\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted December 31, 2013 Share Posted December 31, 2013 http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20131227/NEWS/312270334 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corp000085 Posted December 31, 2013 Share Posted December 31, 2013 There's always more to the story. What were the preceding "personnel matters"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 31, 2013 Share Posted December 31, 2013 He had to violate more than just that one rule, and over a significant period of time, to get that level of censure. It is the height of stupidity to punish someone that severely for breaking that one rule after making a good-faith effort to satisfy it and exercising reasonable judgement under the circumstances in breaking it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts