DC Greg Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 All I can say is that it was a tough loss today, we definitely got beat, but the team fought really, really hard. The effort's there, good game plan, just need a little better execution in some phases and a few more players. If these guys keep buying in and sticking with each other, and if EJ works out, we are going to have a pretty damn good football team. Go Bills.
bills44 Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 Robert Woods- I think he's going to be a good one, but he's been MIA of late. We need more out of him now. Â Goodwin- a couple of really nice grabs. Wasn't sure what to expect from him, but I've been pleasantly surprised by him so far. Â Lewis- the kid is tough, but he really needs to take care of the ball better. I think he's put the ball on the carpet 5x over the last 3 weeks. His pocket awareness isn't particularly good, IMO, which contributes to some of the shots he takes. Â FJ - great 1Q, but ineffective thereafter. By all accounts, he's a good guy and teammate, but, IMO, he's best used as a situational, change-of-pace back. Â Alonso - better than he was against CIN and MIA, but he still wasn't great today, especially relative to the way he played to start the season. Â Robey - I think he'll be a solid 3/4 CB in the NFL, but he had a rough one today. The Stills TD and the pass that went right through his hands were huge plays that majorly impacted the outcome. Â Why does it seem like opposing TEs either plow over or drag forward our Safeties, but Chandler gets tossed around by opposing safeties? Â Lawson's absence was huge. I hope to see Hughes drop back in coverage as infrequently as possible for the rest of the year. Â NE/MIA was like a TOR/BOS hockey game - I was desperately hoping for both teams to lose. Â I love this team's fight and toughness - I haven't seen those traits out of a Bills team in years. We're getting there...
Beebes Bubble Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 Â 2) Thad Lewis was exposed today. Â How exactly does a #4 QB get exposed? If anything, it's amazing that the Bills are getting the quality of play from him that they are. Here is a guy that 32 teams didn't even deem worthy to be a #2 QB in the league, which made him at the very most tied for being the 65th best NFL QB prospect (it's actually even lower, considering some teams had 3 QBs on their opening day roster). Â Thad was the fourth sting QB and considering that he is playing amazing. He has definitely showed enough to be a #2 somewhere after EJ comes back.
Simon Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 He has definitely showed enough to be a #2 somewhere after EJ comes back. I don't know, man. He's got significant accuracy issues and doesn't have a great feel for what's going on immediately around him. I agree that he's played beyond expectations but I have my doubts about him being a primary backup in this league.
Big C Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 Â Thad was the fourth sting QB and considering that he is playing amazing. He has definitely showed enough to be a #2 somewhere after EJ comes back. Â Yeah, here.
ganesh Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 my one overall comment on the game...based on the rules in place....is there a team that tries to hit high more often than the saints? based on the rules in place, they are on the verge of dirty... Â It is after all the Rob Ryan's defense. IT has always been known for dirty play.
ganesh Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 Robert Woods- I think he's going to be a good one, but he's been MIA of late. We need more out of him now. I don't know what happened here. May be Chandler is getting more looks than Woods. Â Goodwin- a couple of really nice grabs. Wasn't sure what to expect from him, but I've been pleasantly surprised by him so far. It is amazing how much he is open. With an accurate QB like Brees, Goodwin could have had the same game as Stills had for the Saints. Â Lewis- the kid is tough, but he really needs to take care of the ball better. I think he's put the ball on the carpet 5x over the last 3 weeks. His pocket awareness isn't particularly good, IMO, which contributes to some of the shots he takes. Â Agreed. He cost us too many points. When you give such field position to Brees in his own backyard, he will kill you. Â Â FJ - great 1Q, but ineffective thereafter. By all accounts, he's a good guy and teammate, but, IMO, he's best used as a situational, change-of-pace back. Â Â Â > Lawson's absence was huge. I hope to see Hughes drop back in coverage as infrequently as possible for the rest of the year. Â This!
