Leelee Phoenix Posted November 8, 2013 Posted November 8, 2013 inb4 he's better then TJ Graham And Jeff Tuel I agree that Brad got a raw deal by fans here, becoming the scapegoat after Kelsay (who deserved it). Smith was overpaid for what he did, but there was never a commitment to using him. Like Chan Gailey was ever going to be innovative or gutsy in any way. He was a very good weapon in short yardage situations
boyst Posted November 8, 2013 Posted November 8, 2013 And Jeff Tuel I agree that Brad got a raw deal by fans here, becoming the scapegoat after Kelsay (who deserved it). Smith was overpaid for what he did, but there was never a commitment to using him. Like Chan Gailey was ever going to be innovative or gutsy in any way. He was a very good weapon in short yardage situations how is that different then Graham? Or Tuel? Tuel is an UDFA in his first year in the leauge. Who in the world would expect anything from him, let alone think he could perform to the level that he has thus far? Graham holds resentment because he was drafted too early for many to find comfort and has not been as well as another WR taken later...TY Hilton. Travis Benjamin 22 games, 23/403/2 Chris Givens 24 games, 68/1107/3 TY Hilton 23 games, 84/1394/12 Mohamed Sanu 18 games, 47/470/4 TJ Graham 24 games, 46/515/1 DeVier Posey - Houston 19 games, 15/189/0 Rueben Randle - NYG 24 games, 79/671/7 Ryan Broyles - Detroit 16 games, 30/395/2 Alshon Jeffrey - Chicago 18 games, 62/988/6 Stephen Hill - NYJ 20 games, 44/592/4 Brian Quick - STL 24 games, 22/382/3 AJ Jenkins - SF 12 games, 1/6/0 Kendall Wright - Ten 23 games, 107/1128/5 Michael Floyd - Ari 24 games, 79/995/4 Justin Blackmon - Jac 20 games, 93/1280/6 How many other WR taken before or after TJ are better? I'd rather have TJ then Blackmon, Jenkins, Quick, Broyles, Posey, or Benjamin. Sanu is right there with him. Givens and Hilton were much better values then Wright, Blackmon, Hill, Jeffrey, and Randle... but hey, TJ sucks.
T master Posted November 8, 2013 Posted November 8, 2013 I wonder how much money that will save us on the cap for next year & on his over all contract ? Sexy Rexy will probably pick him up & put him back to work, never did really ilke the hire didn't ever see what Chan saw in his ability as a QB !!
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 So long, farewell good sir. I can't bring myself to hate the man. He played hard when he was here, even in a system that was ultimately doomed to failure. But in the end, would I give him a roster spot over Woods? Hell no. Goodwin. Hell f ing no. Hogan? No. Easley...no. To be blunt, we've picked up new talent. Everything we might have used him for, we have someone better, and the things he's better at we no longer use. It's an issue of fit and I don't see paying all that much for someone who is realistically 4th WR on the depth chart (after Stevie, Woods, and Goodwin) and 4th on the QB chart (EJ, Lewis, Tuel)
vincec Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 It is not a bad decision at all. With that being said I think that he could have helped this team tremendously in short yardage. They really stink in short yardage and he was great at moving the chains. The Bills have fixed their short yardage game under Marrone. They are now 8th in the NFL in 3rd and short. They stunk under Gailey, when Brad Smith was playing for them. http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/bills-nfl/bills-notebook-team-shines-on-third-and-short-20131106
Kirby Jackson Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 The Bills have fixed their short yardage game under Marrone. They are now 8th in the NFL in 3rd and short. They stunk under Gailey, when Brad Smith was playing for them. http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/bills-nfl/bills-notebook-team-shines-on-third-and-short-20131106 I guess that I can't argue with numbers. There have been multiple times that I remember in short yardage (in big situations) where they haven't converted. The 1st year that BS was on the roster they converted with ease. For some reason they stopped using it late in that first year and at all in the 2nd year. He was a big guy that was hard to stop when he had momentum. He was not a big play guy and not worth the contract but did serve a role IMO.
