Gary M Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 http://l1.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/3BX51HKvmdYorrX851N9Fg--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7Zmk9ZmlsbDtoPTEwMzg7cHlvZmY9MDtxPTc1O3NtPTE7dz05Mjg-/http://l.yimg.com/os/publish-images/omg/2013-11-05/567c0d44-cc57-49a3-a9c8-60a877613092_JaimieAlexander.jpg
boyst Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 (edited) No, you do not. That picture is unpleasant. That women just 100 years ago fought so hard for the right to vote and still fight today for equal pay is appalling. Clearly, this woman would rather be an object to the male audience as a piece of meat rather then display her intellect is amazing. Besides, what is she doing out of the kitchen? And, who got her those shoes? She is a horrible example of feminine power. Edited November 9, 2013 by jboyst62
BringBackFergy Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 No, you do not. That picture is unpleasant. That women just 100 years ago fought so hard for the right to vote and still fight today for equal pay is appalling. Clearly, this woman would rather be an object to the male audience as a piece of meat rather then display her intellect is amazing. Besides, what is she doing out of the kitchen? And, who got her those shoes? She is a horrible example of feminine power. . Yes
ajzepp Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 best....dress...ever who is that exactly? I'd like to partake in a Google rape.
Gugny Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 Yes, I would. But that dress ... And that woman. Are ridiculous. Have some pride.
ExiledInIllinois Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 Are there any videos of her moving in that dress?
KD in CA Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 No, you do not. That picture is unpleasant. That women just 100 years ago fought so hard for the right to vote and still fight today for equal pay is appalling. Clearly, this woman would rather be an object to the male audience as a piece of meat rather then display her intellect is amazing. Besides, what is she doing out of the kitchen? And, who got her those shoes? She is a horrible example of feminine power. A simple 'no' would have been sufficient.
boyst Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 A simple 'no' would have been sufficient. I didn't say no. I said he did not have to ask. I most def would. That dress would not last long.
KD in CA Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 I didn't say no. I said he did not have to ask. I most def would. That dress would not last long. It seemed an odd moment for an all-over-the-lot rant....lol
mead107 Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 Not hot enough.. Check is in the mail...................
BuffaloBill Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 Crickets? Who knew that cricket porn was available on the internet...
Beerball Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 I must ask...why, in the name of all that you hold dear, WHY!?!?!?!?!?!?
ajzepp Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 I must ask...why, in the name of all that you hold dear, WHY!?!?!?!?!?!? :lol: I admired his technique?
ICanSleepWhenI'mDead Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 Are there any videos of her moving in that dress? Her name is Jamie Alexander. See the video clip embedded in this article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2487550/Jaimie-Alexander-attends-Thor-The-Dark-World-premiere-extremely-revealing-dress.html
Jon in Pasadena Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 I must ask...why, in the name of all that you hold dear, WHY!?!?!?!?!?!? Wow... I might have been severely misunderstanding what they meant when people always talked about Pat Kaleta "turtling" ...
Philly McButterpants Posted November 14, 2013 Posted November 14, 2013 Wow... I might have been severely misunderstanding what they meant when people always talked about Pat Kaleta "turtling" ... Wholly unrelated to the topics at hand . . .Nice Avatar. M57. Kewl.
Jon in Pasadena Posted November 15, 2013 Posted November 15, 2013 Wholly unrelated to the topics at hand . . .Nice Avatar. M57. Kewl. Close....but it's actually NGC 7293 They do look pretty similar.
Recommended Posts