Steve O Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 I wasn't upset at the second challenge. It would have forced a 4th down and from where I was sitting, it looked like we stopped them short of the 1st down marker. I actually wasn't upset at the first challenge. I don't get upset at using a timeout on offense if the ensuing play is successful. We had third and goal coming up, the challenge quieted the crowd at least for a little while to collect thoughts, and the next play was a touchdown. We basically used a timeout and called a play that worked. Had the challenge worked the timeout would have been saved so why not try it instead of just calling the timeout.
ganesh Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 I actually wasn't upset at the first challenge. I don't get upset at using a timeout on offense if the ensuing play is successful. We had third and goal coming up, the challenge quieted the crowd at least for a little while to collect thoughts, and the next play was a touchdown. We basically used a timeout and called a play that worked. Had the challenge worked the timeout would have been saved so why not try it instead of just calling the timeout. And the call was bad. The top angle camera clearly showed the ball crossing the goal line. Things just did not go our way.
DanInUticaTampa Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 Our QBs are getting hit way too much. This needs to be addressed. OL scrappy? I don't know about that. Â Thad holding onto the ball too long causes a lot of this. Oline is average at worst.
DefenseWinzChampionshipz Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 I actually wasn't upset at the first challenge. I don't get upset at using a timeout on offense if the ensuing play is successful. We had third and goal coming up, the challenge quieted the crowd at least for a little while to collect thoughts, and the next play was a touchdown. We basically used a timeout and called a play that worked. Had the challenge worked the timeout would have been saved so why not try it instead of just calling the timeout. Â You're absolutely right. I wasn't mad at either challenge and not because I'm a Bills fan, but I truly believe Fred had crossed the goal line on the 1st challenge and I believe we stopped them short on the 2nd challenge. What I love even more is how upset Marrone was at himself for being 0-4 in challenges this year. Shows how much he wants to be correct. I hope it doesn't stop him from challenging and becoming a Gailey...
Wayne Cubed Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 (edited) Robert Woods- I think he's going to be a good one, but he's been MIA of late. We need more out of him now. Â With regards to this I think, and I don't have proof really, that Lewis isn't going through his progressions very fast. I can only assume Woods is #2 maybe #3 option on most pass plays. I think Lewis isn't getting to that read and waits too long for his #1 option to get open. Hence him holding onto the ball too long and taking lots of sacks. Â Whereas in contrast EJ goes through his progressions, maybe too fast sometimes not letting his #1 option get open, and finds Woods. Edited October 28, 2013 by Wayne Cubed
DanInUticaTampa Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 Â Â With regards to this I think, and I don't have proof really, that Lewis isn't going through his progressions very must. I can only assume Woods is #2 maybe #3 option on most pass plays. I think Lewis isn't getting to that read and waits too long for his #1 option to get open. Hence him holding onto the ball too long and taking lots of sacks. Â Whereas in contrast EJ goes through his progressions, maybe too fast sometimes not letting his #1 option get open, and finds Woods. Â I think this is a fair observation.
xsoldier54 Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 Frustrating loss. Unfortunately the Bills just made too many mistakes against a good team playing at home. Can't do that in the NFL. You will lose every time. The good news is that I do see improvement in this team and they seem to compete every single week. I'm thinking an upset of KC may be in order at home next week. They will have to eliminate the miscues though. They are good enough to beat KC, but will have to be on top of their game.
eball Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 As is often the case, that game turned on a handful of plays, but by no means were the Bills outclassed or outmanned. They hung in there, in a hostile environment, with a 3rd string QB. Â The plays I'd like back: Â -- Stills left uncovered after Bills took 10-7 lead (just an excellent scheme to confuse the D) -- Facemask penalty that nullified a red zone INT (halftime score would have been 14-10 instead of 21-10) -- Needless hold by Chandler to nullify long TD to Graham (still scored on the drive, but lost valuable minutes off the clock) -- 3rd and 20 pass to Stills (D did everything right; that was just Brees at his best) Â These Bills are fun to watch and root for, and there is absolutely no quit in them. Can't wait for a healthy EJ and CJ to get back in there. A 9-7 record at the end of all of this would not surprise me at all. The arrow is pointing up.