Orton's Arm Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 (edited) I wonder how much money that will save us on the cap for next year & on his over all contract ? Sexy Rexy will probably pick him up & put him back to work, never did really ilke the hire didn't ever see what Chan saw in his ability as a QB !! I was never a proponent of the hire either. Brad Smith was a jack of all trades, master of none. Let's say you line a guy like that up at WR. The problem there is that he's taking the place of another, more capable WR. Same if you use him as a return man. The one position where his versatility is actually meaningful is at quarterback; because he's a threat to run or pass. But there are other players on the roster whose overall combination of running + passing ability makes them much more threatening at QB than Brad Smith. That said, it's not Brad Smith's personal fault that his salary was several times higher than his worth as a player. If a given job normally paid $50,000 a year, and someone offered you $200,000 annually for that job, who here would demand to receive no more than the $50,000? Edited November 9, 2013 by Edwards' Arm
San Jose Bills Fan Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 im still disappointed they spent SO much time with him in the QB room. it just wasnt needed if only a handful of passes were going to be expected. somewhere the plan didnt meet execution and value/production ended up being the victim. i dont think hes a guy lacking talent as much as a player that was let down by his leadership and the situation Agreed. Smith was either not who they thought he was or they just couldn't figure out a way to production out of him. Either way the fault is not with the player. He threw a couple of passes with both being intercepted. Which is ironic because he holds several passing records at Missouri.
Gugny Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 I've been a Brad Smith fan since the day the Bills signed him. We needed a wildcat option, he was prepared. We needed a backup WR (badly), he was prepared. We needed an emergency QB, he was prepared. He was durable, ready, willing, selfless and professional. In my opinion, that made him worth every dime and I still consider it a good signing. I hope he squeaks out a few more years and does well.
Marv's Neighbor Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 We're doomed! Who's going to run Chan's Wildcat???
The Senator Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 Sorry to see him go, but there was just no spot on the roster for the guy.
NoSaint Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 (edited) I'm sure some would relate to wanting to pursue and being hired for a job though a different one at the company might better fit your skills so your known to pitch in there when needed... And then because your a team player when a guy in another department leaves you are willing to carry some of the weight.... Then suddenly you are the worst case scenario guy instead of the high potential at a specialized task guy.... That's brad smith with the bills. He wanted to be a qb, was best suited for a handful of gadget running or screen plays and was a capable fill in at WR....but never got to excel at any of them despite having talent. He became known as the best option when all the options were bad instead of getting to find where his own ceiling was given a realistic assessment of his skills and an attempt to maximize those. Edited November 9, 2013 by NoSaint
reddogblitz Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 (edited) I'm thinking we should have kept him around and let him play some WR. He's better than TJ, Hulk Hogan, and Easley. He's also good at taking the direct snap and taking it into the EZ on short and goal to go. We could certainly use that with our difficulty getting in. Plus he's good at returning KOs for about half the games that Goodwin is out due to injury. Oh well ... Edited November 9, 2013 by reddogblitz
KD in CA Posted November 9, 2013 Posted November 9, 2013 Perhaps the worst FA signing in the past five years. I understood fans being fooled because Smith had a few big moments against Buffalo, but how the FO could give a gadget player/kick returner 4/$16M is still baffling.
l< j Posted November 12, 2013 Posted November 12, 2013 To sign with Philly: http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/writer/jason-la-canfora/24223025/eagles-to-sign-multidimensional-receiver-brad-smith-pending-physiical
26CornerBlitz Posted November 12, 2013 Author Posted November 12, 2013 To sign with Philly: http://www.cbssports...nding-physiical Thanks for the update.
26CornerBlitz Posted November 14, 2013 Author Posted November 14, 2013 @JasonLaCanfora Brad Smith's 2yr deal with PHI worth a prorated $1.2M this season ($494K) and $75K in incentives. Has base of $1.3M in '14, $200K in bonuses
NoSaint Posted November 14, 2013 Posted November 14, 2013 potentially a good spot for him, assuming kelly is willing to use him in the right role.
Utah John Posted November 14, 2013 Posted November 14, 2013 Good guy, good player, bad fit, good luck down the road.
Recommended Posts