Alaska Darin Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/11/01/only-6-enrolled-in-obamacare-on-first-day-internal-notes-show/?hpt=hp_t1 Don't worry, they'll fix it. It'll cost hundreds of millions of dollars more for JUST A WEBSITE, but they'll fix it. Watch out what you ask for. You just might get it.
Nanker Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 Sure, you laugh now. But pretty soon those ranks will swell to a dozen or more. Then B.O. can really crow about the massive success his abortion is.
Taro T Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 On 11/1/2013 at 8:39 AM, Alaska Darin said: http://politicaltick...show/?hpt=hp_t1 Don't worry, they'll fix it. It'll cost hundreds of millions of dollars more for JUST A WEBSITE, but they'll fix it. Watch out what you ask for. You just might get it. But it's not fair to only consider the people that signed up via the website. They must have had at LEAST 2 additional people sign up via phone.
Just Jack Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 On 11/1/2013 at 11:39 AM, Nanker said: Sure, you laugh now. But pretty soon those ranks will swell to a dozen or more. Then B.O. can really crow about the massive success his abortion is. But if they get a dozen more signed up, that's a 200% increase for the number of insured Americans under Obamacare.
Alaska Darin Posted November 1, 2013 Author Posted November 1, 2013 On 11/1/2013 at 12:57 PM, Just Jack said: But if they get a dozen more signed up, that's a 200% increase for the number of insured Americans under Obamacare. The DNC just called. There's a job for you if you want it.
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 (edited) Incase it somehow snuck past anyone, that's 19.6 million per. person. Savings indeed. Edited November 1, 2013 by TakeYouToTasker
IDBillzFan Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 On 11/1/2013 at 1:48 PM, TakeYouToTasker said: Incase it somehow snuck past anyone, that's 19.6 million per. person. Savings indeed. That makes Solyndra and Cash for Clunkers seem like absolute bargains.
Nanker Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 Jay Carney speaks: http://youtu.be/duvq2pYID9M
B-Man Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 On 11/1/2013 at 2:34 PM, LABillzFan said: That makes Solyndra and Cash for Clunkers seem like absolute bargains. Funny you should say.......................... Speaking of Failed Big-Government Programs…: The ongoing debacle that is the administration’s rollout of ObamaCare has reignited debate about technocracy and big-government liberalism. But Democrats who worry that their mode of coercive politics will be discredited by ObamaCare should be thankful it took this long. A very well-timed reminder of this arrived yesterday from the Brookings Institution. Scholars at the left-leaning think tank analyzed the so-called “Cash for Clunkers” program, the 2009 “stimulus” program intended to get cleaner cars on the road by providing cash vouchers for those who trade in older gas guzzlers and buy newer, more efficient cars. The administration patted itself on the back when the program ran out of money, apparently pleasantly surprised that people took free money during an economic downturn. But Brookings confirms that this was, of course, a terrible program. Here are their major findings: Yay for big government..........
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 Let's just all hope that times heals everything! I just wonder what Plan B will be if we enter the health care death spiral with super rising costs? Someone will have to do something... On 11/1/2013 at 3:09 PM, B-Man said: Funny you should say.......................... Speaking of Failed Big-Government Programs…: The ongoing debacle that is the administration’s rollout of ObamaCare has reignited debate about technocracy and big-government liberalism. But Democrats who worry that their mode of coercive politics will be discredited by ObamaCare should be thankful it took this long. A very well-timed reminder of this arrived yesterday from the Brookings Institution. Scholars at the left-leaning think tank analyzed the so-called “Cash for Clunkers” program, the 2009 “stimulus” program intended to get cleaner cars on the road by providing cash vouchers for those who trade in older gas guzzlers and buy newer, more efficient cars. The administration patted itself on the back when the program ran out of money, apparently pleasantly surprised that people took free money during an economic downturn. But Brookings confirms that this was, of course, a terrible program. Here are their major findings: Yay for big government.......... It just says that the regular stimulous program worked better created. Ummmm....ok
Jauronimo Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 (edited) Even if just one person is helped by this legislation, then hasn't it been a success? Edited November 1, 2013 by Jauronimo
Alaska Darin Posted November 1, 2013 Author Posted November 1, 2013 On 11/1/2013 at 3:47 PM, gatorman said: Let's just all hope that times heals everything! This is an example of a "high information" voter, right Birdman? Birdman? You still around? Where are you, Birdman? On 11/1/2013 at 3:47 PM, gatorman said: I just wonder what Plan B will be if we enter the health care death spiral with super rising costs? Someone will have to do something... Again, the ACA does NOTHING to address health care costs. Let me repeat that for you, since you're blindingly stupid: THE ACA DOES NOTHING TO ADDRESS HEALTH CARE COSTS. NOTHING.
Rob's House Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 On 11/1/2013 at 3:51 PM, Jauronimo said: Even if just one person is helped by this legislation, then hasn't it been a success? I'm still trying to figure out how these exchanges add value for anyone. So far I've got nothing.
Trump_is_Mentally_fit Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 On 11/1/2013 at 3:51 PM, Alaska Darin said: This is an example of a "high information" voter, right Birdman? Birdman? You still around? Where are you, Birdman? Again, the ACA does NOTHING to address health care costs. Let me repeat that for you, since you're blindingly stupid: THE ACA DOES NOTHING TO ADDRESS HEALTH CARE COSTS. NOTHING. Not what I was talking about dude. Settle down, you should be happy, the health care reform looks to be failing, fail is good for you, people don't get health care, smile man. There will be a Plan B at some point though
....lybob Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 ACA is just the scenic route to single payer it's too bad we couldn't get there directly and instead had to use some Heritage foundation right-wing crap plan to get the ball rolling but we will get there.
Rob's House Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 On 11/1/2013 at 4:09 PM, gatorman said: Not what I was talking about dude. Settle down, you should be happy, the health care reform looks to be failing, fail is good for you, people don't get health care, smile man. There will be a Plan B at some point though "Plan B" is Hillarycare, but really that was the plan all along.
TakeYouToTasker Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 (edited) On 11/1/2013 at 4:15 PM, ....lybob said: ACA is just the scenic route to single payer it's too bad we couldn't get there directly and instead had to use some Heritage foundation right-wing crap plan to get the ball rolling but we will get there. The ACA was a "right-wing crap plan"? OK, Captain Revisionist Outright Liar. Please demonstrate any legislative support from anyone on the right for this law, which was enacted while Democrats held both houses of Congress and the Oval Office. Edited November 1, 2013 by TakeYouToTasker
ExiledInIllinois Posted November 1, 2013 Posted November 1, 2013 On 11/1/2013 at 4:15 PM, ....lybob said: ACA is just the scenic route to single payer it's too bad we couldn't get there directly and instead had to use some Heritage foundation right-wing crap plan to get the ball rolling but we will get there. Yep. Why wasn't there a public option added?
Recommended Posts