DC Tom Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 He doesn't deserve any credit for beating Hitler? It doesn't offset his starvation of Ukranians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 First of all, what the !@#$ is "idealistic communism", other than a utopian impossibility. From each according to their musical talents. To each according to their ability to download. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 (edited) From each according to their musical talents. To each according to their ability to download. You have the right to a profit, in the sense that as long as you can make money at a thing in it's natural state, that money is yours. You do not have the right to make a profit, in the sense that if something is unprofitable under natural conditions, the government should intervene and put rules in place that create unnatural scarcity in order to grant you a profit. Your big government bent is showing. Besices, I thought you had agreed to refrain from polluting other threads with your idiocy. Liar. Edited December 6, 2013 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 When it comes to genocides and atrocities I'm always surprised the Brits don't get more love. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 It doesn't offset his starvation of Ukranians. They wouldn't accept the magnificent tractor! But yes, maybe the Tsar, had he survived in power would have industrialized more smoothly You have the right to a profit, in the sense that as long as you can make money at a thing in it's natural state, that money is yours. You do not have the right to make a profit, in the sense that if something is unprofitable under natural conditions, the government should intervene and put rules in place that create unnatural scarcity in order to grant you a profit. Your big government bent is showing. Besices, I thought you had agreed to refrain from polluting other threads with your idiocy. Liar. So tariffs are all evil? And where was your hatred of "unnatural profits" with slavery. That wasn't a free market system at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 They wouldn't accept the magnificent tractor! But yes, maybe the Tsar, had he survived in power would have industrialized more smoothly So tariffs are all evil? And where was your hatred of "unnatural profits" with slavery. That wasn't a free market system at all You're a !@#$ing retard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 You have the right to a profit, in the sense that as long as you can make money at a thing in it's natural state, that money is yours. You do not have the right to make a profit, in the sense that if something is unprofitable under natural conditions, the government should intervene and put rules in place that create unnatural scarcity in order to grant you a profit. Your big government bent is showing. Besices, I thought you had agreed to refrain from polluting other threads with your idiocy. Liar. Thanks for the Econ 102 update. Do you think your prof is so brilliant because he looks like a hippy or because he drinks ultra hip coffee or perhaps because of his British accent? I bet you got a really good grade because you really seem like a sick of pants. Your understanding of reality though is a little off. Can you give an example of something that is profitable in its natural state, excluding real estate, --- ah heck include real estate if you want --- so I can shoot it down? Optional: For bonus points, include an explanation of how the item is profitable. As a tie in to the original topic, explain Mandela's sin against this which would merit us mocking his death and have his body dumped into a hole or stacked in a pile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 They wouldn't accept the magnificent tractor! But yes, maybe the Tsar, had he survived in power would have industrialized more smoothly So tariffs are all evil? And where was your hatred of "unnatural profits" with slavery. That wasn't a free market system at all Every time you say something establishing new bounds of absurdity, I think to myself, "Wow... he topped himself again... That's abso!@#$ingloutely incredible... There's no way anyone could possibly ever say anything dumber than this..." But then you march right out there, and against all odds, continue to stun me with your ability to bring saying ridiculous things to a new level. Thanks for the Econ 102 update. Do you think your prof is so brilliant because he looks like a hippy or because he drinks ultra hip coffee or perhaps because of his British accent? I bet you got a really good grade because you really seem like a sick of pants. Your understanding of reality though is a little off. Can you give an example of something that is profitable in its natural state, excluding real estate, --- ah heck include real estate if you want --- so I can shoot it down? Optional: For bonus points, include an explanation of how the item is profitable. As a tie in to the original topic, explain Mandela's sin against this which would merit us mocking his death and have his body dumped into a hole or stacked in a pile. You can come talk to me about anything related to capitalism when you rub elbows with the folks that I do; making them, and myself fists full of money in the process. Your argument boils down to nothing more than, "Whaaaaaa!!!!" I don't do low rent, I don't do childish impetuousness, and I certainly don't do stupid. You're all three Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 Every time you say something establishing new bounds of absurdity, I think to myself, "Wow... he topped himself again... That's abso!