Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Sure, you laugh now. But pretty soon those ranks will swell to a dozen or more. Then B.O. can really crow about the massive success his abortion is.

Posted

http://politicaltick...show/?hpt=hp_t1

 

:lol:

 

Don't worry, they'll fix it. It'll cost hundreds of millions of dollars more for JUST A WEBSITE, but they'll fix it.

 

Watch out what you ask for. You just might get it.

But it's not fair to only consider the people that signed up via the website. They must have had at LEAST 2 additional people sign up via phone. :lol:

Posted

Sure, you laugh now. But pretty soon those ranks will swell to a dozen or more. Then B.O. can really crow about the massive success his abortion is.

 

But if they get a dozen more signed up, that's a 200% increase for the number of insured Americans under Obamacare.

Posted

But if they get a dozen more signed up, that's a 200% increase for the number of insured Americans under Obamacare.

The DNC just called. There's a job for you if you want it.

Posted

That makes Solyndra and Cash for Clunkers seem like absolute bargains.

 

Funny you should say..........................

 

Speaking of Failed Big-Government Programs…:

 

The ongoing debacle that is the administration’s rollout of ObamaCare has reignited debate about technocracy and big-government liberalism. But Democrats who worry that their mode of coercive politics will be discredited by ObamaCare should be thankful it took this long.

 

A very
well-timed reminder of this arrived yesterday
from the Brookings Institution.
Scholars at the left-leaning think tank
analyzed the so-called “Cash for Clunkers” program, the 2009 “stimulus” program intended to get cleaner cars on the road by providing cash vouchers for those who trade in older gas guzzlers and buy newer, more efficient cars. The administration patted itself on the back when the program ran out of money, apparently pleasantly surprised that people took free money during an economic downturn.

 

But Brookings confirms that this was, of course, a terrible program. Here are their
:

 

 

 

 

Yay for big government..........
Posted

Let's just all hope that times heals everything! :thumbsup:

 

I just wonder what Plan B will be if we enter the health care death spiral with super rising costs? Someone will have to do something...

 

Funny you should say..........................

 

Speaking of Failed Big-Government Programs…:

 

The ongoing debacle that is the administration’s rollout of ObamaCare has reignited debate about technocracy and big-government liberalism. But Democrats who worry that their mode of coercive politics will be discredited by ObamaCare should be thankful it took this long.

 

A very
well-timed reminder of this arrived yesterday
from the Brookings Institution.
Scholars at the left-leaning think tank
analyzed the so-called “Cash for Clunkers” program, the 2009 “stimulus” program intended to get cleaner cars on the road by providing cash vouchers for those who trade in older gas guzzlers and buy newer, more efficient cars. The administration patted itself on the back when the program ran out of money, apparently pleasantly surprised that people took free money during an economic downturn.

 

But Brookings confirms that this was, of course, a terrible program. Here are their
:

 

 

 

 

Yay for big government..........

 

It just says that the regular stimulous program worked better created. Ummmm....ok

Posted

Let's just all hope that times heals everything!

This is an example of a "high information" voter, right Birdman? Birdman? You still around? Where are you, Birdman?

I just wonder what Plan B will be if we enter the health care death spiral with super rising costs? Someone will have to do something...

Again, the ACA does NOTHING to address health care costs. Let me repeat that for you, since you're blindingly stupid:

 

THE ACA DOES NOTHING TO ADDRESS HEALTH CARE COSTS.

 

NOTHING.

Posted

Even if just one person is helped by this legislation, then hasn't it been a success?

 

I'm still trying to figure out how these exchanges add value for anyone. So far I've got nothing.

Posted

This is an example of a "high information" voter, right Birdman? Birdman? You still around? Where are you, Birdman?

 

Again, the ACA does NOTHING to address health care costs. Let me repeat that for you, since you're blindingly stupid:

 

THE ACA DOES NOTHING TO ADDRESS HEALTH CARE COSTS.

 

NOTHING.

 

Not what I was talking about dude. Settle down, you should be happy, the health care reform looks to be failing, fail is good for you, people don't get health care, smile man. There will be a Plan B at some point though

Posted

ACA is just the scenic route to single payer it's too bad we couldn't get there directly and instead had to use some Heritage foundation right-wing crap plan to get the ball rolling but we will get there.

Posted

 

 

Not what I was talking about dude. Settle down, you should be happy, the health care reform looks to be failing, fail is good for you, people don't get health care, smile man. There will be a Plan B at some point though

 

"Plan B" is Hillarycare, but really that was the plan all along.

Posted (edited)

ACA is just the scenic route to single payer it's too bad we couldn't get there directly and instead had to use some Heritage foundation right-wing crap plan to get the ball rolling but we will get there.

The ACA was a "right-wing crap plan"? OK, Captain Revisionist Outright Liar. Please demonstrate any legislative support from anyone on the right for this law, which was enacted while Democrats held both houses of Congress and the Oval Office.

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
Posted

ACA is just the scenic route to single payer it's too bad we couldn't get there directly and instead had to use some Heritage foundation right-wing crap plan to get the ball rolling but we will get there.

 

Yep. Why wasn't there a public option added?

×
×
  • Create New...