hire attorneys to find them guilty you little tool No they hire them to defend against civil or criminal charges. What charges did Christie hire ( ) this attorney to defend against.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 5:20 PM, DC Tom said: HE WASN'T CHRISTIE'S ATTORNEY! WHY AREN'T YOU COMPLAINING ABOUT THAT? And I want to sell you a bridge in Brooklyn!!
DC Tom Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 6:34 PM, gatorman said: And I want to sell you a bridge in Brooklyn!! So you're okay with Christie using taxpayer dollars to hire his own, personal attorney?
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 6:00 PM, Chef Jim said: No they hire them to defend against civil or criminal charges. What charges did Christie hire ( ) this attorney to defend against. But he hired an attorney, yes? And he did defend him against being charged. Again, you think this was a truly independent study? You are breathing exhaust fumes maybe? On 3/31/2014 at 6:35 PM, DC Tom said: So you're okay with Christie using taxpayer dollars to hire his own, personal attorney? Why are you trying to change the subject to that?
Chef Jim Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 6:37 PM, gatorman said: But he hired an attorney, yes? And he did defend him against being charged. Again, you think this was a truly independent study? You are breathing exhaust fumes maybe? Where have I said anything regarding the independece of this? Where??? My whole conversation has been pointing out how big a fool you were for calling him a defense attorney. And I love the word study you used above. That's is actually an accurate term. That's what the lawyer was hired to do. Study not defend. Defended against being charged.
Doc Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 6:37 PM, gatorman said: But he hired an attorney, yes? And he did defend him against being charged. Again, you think this was a truly independent study? You are breathing exhaust fumes maybe? And you believe that the other studies will be "truly independent"? LOL!
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 6:40 PM, Chef Jim said: Where have I said anything regarding the independece of this? Where??? My whole conversation has been pointing out how big a fool you were for calling him a defense attorney. And I love the word study you used above. That's is actually an accurate term. That's what the lawyer was hired to do. Study not defend. Defended against being charged. You don't understand (not surprisingly). So If its not independent, and its not there to defend the governor, what is it? You want it both ways, and don't think you understand that On 3/31/2014 at 6:49 PM, Doc said: And you believe that the other studies will be "truly independent"? LOL! From the legislature?? A NJ legislature coming up with a independent study? Ha! That's funny. But I suppose Tom, Chef and the rest of the crew think so On 3/31/2014 at 6:40 PM, Chef Jim said: Defended against being charged. Oh, and this is really stupid. Anyone can get attorney, and many times they do, before getting charged.
Chef Jim Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 6:57 PM, gatorman said: Oh, and this is really stupid. Anyone can get attorney, and many times they do, before getting charged. Yup, they hire a defense attorney which Randy Mastro is not.
DC Tom Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 6:37 PM, gatorman said: Why are you trying to change the subject to that? Why are you not livid about the misappropriate of tax dollars by a Republican?
Chef Jim Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 6:57 PM, gatorman said: You don't understand (not surprisingly). So If its not independent, and its not there to defend the governor, what is it? You want it both ways, and don't think you understand that Where did I say it was not independent?? Where?? God you are so bad at this.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 7:19 PM, DC Tom said: Why are you not livid about the misappropriate of tax dollars by a Republican? That crap happens all the time by both sides.
DC Tom Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 7:24 PM, gatorman said: That crap happens all the time by both sides. So you have no problem with a Republican using tax money for personal use, because Democrats do it to? But you have a severe problem with a Republican BENEFITING from such? You're retarded.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 7:19 PM, Chef Jim said: Where did I say it was not independent?? Where?? God you are so bad at this. Ohhhh!! So you are saying you are naive. On 3/31/2014 at 7:27 PM, DC Tom said: So you have no problem with a Republican using tax money for personal use, because Democrats do it to? But you have a severe problem with a Republican BENEFITING from such? You're retarded. I have a problem with people being so stupid (Chef) as to think this was an independent study. Pretty easy to understand
IDBillzFan Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 7:27 PM, DC Tom said: You're retarded. Nice job insulting all the retards.
Chef Jim Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 7:31 PM, gatorman said: I have a problem with people being so stupid (Chef) as to think this was an independent study. Pretty easy to understand Where did I say it was an independent study?? Where??
DC Tom Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 7:31 PM, gatorman said: Ohhhh!! So you are saying you are naive. I have a problem with people being so stupid (Chef) as to think this was an independent study. Pretty easy to understand Nobody said it was, you nit.
OCinBuffalo Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 Christ, another entire page of this? Who cares whether it was independent, who cares if it wasn't? Who cares what a lawyer is called, we all know what has happened here. The only point that matters: it's been 8 days, and the left STILL has no reply to the report. None. You clowns want to quibble, go right ahead. What would PPP be without quibbling? But, don't fool yourselves, the ONLY reply the left has is gatorman's quibbles. How pathetic is that? gatorman: the very best the left can offer!
DC Tom Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 10:20 PM, OCinBuffalo said: Christ, another entire page of this? Who cares whether it was independent, who cares if it wasn't? Who cares what a lawyer is called, we all know what has happened here. The only point that matters: it's been 8 days, and the left STILL has no reply to the report. None. You clowns want to quibble, go right ahead. What would PPP be without quibbling? But, don't fool yourselves, the ONLY reply the left has is gatorman's quibbles. How pathetic is that? gatorman: the very best the left can offer! He's MY cat toy. You've got your own.
OCinBuffalo Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 On 3/31/2014 at 10:22 PM, DC Tom said: He's MY cat toy. You've got your own. While many things can be said about Tom, one that can't is: he's unfair. Thus, fair enough.
Recommended Posts