Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Bon Jovi

 

 

 

True, unless they are saving for FAs next year, being under the cap is typical cheapness

Problem with that rationale is it simply isn't true. The Bills could have applied Fitzpatricks dead money this season, instead they are rolling over 8-9 million.

Posted (edited)

Charlie Brown and Homer Simpson..... :o

 

( like Lucy pulls ball away from Charlie , so do the Bills have teased )

Edited by millbank
Posted

I apologize for a post about the Bills, but the most inept person in the organization is Jeff Littman. He's the bean counter telling Ralph what to do, and is the person responsible for all the cash-grabbing and cost-avoidance schemes the Bills do. Why play in Toronto? Get more money. Why be $20 million under this year's salary cap? Save money.

 

This franchise will never succeed as long as Littman is in the picture, and he'll never be out of the picture while Ralph is the owner.

The Bills and the NFL are a business. So, um, money is kind of important.

 

News flash: it will be to the next owner, too.

Posted

The Bills and the NFL are a business. So, um, money is kind of important.

 

News flash: it will be to the next owner, too.

yet, it's possible to consistently field a winner and make money. the threshold for satisfaction with a given profit amount is certainly an important variable. if you mean to imply that the bills can never do both simultaneously, then i'd rather they just fold their tent right now.

×
×
  • Create New...