thewildrabbit Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 (edited) My thoughts about this game, and team. Â This years 5-1 New Orleans Saints had the #5 offense in points scored, the #6 offense in yards. The #1 TE in yards in the NFL. A top 5 QB in Drew Brees. Plus, the Saints have the #4 defense in points allowed, #12 in yards allowed. A definite playoff team, and perhaps even the NFC SB participant. Â According to the late, great 49er HC, Bill Walsh. If it generally takes 3-4 years for any QB to fully develop, so that he fully understands what he is looking at when he looks over the opposing defense. Understands and learns how to set O line protections. Learns how to set his receivers for the hot reads. Learns how to go thru his progressions as the play develops. Then when you watch QB's like Peyton Manning - Drew Brees you expect your QB to perform as well. When he doesn't during the game you come to the realization it ain't gonna happen any time soon, not with a rookie or guy just off the PS. Â Â I look back at the 2012 season with very experienced Bills coaches / journeyman QB, and then recall what that years team played like against a top defense, and better then average offense in the 2012 SF 49ers. After that week 5, 45-3 blowout I can only remember how embarrassing it was to be a Bills fan with Chan Gailey as HC, Dave Wannstedt as DC, Ryan Fitzpatrick at QB. Â This new Buffalo Bills coaching staff has a rookie at OC, a rookie at HC and a QB just off the PS. I can only think I couldn't be prouder of the combined effort of the entire team. Nobody gave up, and conceded defeat. Many played injured and played their proverbial hearts out for HC Doug Marrone. Were there nothing but perfect calls, perfect game management, perfect player performance, heck no! But this years players believe they can win, that they can make plays. I can only think that this entire team will learn and grow as they go. Â Â For the first time in years I feel like this franchise might be only a few players from being a playoff team. Unfortunately QB might still be one of those players! But it really is to early to see If Lewis or EJ will or will not develop into a decent QB. The O line is exactly what I've been thinking it is, and in need of some serious upgrades at several positions to help protect those young QB's. Same with the defense in only lacking a few players. Â However, unlike in the past. I now have faith that Doug Whaley can find those upgrades. Watching this team play its heart out made me proud to be a Bills fan again. Edited October 28, 2013 by FeartheLosing
Solomon Grundy Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 The problem with Woods is the QB! Lewis has missed him on multiple occasions due to his accuracy. In yesterday's game, in the first half, Woods came free across the field, had Lewis been able to connect with him the Bills would have had a TD instead of a FG. Â Here are some thoughts I've been pondering. If Teddy Bridgewater is sitting there when it's the Bills time to pick in next years draft, do they take him? Will the Bills trade Jairus Byrd or do they see that he is a compliment on this defense? Do the Bills sit Spiller out another game to rest his ankle? Why didn't the Bills move the pocket for Lewis when they saw the pressure he was getting up the middle? Why don't other QBs take a page from the Brees/Rodgers play book and move around in the pocket or roll out to extend the time to make downfield passes. That TD to Stills was due to Brees rolling away from the pressure and finding Stills 1 on 1 with a DB and gave him an opportunity to make a play.
tennesseeboy Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 All in all, saints are a much more talented and experienced team, but we are a much better team than last year, even given the injuries. The team is gutsy and will take its lumps this year especially from teams like the saints. That being said I'm still going to pull for six to eight wins. The playoffs will be ours next year.
Beerball Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 FJ - great 1Q, but ineffective thereafter. By all accounts, he's a good guy and teammate, but, IMO, he's best used as a situational, change-of-pace back. so, you think we have 2 of those?
TPS Posted October 28, 2013 Posted October 28, 2013 Kyle Williams played like a Pro Bowler yesterday. I think it came down to 2 plays: obviously the INT at the end of the half, which wipes 7 off the board; and the D-holding call on a 3rd down that would've forced a punt, and the Saints go on to score again. Take those 14 points away, and the game is a coin toss, though the Saints still probably win. Point is, they were didn't look that over-matched even with Thad at the wheel (there's another 14 points related to his TOs).
Recommended Posts