@#$ingloutely incredible... There's no way anyone could possibly ever say anything dumber than this..." But then you march right out there, and against all odds, continue to stun me with your ability to bring saying ridiculous things to a new level. You can come talk to me about anything related to capitalism when you rub elbows with the folks that I do; making them, and myself fists full of money in the process. Your argument boils down to nothing more than, "Whaaaaaa!!!!" I don't do low rent, I don't do childish impetuousness, and I certainly don't do stupid. You're all three You're a sick of pants alright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPS Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 You can come talk to me about anything related to capitalism when you rub elbows with the folks that I do; making them, and myself fists full of money in the process. Your argument boils down to nothing more than, "Whaaaaaa!!!!" I don't do low rent, I don't do childish impetuousness, and I certainly don't do stupid. You're all three it certainly can't be from your economic theories, you'd go broke.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 Coming from the guy defending Stalin, no less. I'm just waiting for you to tell us that Hitler was just misunderstood. He was simply cleaning up the mess left to him from the previous administration. You just didn't understand what he meant when he elaborated on his 'final solution'. He didn't kill those "undesirables", someone else made that happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 (edited) He was simply cleaning up the mess left to him from the previous administration. You just didn't understand what he meant when he elaborated on his 'final solution'. He didn't kill those "undesirables", someone else made that happen. In Hitler's defense, when the German ambassador to Paris was assassinated, he didn't find out until he read about it in Voelkischer Beobachter. Edited December 6, 2013 by DC Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 (edited) it certainly can't be from your economic theories, you'd go broke.. It comes from my understanding of the theories you espouse, which drastically shift the advantage to folks like me. The theories I espouse are not our operating economic system, they are simply what I advocate for, in the wake of the failures of your heroes. Edited December 6, 2013 by TakeYouToTasker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 You're a sick of pants alright. he's making huge deals at the club with orthopods and neurosurgeons who drop an entire days schedule on a moments notice to play golf with him. as to whether he's carrying theirs bags, washing their balls and wiping their putters, we're left to wonder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 In Hitler's defense, when the German ambassador to Paris was assassinated, he didn't find out until he read about it in Voelkischer Beobachter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted December 6, 2013 Share Posted December 6, 2013 he's making huge deals at the club with orthopods and neurosurgeons who drop an entire days schedule on a moments notice to play golf with him. as to whether he's carrying theirs bags, washing their balls and wiping their putters, we're left to wonder. Guys I went to school with, though here in New England we don't golf through the winter months unless we're traveling, which, unfortunately isn't in the cards during the 4th quarter. Too much going on. You, however, should just get back to somthing you're more familiar with, like mistreating your unsuspecting patients, and disparaging charitable giving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayman Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 Perhaps Pontius Pilate killed iidealistic communism? *runs* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
birdog1960 Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 Guys I went to school with, though here in New England we don't golf through the winter months unless we're traveling, which, unfortunately isn't in the cards during the 4th quarter. Too much going on. You, however, should just get back to somthing you're more familiar with, like mistreating your unsuspecting patients, and disparaging charitable giving. many of the really financially successful folks i know would never think of mentioning it and few others are aware it. the others let their wealth speak for itself, either by reputation or conspicuous consumption. the folks that actually vulgarly state their wealth verbally or in writing tend to be all hat and no cattle, as they say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 many of the really financially successful folks i know would never think of mentioning it and few others are aware it. the others let their wealth speak for itself, either by reputation or conspicuous consumption. the folks that actually vulgarly state their wealth verbally or in writing tend to be all hat and no cattle, as they say. Meh. Sounds like a pile of jealousy and self-righteousness to me. I'm proud of what I've built, and I don't mind telling you so. Why not simply get back to destroying the middle class' access to Health care? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
....lybob Posted December 7, 2013 Share Posted December 7, 2013 (edited) You can come talk to me about anything related to capitalism when you rub elbows with the folks that I do; making them, and myself fists full of money in the process. Your argument boils down to nothing more than, "Whaaaaaa!!!!" I don't do low rent, I don't do childish impetuousness, and I certainly don't do stupid. You're all three OK I finally get what going on here, someone is creating characters for sketch comedy or sitcoms , you should of stopped at DCTom and OC this TYTT character just puts it over the top and makes it obvious, I mean how many personality deficient, delusional egomaniacs could really end up in one place - it's like being in a room with Milburn Drysdale , Mr Burns, Newman,Louie De Palma and Dwight Schrute, come man that's overkill - just as a critique I think you are suppose to add a shred of humanity to any reoccurring character something you haven't done yet with your characters. Edited December 7, 2013 by ....lybob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts