Chef Jim Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Shining-light-on-Hillary-Clinton-s-media-blackout-4969322.php
Koko78 Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 (edited) They don't want her being caught saying anything stupid until she's ready to begin her run sometime late next year or early 2015 (when everyone has forgotten about Benghazi and she can run as the "you should have voted for me in 2008 instead of Obama" Democrat candidate). Looks like right now she's doing the minimum she can to keep her head down and still maintain relevance on a national stage while making a buttload of money for these speeches. As for the Whitman comparison, does anyone really believe that the press is going to do anything other than to give Hillary a pass on her "evasiveness"? Edited November 9, 2013 by Koko78
IDBillzFan Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 As for the Whitman comparison, does anyone really believe that the press is going to do anything other than to give Hillary a pass on her "evasiveness"? I was going to write the same thing. While the Whitman strategy was flawed, no one should think for a minute that Hillary will get the same results. The media got their first black president. They now need their first female president.
....lybob Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 I was going to write the same thing. While the Whitman strategy was flawed, no one should think for a minute that Hillary will get the same results. The media got their first black president. They now need their first female president. Which would then set it up for it up for our first black female President " the radio played Michelle by the Beatles and there was a two week clean up needed because of right-wing heads exploding"
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 They don't want her being caught saying anything stupid until she's ready to begin her run sometime late next year or early 2015 (when everyone has forgotten about Benghazi and she can run as the "you should have voted for me in 2008 instead of Obama" Democrat candidate). Looks like right now she's doing the minimum she can to keep her head down and still maintain relevance on a national stage while making a buttload of money for these speeches. As for the Whitman comparison, does anyone really believe that the press is going to do anything other than to give Hillary a pass on her "evasiveness"? Are you suggesting we have a free media that isn't 100% determined to get her elected? Don't you believe in the media conspiracy against Conservatives??
4merper4mer Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 What difference does it make at this point if she opens up her speeches to the press?
IDBillzFan Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 Which would then set it up for it up for our first black female President " the radio played Michelle by the Beatles and there was a two week clean up needed because of right-wing heads exploding" Michelle is going down with her husband...both of their feet tied to the weight that is Obamacare.
Keukasmallies Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 She just might be reviving that scam she pulled in NYS prior to running for the Senate...the "listening tour." Unfortunately for NYS, she listened intently, but actually heard very little (and did even less for NYS).
Koko78 Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 She just might be reviving that scam she pulled in NYS prior to running for the Senate...the "listening tour." Unfortunately for NYS, she listened intently, but actually heard very little (and did even less for NYS). What I found most shocking is that people actually believed she wanted to be a senator for reasons other than setting up a future presidential bid. Though it used to be fun to ask people who claimed she did so much for NY for specifics of what she actually did in the Senate.
Nanker Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 She's afraid that Jimmy Carter's grandson is going to secretly videotape her speeches and leak them to the media who will let the world find out that she wants to enslave white men.
meazza Posted November 10, 2013 Posted November 10, 2013 She's afraid that Jimmy Carter's grandson is going to secretly videotape her speeches and leak them to the media who will let the world find out that she wants to enslave white men.
keepthefaith Posted November 11, 2013 Posted November 11, 2013 She's afraid that Jimmy Carter's grandson is going to secretly videotape her speeches and leak them to the media who will let the world find out that she wants to enslave white men. I can only imagine what she might do with young men interns in the oval office.
Koko78 Posted November 11, 2013 Posted November 11, 2013 I can only imagine what she might do with young men interns in the oval office. Maybe 30 years ago when she wasn't horrible looking... Now it's just cringeworthy.
3rdnlng Posted November 11, 2013 Posted November 11, 2013 I can only imagine what she might do with young men interns in the oval office. You are so far off base on this. The only reason she was pissed way back when was that Monica was cheating on her with Bill or somebody.
B-Man Posted November 11, 2013 Posted November 11, 2013 GAMEPLAN FOR 2016: Hillary Clinton “will use Goldman Sachs money to convince the country that her opponent will hand the government over to Goldman Sachs.” NOPE. NOT AT ALL. NEXT QUESTION? Does Hillary Clinton’s Enthusiasm for Profit Extend Beyond Her Own Earnings? “The news that Hillary Clinton has earned what the Washington Post characterized as ‘close to $500,000′ for two recent speeches to Goldman Sachs is generating a certain amount of excitement.” So if Hillary’s elected, President Goldman Sachs The First will be replaced by President Goldman Sachs The Second. Guess I’ll need to redo this logo a bit if that happens. Meet The New Hillary. Well....that IS Hillary's area of expertise: State Department swept sex scandals under the rug. “Months after whistleblowers accused the State Department of covering up employee sex scandals, most of the cases have been ignored or swept under the rug, critics charge. Records show that staffers were given cushy jobs or allowed to retire, and watchdogs say the feds have hardly bothered to investigate since the shenanigans came to light this past summer.” Rules are for the little people. .
Recommended Posts